Westminster Politics

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,510
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
How the feck can you 'disapply' sections of an international treaty you no longer like without violating the agreement?
Yes exactly.
And of course, they/it is interwoven into the agreements the UK has with other countries.
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,550
Location
Manchester
Patrick Vallance evidence in he Covid Enquiry pretty damning.

A few highlights so far...
  • Boris couldn't understand any of the scientific advise he was given.
  • No10 wanted the scientific advised changed to suit policy.
  • Sunak said he wanted to "manage the scientists, not the virus".
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,071
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Patrick Vallance evidence in he Covid Enquiry pretty damning.

A few highlights so far...
  • Boris couldn't understand any of the scientific advise he was given.
  • No10 wanted the scientific advised changed to suit policy.
  • Sunak said he wanted to "manage the scientists, not the virus".
Now that's wild.
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,550
Location
Manchester
Sunak conveniently promising tax cuts today to try to take the headlines away from the Covid enquiry. Will probably work.
 

Mart1974

harbours delusions of insignificance
Joined
Nov 13, 2013
Messages
3,508
How the feck can you 'disapply' sections of an international treaty you no longer like without violating the agreement?
The same way you break the law in a very specific and limited way
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,550
Location
Manchester


Would usually be very easy for Sunak to just pass the blame to Boris, but the evidence is coming out that he's just as complicit. Hence his drastic attempts to get this out of the headlines.
 
Last edited:

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,507
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
Would usually be very easy for Sunak to just pass the blame to Boris, but the evidence is coming out that he's just as complicit. Hence his drastic attempts to get this out of the headlines.
There's something weird with the image, whatever it is. Malwarebytes calls it riskware.
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,267
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!

Herman Toothrot

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2021
Messages
1,764

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
The effect of the minimum wage increase in April will be interesting. From the point of view of our company, it's the first ever minimum wage increase that will mean the salary of some staff will be greater than their productive value.

Previously minimum wage levels were irrelevant as they were lower than what would be offered in a free market.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,854
Location
Florida

owlo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
3,252
The effect of the minimum wage increase in April will be interesting. From the point of view of our company, it's the first ever minimum wage increase that will mean the salary of some staff will be greater than their productive value.

Previously minimum wage levels were irrelevant as they were lower than what would be offered in a free market.
Doesn’t sound like a particularly well run company. I’d be looking for a new job.

'Their duty.'

Christ almighty.
Wonder how they’ll magic up those completely flexible jobs with understanding employers (who have to pay sick when their employee is temporarily ill) for people with little employment history or skills.

They want to depress uk productivity even more.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,921
Location
Cheshire
The effect of the minimum wage increase in April will be interesting. From the point of view of our company, it's the first ever minimum wage increase that will mean the salary of some staff will be greater than their productive value.

Previously minimum wage levels were irrelevant as they were lower than what would be offered in a free market.
Yep, it will be interesting. The business I'm at (retail) will have some significant impact, so it'll be interesting to see what the government ease in the background. Tomorrow's budget will still need some reversal on corporation tax back to 19% otherwise I can see a lot of small businesses struggling and I'd be surprised if we don't see an increase in job losses over the coming period. Certainly cost bases aren't reducing, and demand in the market is flat to declining.
 

owlo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
3,252
The effect of the minimum wage increase in April will be interesting. From the point of view of our company, it's the first ever minimum wage increase that will mean the salary of some staff will be greater than their productive value.

Previously minimum wage levels were irrelevant as they were lower than what would be offered in a free market.
Unemployment is below 5% anyway; Tory rhetoric aside, increasing productivity/health has to be the aim, as the economy is pretty full. Employment inflation is natural in this inelastic state anyway, and isn’t the biggest inflationary input.
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
Unemployment is below 5% anyway; Tory rhetoric aside, increasing productivity/health has to be the aim, as the economy is pretty full. Employment inflation is natural in this inelastic state anyway, and isn’t the biggest inflationary input.
Firstly demand for staff has already reduced considerably with vacancies down a third from around 1.3m to 950k.

Secondly the amount of people deemed economically inactive has increased by around half a million people over the last four years. Bearing in mind the definition for this is simply someone who hasn't looked for a job in the last 4 weeks or can't start employment within the next 2 weeks. Literally someone out of work who is going on holiday for a fortnight isn't counted within the official figures. There are also 5m more people on disability benefits than 20 years ago (rising from 18 to 24%).

It's of course in the government's interests to make out unemployment figures are very low, but a quick look under the bonnet and you find the true picture to be less rosy.

My view is this aggressive minimum wage increase, if not mitigated with cuts in corporate taxes, is going to throw petrol on that trend, particularly at the younger and more inexperienced level. Why employ a junior member of staff when you can employ someone with 10 years experience for the same salary? Why build a balanced team with junior, mid-level and senior staff when you can simply increase the hours of the more senior people by 10% and cut the jobs of the least experienced. That young person then quickly ends up part of those increasing disability statistics.
 

Superden

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
2,110
I wonder if the thresholds for benefits like nhs charges exemptions etc will rise, otherwise lots and lots of people will be taken out of nhs support with dentistry etc. Its one way of reducing nhs dentistry crisis..
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,505
Firstly demand for staff has already reduced considerably with vacancies down a third from around 1.3m to 950k.

Secondly the amount of people deemed economically inactive has increased by around half a million people over the last four years. Bearing in mind the definition for this is simply someone who hasn't looked for a job in the last 4 weeks or can't start employment within the next 2 weeks. Literally someone out of work who is going on holiday for a fortnight isn't counted within the official figures. There are also 5m more people on disability benefits than 20 years ago (rising from 18 to 24%).

It's of course in the government's interests to make out unemployment figures are very low, but a quick look under the bonnet and you find the true picture to be less rosy.

My view is this aggressive minimum wage increase, if not mitigated with cuts in corporate taxes, is going to throw petrol on that trend, particularly at the younger and more inexperienced level. Why employ a junior member of staff when you can employ someone with 10 years experience for the same salary? Why build a balanced team with junior, mid-level and senior staff when you can simply increase the hours of the more senior people by 10% and cut the jobs of the least experienced. That young person then quickly ends up part of those increasing disability statistics.
Are you saying 24% of the UK population is on disability benefits?
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,884
Supports
A Free Palestine
Patient privacy fears as US spy tech firm Palantir wins £330m NHS contract
Awarding of contract to create new data platform prompts immediate concerns about security of medical records


The NHS has sparked controversy by handing the US spy tech company Palantir a £330m contract to create a huge new data platform, leading to privacy concerns around patients’ medical details.

The move immediately prompted concerns about the security and privacy of patient medical records and the suitability of Palantir to be given access to and oversight of such sensitive material.

Patient privacy fears as US spy tech firm Palantir wins £330m NHS contract | NHS | The Guardian
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,583
Firstly demand for staff has already reduced considerably with vacancies down a third from around 1.3m to 950k.

Secondly the amount of people deemed economically inactive has increased by around half a million people over the last four years. Bearing in mind the definition for this is simply someone who hasn't looked for a job in the last 4 weeks or can't start employment within the next 2 weeks. Literally someone out of work who is going on holiday for a fortnight isn't counted within the official figures. There are also 5m more people on disability benefits than 20 years ago (rising from 18 to 24%).

It's of course in the government's interests to make out unemployment figures are very low, but a quick look under the bonnet and you find the true picture to be less rosy.

My view is this aggressive minimum wage increase, if not mitigated with cuts in corporate taxes, is going to throw petrol on that trend, particularly at the younger and more inexperienced level. Why employ a junior member of staff when you can employ someone with 10 years experience for the same salary? Why build a balanced team with junior, mid-level and senior staff when you can simply increase the hours of the more senior people by 10% and cut the jobs of the least experienced. That young person then quickly ends up part of those increasing disability statistics.
There's only 2.4m on disability benefits now, whereas the number entitled to it has gone up to 6.3m.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,720
The effect of the minimum wage increase in April will be interesting. From the point of view of our company, it's the first ever minimum wage increase that will mean the salary of some staff will be greater than their productive value.

Previously minimum wage levels were irrelevant as they were lower than what would be offered in a free market.
What is often overlooked with 'minimum this and maximum that' is the basics.
Unless they are a co-operative, most businesses are not run for the benefit of the workers, but the owners and investors. Once the investment/successful running of a business disappears, through poor management or government regulation, price or wage fixing, or a market place collapse (e.g horse drawn taxis) then the business disappears and so do the jobs.
Most of the time the situation is stacked against the workers, the best they can hope for is a 0-0 draw, occasionally if the workers have specialist skills that are in short supply etc. then for a short period they might take a 1-0 lead, but in the second half the owners and managers pull it back to 1-1 then overtime, to survive, they have to get to a 1-2 winning position.

Conflict, e.g. strikes/ go slows/overtime bans etc. may gain a slight advantage for the workers, but it wont last, if it does, they eventually lose their jobs.

Government intervention e.g. with minimum wage etc. can improve things for certain groups of workers, for a short time, but for the vast majority of workers above this figure it doesn't work, and can under certain circumstances become detrimental, pricing out of markets

We need a complete overhaul of the economy, including employment opportunities and developments as well as new areas of business that cover our strengths, and also give opportunities to workers to participate in shaping their employment situations. There will be, as in business matters already; high risk jobs, medium risk jobs and low risks jobs, pay and conditions will follow. Jobs provided in essential services will have their own risk levels, but there must be safeguards for the individuals.

Everyone leaving formal education should have job identified (not an offer) for them before they leave, the trick will be to identify the range of jobs required and assess the needs including pay required. Many of these employment opportunities will need to be identified especially where individuals have problems of a personal nature, but they cannot be left out, everyone gets a job of some kind, this is not a job offer, but a legal requirement to be employed...a bit like national service use to be!

Sir Keir Starmer this is your big chance to make Labour, in the future seen as 'the natural party of government' by changing the lives of millions of your people, to give everybody a chance... and by the way housing, (and other basic needs want seeing too as well) when the massive Labour majority is returned at the next GE.