FlawlessThaw
most 'know it all' poster
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 29,601
One thing is for certain with this bloke running the country, no wonder we have the second most deaths from Covid in the world.
I think the pool of people you’d want to hand your kid over to is probably pretty limited and if his young niece could look after the kid it does seem like an ideal situation all things considered. I would have probably done the same thing if what he says about it all is true. I think this is why the left wing press are going after the eye sight story because that part seems implausible.Rubbish questions. Does he not have any extended family to provide care in London? If it was about security why is he driving to test his eyesight with his child in the vehicle? Why did he feel the need to drive all the way back to London when he can easily work remotely until guidelines were relaxed?
The only way Cummings will be toast is if it transpires that he did in fact use the services on his drive up to Durham.
I felt "extreme sympathy" though?Would have been much easier if he just apologized...
Do we really believe there is no one within 260 miles that he can trust with childcare?I think the pool of people you’d want to hand your kid over to is probably pretty limited and if his young niece could look after the kid it does seem like an ideal situation all things considered. I would have probably done the same thing if what he says about it all is true. I think this is why the left wing press are going after the eye sight story because that part seems implausible.
Im surprised the Government hadnt appointed a nanny or something for him anyway. But yeah surely there was someone between Point A & B that could have been used.Do we really believe there is no one within 260 miles that he can trust with childcare?
Or just say we are all cnuts.Would have been much easier if he just apologized...
He could not drive 45 minutes on the way back to test his eyesight after recovering without his son needing a comfort break but on the way up it was not a problem.There's no way he drove all the way to Durham with a 4 year-old and a sick wife and didn't stop. That just isn't possible.
Although maybe he couldn't hear their muffled cries from the boot.
What’s worse is that they were sticking the knife in before hand - the change in their opinions and the positive tweets shown from other mp’s immediately after the conference seemed to be by design to me.Alex Deane former advisor to David Cameron and Joey Jones former advisor to Theresa May thanks for your opinions.
Never change, BBC.
Its possible yes, certainly that are at an ideal age to look after the kid in the midst of a pandemic. I don’t have kids of my own but I don’t think my brothers would leave their kids with anyone except for immediate family. It’s a pretty big thing to ask of people too.Do we really believe there is no one within 260 miles that he can trust with childcare?
Would you have done it if you held the role he does?I think the pool of people you’d want to hand your kid over to is probably pretty limited and if his young niece could look after the kid it does seem like an ideal situation all things considered. I would have probably done the same thing if what he says about it all is true. I think this is why the left wing press are going after the eye sight story because that part seems implausible.
Of course not. He went up there to have a quiet country getaway with his wife and kid and it coincided with a trip to a castle of his missus' birthday. If they could have snuck into a restaurant they would have so they took the best option available. Now he's been caught out and he's giving us his "dick accidentally fell into a horse" excuse.Do we really believe there is no one within 260 miles that he can trust with childcare?
Probably yes but then I’ve never been in such a role.Would you have done it if you held the role he does?
He made a point of saying there were three exceptional circumstances: 2 parents potentially being unable to take care of a 4 year old, the fact he works at #10, and the fact his house was a target of some kind. He let slip after about the 7th time of asking that some people might think "it's your own fault people were making threats at your house, that's not a good reason to leave" at this point in the press conference. I'm surprised no-one challenged him on that point he kept leaning on. He clearly chose to get out of London because it was his preference, not because it was the only choice he could make. He seemed genuinely oblivious to the fact that other parents have had to deal with worse situations.Do we really believe there is no one within 260 miles that he can trust with childcare?
so it would be ok for him to travel to the Midlands or Leeds for example? If 260 miles is not acceptable, would 30, 60, 90,150 miles.Im surprised the Government hadnt appointed a nanny or something for him anyway. But yeah surely there was someone between Point A & B that could have been used.
And yet he clearly stated that he was going back to London to arrange child care.Do we really believe there is no one within 260 miles that he can trust with childcare?
Well, is there any immediate family in London for Cummings? He seems to be suggesting in his judgement he felt that he could drive for 5 hours without having to stop for fuel or to take his son to the toilet, potentially exposing other people to the virus, was a more reasonable decision than finding someone locally to care for his son and potentially exposing them to the virus.Its possible yes, certainly that are at an ideal age to look after the kid in the midst of a pandemic. I don’t have kids of my own but I don’t think my brothers would leave their kids with anyone except for immediate family. It’s a pretty big thing to ask of people too.
I think what he did wasn’t in the spirit of the rules but the fact is that he’s from a wealthy family and they had a pretty ideal situation at his parent property as he describes it. If I were him then I likely would have done the same if the other people living at the properties were happy about it.
I find that surprising, I definitely wouldn’t. Regardless of where I stand on it as a moral act , I could have predicted how people would react to it if it came to light. Most importantly, I’d understand that my actions would undermine the lockdown.Probably yes but then I’ve never been in such a role.
My personal view is that the pool of people you’d give your kid too is pretty limited, especially when there’s a good chance they’re infectious with a disease that’s killing quite a few people. I really do think it would be pretty limited to more immediate family members.Well, is there any immediate family in London for Cummings? He seems to be suggesting in his judgement he felt that he could drive for 5 hours without having to stop for fuel or to take his son to the toilet, potentially exposing other people to the virus was a more reasonable decision than finding someone locally to care for his son and potentially exposing them to the virus.
I think the focus will shift away from the initial journey even with the leaps of faith required to believe it and onto the journey back into London at more or less the same time as the peak of the pandemic.
None of them are acceptable, what the feck are you on about? Stop trying to steer the narrative away from an argument you have no answers for.so it would be ok for him to travel to the Midlands or Leeds for example? If 260 miles is not acceptable, would 30, 60, 90,150 miles.
Well obviously the longer the journey the greater the risk. As he himself highlighted when he mentioned having to pull over because people were sick, taking a shorter drive to "test his eyesight" and having to stop to get petrol.so it would be ok for him to travel to the Midlands or Leeds for example? If 260 miles is not acceptable, would 30, 60, 90,150 miles.
That's the best bit. Number 10 would have found him childcare. This whole thing has nothing to do with childcare and everything to do with the PM's chief political advisor, who has made himself the architect of the lockdown and invited himself to scientific briefings, making everyone make sacrifices and ignoring them himself because he thinks he's above it all and he wanted a holiday with his family to coincide with his missus' birthday. This is the story, not some philosophical debate over what is deemed acceptable childcare.And yet he clearly stated that he was going back to London to arrange child care.
Fixed that for you.Of course not. He went up there to have a quiet country getaway with his wife and kid and it coincided with a trip to a castle of his missus' birthday. If they could have snuck into a restaurant they would have so they took the best option available. Now he's been caught out and he's giving us his "dick accidentally fell into a pig " excuse.
I think so too. The other interesting point was when he was asked about getting things wrong in the pandemic, should have pushed him on that because now is the perfect time to get into not at some point in the future as he referred to.He made a point of saying there were three exceptional circumstances: 2 parents potentially being unable to take care of a 4 year old, the fact he works at #10, and the fact his house was a target of some kind. He let slip after about the 7th time of asking that some people might think "it's your own fault people were making threats at your house, that's not a good reason to leave" at this point in the press conference. I'm surprised no-one challenged him on that point he kept leaning on. He clearly chose to get out of London because it was his preference, not because it was the only choice he could make. He seemed genuinely oblivious to the fact that other parents have had to deal with worse situations.
I think he's swept it away well enough though. He's given the people that want to support him enough to work with, and that's all he needed to tip the balance on.
It's all starting to make sense now.Fixed that for you.