Mayweather v Pacquiao (2 May 2015) | NO requesting streams/rivers etc in this thread

Who will win ?


  • Total voters
    184
  • Poll closed .

Fener1907

Full Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,102
Location
Istanchester
Nah it's rubbish. The storyline was the biggest thing about the fight. No one holds up the Juventus Milan final of 2003 as anything special.
A storyline, eh. Seemed like the same old shite, albeit on a bigger scale. This is the guy to dethrone Mayweather because he has an approach that he won't be able to handle. Years earlier and I might have bought into it.
 

Kazi

Full Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
11,320
Location
SIIIUUUUUU
Reports that Manny was fighting with an injured shoulder that he picked up in training camp a few weeks ago. Might need surgery.

Anyway, if people want to watch an entertaining fight, watch Canelo-Kirkland next Saturday.
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,771
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
Some people seem to think getting hit less while hitting more is a sign of cowardice rather than being the better fighter. If that isn't a lack of knowledge then they certainly have a very strange view of boxing.

I get people saying it wasn't a great fight (it was fairly poor really) but this "running away" nonsense is insane.
Its kind of funny that Mayweather is so consistently respected by athletes outside his sport. His best attributes like concentration, footwork, patience translate to other sports and they admire how hard it is to do it so consistently well and be undefeated.

Mayweather is an asshole but his strength is that he can check his whole ego and the TMT persona outside when he enters the ring and stays in his lane throughout the match.

It was funny hearing his dad screaming at him to throw more punches and he was just sitting there chilling by his lone self. :lol:
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
I never said he ran away. I thought he (Floyd) landed quality punches, and overall the decision was fair. But it made for a very boring fight, and if this is the best the sport has to offer, then it's shit.

And his style of defense is very very monotonous. Get to the ropes, duck down, grab the waist. Is that really genius? I will say his counter game is excellent, but apart from that, meh.



Nah it's rubbish. The storyline was the biggest thing about the fight. No one holds up the Juventus Milan final of 2003 as anything special.
I wasn't saying you said it, I was on about the other posters we may have been (ever so slightly) smug towards.

Yeah, it sort of is genius in that hardly anybody can fight like that so well. His technique and intelligence is insane. Manny wasn't able to hit him, wasn't able to stop getting hit and wasn't able to force him to change up what he was doing. Bit like saying tikki taka is just a load of easy short passes, it underplays the difficulty of actually executing things like that. He's ruthlessly efficient. Not that Manny really did enough to test him that much either, mind.

You're right though, this fight was always going to be more about the occasion than the actual fight. I certainly wasn't going to pay for it.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Its kind of funny that Mayweather is so consistently respected by athletes outside his sport. His best attributes like concentration, footwork, patience translate to other sports and they admire how hard it is to do it so consistently well and be undefeated.

Mayweather is an asshole but his strength is that he can check his whole ego and the TMT persona outside when he enters the ring and stays in his lane throughout the match.

It was funny hearing his dad screaming at him to throw more punches and he was just sitting there chilling by his lone self. :lol:
Yeah, Mayweather won't ever be goaded into taking risks in the ring. He is always ice cold in there, it is one of his greatest strengths.

You need to work the jab to beat Mayweather. Pacquiao isn't that boxer anyway and with his reach disadvantage he had no chance of doing that whatsoever. I should have listened to logic before the fight but I got carried away with what I wanted to happen and tried to convince myself of ways that Pacquiao could win.

It was a good lesson in objectivity for me.
 

Insanity

Most apt username 2015
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,523
Location
Location
The best moment of the whole event for me was when the camera panned on the Mayweather family and smug little thugs wearing bling started making gangster gestures. It was surreal. My buddy and I had a good chuckle.
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
Floyd is a brilliant boxer. For all the bullshit off the ring once the fight starts he's all discipline and precision. He keeps emotions out of it, sticks to the tactics and executes them perfectly.
Yes, the fight was dull, but it was up to Manny to challenge Mayweather and break him down. Floyd is a better fighter than Pacman in every aspect, except maybe punching power. Pacquiao's only shot was getting close enough to do some damage, but Mayweather is too good to give him that opportunity and his counter is very dangerous, too.

A lot of people wanted Manny to win because they liked his humility which is opposite of everything Floyd stands for, but as far as boxing goes, Mayweather is different class.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Actually the possession football comparison is pretty apt. Takes a lot of technique and intelligence, can be compelling if you're of a certain mind but a load of people think it's as boring as feck. That was the boxing equivalent of one of those sterile Spanish wins where they're way better than the opposition in nearly every facet of the game and get an unbelievably comfortable 1-0 win.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,853
Actually the possession football comparison is pretty apt. Takes a lot of technique and intelligence, can be compelling if you're of a certain mind but a load of people think it's as boring as feck. That was the boxing equivalent of one of those sterile Spanish wins where they're way better than the opposition in nearly every facet of the game and get an unbelievably comfortable 1-0 win.
Very few people found Spain's succession of 1-0 wins in the World Cup to be particularly enjoyable or praise-worthy performances, though. They were forced to play that way because of how the opposition set up against them and they grinded out wins. They got a lot more praise for the two Euro wins either side of it because they played a lot more attractive football.

Mayweather does the same thing no matter who he plays against, seemingly.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,644
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
Actually the possession football comparison is pretty apt. Takes a lot of technique and intelligence, can be compelling if you're of a certain mind but a load of people think it's as boring as feck. That was the boxing equivalent of one of those sterile Spanish wins where they're way better than the opposition in nearly every facet of the game and get an unbelievably comfortable 1-0 win.
What is the "anti-football", park the bus equivalent in boxing then? An unskilled slogger throwing hopeful haymakers? It can't be, that's too entertaining!

Mayweather is Chelsea, he just shuts his opponent down, ignores those who call him boring and wins while others moan about his style not being attractive enough.
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,782
Location
Mumbai
Such a disappointment. The first time I've actually waited in anticipation for a boxing match and then seen it too.

For all of Mayweather's obvious techincal superiority, I wanted to be entertained and wasn't. Manny wanted to fight, Mayweather just kept staying out of range and as soon as he came within it, simply went ahead and grabbed him. Why the feck is that not a point deduction when its clear why he's doing it?
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Very few people found Spain's succession of 1-0 wins in the World Cup to be particularly enjoyable or praise-worthy performances, though. They were forced to play that way because of how the opposition set up against them and they grinded out wins. They got a lot more praise for the two Euro wins either side of it because they played a lot more attractive football.

Mayweather does the same thing no matter who he plays against, seemingly.
Spain were still recognized as an excellent team though, weren't they? I don't remember anyone underplaying the actual difficulty of what they were doing or the scale of their achievement, even if they didn't really enjoy it.

Anyway, I can only stretch this comparison so far, they're very different sports. Expecting Mayweather to change his style is more like expecting Spain to change their possession philosophy, it's too much a part of their DNA to change so easily even if tactics for individual opponents do. It's just the way they go about things.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Such a disappointment. The first time I've actually waited in anticipation for a boxing match and then seen it too.

For all of Mayweather's obvious techincal superiority, I wanted to be entertained and wasn't. Manny wanted to fight, Mayweather just kept staying out of range and as soon as he came within it, simply went ahead and grabbed him. Why the feck is that not a point deduction when its clear why he's doing it?
Yeah, thought the ref could have been a bit firmer on that.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
What is the "anti-football", park the bus equivalent in boxing then? An unskilled slogger throwing hopeful haymakers? It can't be, that's too entertaining!

Mayweather is Chelsea, he just shuts his opponent down, ignores those who call him boring and wins while others moan about his style not being attractive enough.
I guess it would be someone huddled in the corner with their hands over their head for the entire 12 rounds, doesn't really translate across. :lol:

Difference between Floyd and Chelsea is that he controlled the fight, threw more punches, landed more punches and was more accurate. If Chelsea spent a game parking the bus while simultaneously controlling the game, creating more chances and scoring more goals then people probably wouldn't complain about them quite so much.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
These same type of things are said after every Mayweather fight. What do people expect? It is like going to a Richard Linklater film and complaining about a lack of a plot. This is how Mayweather fights.He is defensive technician and a great counter puncher so this is the style he will use.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,644
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
I guess it would be someone huddled in the corner with their hands over their head for the entire 12 rounds, doesn't really translate across. :lol:

Difference between Floyd and Chelsea is that he controlled the fight, threw more punches, landed more punches and was more accurate. If Chelsea spent a game parking the bus while simultaneously controlling the game, creating more chances and scoring more goals then people probably wouldn't complain about them quite so much.
People will still complain about something! When United and Fergie was in his pomp, winning it all there were those accusing him of having the refs in his pocket. Moaning bitches will always find something to moan and bitch about.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Manny Pacquiao's promoter Bob Arum claimed immediately after the defeat to Floyd Mayweather that the Nevada State Athletic Commission had refused to allow the Filipino to have an injection into his shoulder which left him one-handed for the entire 12 rounds.

Arum told the Telegraph that the Commission had cleared his boxer to have a painkilling injection for the damaged shoulder - the same injury which Kobe Bryant suffered from - with Arum clearly deeply unhappy about this decision ahead of boxing's richest ever fight.

"It's going to take a long time to potentially have a rematch because Manny has a shoulder injury and we are particularly disappointed that the Commission refused to allow what had been agreed. I think Manny is going to need an operation."

Pacquiao admitted in his post-fight press conference that he did have an injured shoulder - a tear - during camp, and there was one point at which they might have thought about pulling out.

The shoulder then got better, explained the Filipino fighter.

Roach said:"The shoulder was bad and we thought about pulling out but then it got better." They reckon it was first injured three weeks ago.

Arum added: "The doctor who looked at it thought it was an old injury."

Pacquiao said: "By the third round I could feel the pain in my bad shoulder."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...loyd-Mayweather-fight-complains-Bob-Arum.html
 

dumbo

Don't Just Fly…Soar!
Scout
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
9,403
Location
Thucydides nuts
I find it absolutely bizarre that boxers have so much power in deciding who they can fight. Was it always like this?
Nah. It used to be decided by such unsavory types as the Mafia, Nation of Islam, the Third Reich and worst of all Don King.
 

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,404
Never lived up to the hype. Thought both boxers held back. Mayweather did show though why technically he stands head and shoulders above any boxer out there past and present.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
2 women dancing around avoiding to get hurt.

Today's fight was nothing other than money, no fighting, just money. The marketing/promoters guys deserve a lot more credit and money than fighters for fooling the public into believing this was fight of the century.
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,782
Location
Mumbai
2 women dancing around avoiding to get hurt.

Today's fight was nothing other than money, no fighting, just money. The marketing/promoters guys deserve a lot more credit and money than fighters for fooling the public into believing this was fight of the century.
Piaquiao did try and fight. Mayweather was evasive right from the 1st round and with him landing the counter punches the way he was, Piaquiao couldnt really go all out. I'm amazed he thought he was winning, could explain not going mental in the final few rounds atleast.
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
I actually found myself checking out some nice looking blonde sitting ringside for large periods of the fight, that was the highlight for me.
 
Last edited:

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,847
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
What is the "anti-football", park the bus equivalent in boxing then? An unskilled slogger throwing hopeful haymakers? It can't be, that's too entertaining!

Mayweather is Chelsea, he just shuts his opponent down, ignores those who call him boring and wins while others moan about his style not being attractive enough.
It's funny you should say that. I thought to myself during the fight, if this was Football it would be Mourinho vs Wenger.
 

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,404
Looking like it will be one more fight before he retires. Khan as once again thrown his hat into the ring. Love to see this happen, but it probably won't. A Khan /Pacquiao fight seems more likely.
 
Last edited:

Loublaze

ATLien
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
16,593
The best moment of the whole event for me was when the camera panned on the Mayweather family and smug little thugs wearing bling started making gangster gestures. It was surreal. My buddy and I had a good chuckle.
This comes across as racist and im not even joking
 

Oggmonster

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
4,932
Location
Manchester
Roach master plan was all based on the Oscar v Floyd fight. Oscar had some early success jabbing his way in and closing the range between himself and Mayweather. Unfortunately for Roach, Oscar' jab is much much better then Pac's.

I'm not too sure what their gameplan was? I thought they would try to overwhelm May with a lot of punches and look to steal it on the cards, but they couldn't do that. Most likely as they didn't anticipate floyd coming out, taking the centre of the ring and controlling the range so well. I mean even Maidana did a better job at unsettling Mayweather. The casuals will say Floyd made it boring, but why wasn't Pac throwing any meaningful punches.

Everyone has a plan until you get in the ring with Floyd. Floyd destroys the plans almost immediately.
Yeah seemed Floyd outsmarted them whatever their plan was as it pretty much looked like they didn't have once except a couple of rounds. Seemed pretty odd really, they'll know his knock out record has slipped drastically in recent years and realistically he wasnt going to knock Mayweather out, I'd guess you were right and the plan went out the window after 2-3 rounds (hence winning Round 4) and then Mayweather adapted again and made it very hard.

I think weight played a factor. The fights vs Maidana he had him struggling (althoug not in trouble) on the ropes, when Manny tried doing it Mayweather was bigger and too strong and comfortably rolled out the way, it really must of messed up the game plan.

Why are so many boxing fans in this thread being arrogant? Why not take the time to explain things instead of outright dismissing the opinions of those less familiar with the sport?

You can count the number of boxing matches I've watched on two hands but it's not difficult to appreciate that Mayweather dominated that fight because he was technically and tactically on another level. I might not appreciate the nuances of that but at an overall level it's very easy to see. I could see that in the Ali vs. Fraizer fight too. In fact I was completely entranced by that fight for that reason - I had no idea boxing tactics could be so absorbing.

I personally expected this fight to follow a similar pattern; Pacquiao/Fraizer the brawler vs. Ali/Mayweather the cunning technician. The same themes were there, it just didn't have the same appeal for obvious reasons. The intensity was much lower, the cunning technician landed a lot less significant blows and ultimately we saw a very safe fight from both fighters and that's where the fundamental difference lies. Yes, Pacquaio was out-thought and out-fought but it seems clear as day he wasn't anywhere near his best and didn't go all-out even when he was clearly losing, and because of that Mayweather never even got out of second gear. What's wrong with being disappointed about that?

We already knew going into this that the fight took place too late and that Pacquiao was past his best but even then I think it's not unfair at all to say he was below his best even by his current standards. Similarly Mayweather did enough but I can't believe that's him at his best. Calling that performance superb is just strange to me when he was barely even tested. You could say that Ali wasn't tested against Fraizer but the difference is very clear...Fraizer played his natural game, put everything into it and threw punches relentlessly but he just couldn't break that barrier, and Ali laid into him at key moments. Pacquiao on the other hand barely managed to string a few punches together and looked scared to really play his natural game while Mayweather just watched the clock tick away.

Ali could've won that fight on points easily too, he could've danced the night away while Fraizer tired himself out throwing useless punches, but he didn't because - as he said - he wanted to prove a point. He wanted to show he was the greatest not because of his win ratio or his technical superiority but because of his domination of every aspect of the game. He could play the tactical game, he could play the technical game and he could play the physical game. He was a crowd pleaser too. Mayweather wasn't interested in the latter two aspects and that counts against him in terms of this fight and his career. There's nothing wrong with pointing that out.

You can say that you can't compare boxing in different weight classes but I'm not saying I expected them to have the same strength or style, I'm just saying I expected the same intensity, competitiveness and entertainment. It didn't come close to that and that's almost entirely down to Mayweather, firstly for delaying the fight until Pacquiao was no longer a worthy challenger and secondly for playing so defensively even when he was so clearly superior. That will always lead to resentment - particularly from the casual fans - and I think justifiably so. It wasn't a great spectacle. The most interesting part of it was seeing how superior Mayweather was and that's not enough on its own.
I think the first sentence is a bit unfair really, through the early pages of this thread and over the last week plenty of people have had answered questions about stuff like fight start times, why they haven't fought each other etc and put links up to videos of them both which people could watch. IT may be different after a fight but then it can be frustrating to ready stuff like "Mayweather ran" or how Pacquiao was unlucky, the reality is the better fighter won. There's absolutely nothing wrong with only watching and enjoying big fights, the atmosphere and the build up can make a fight but then it can be frustrating for people who will watch more boxing to be dismissed as being clueless for example because they thought the less popular fighter rightfully won and it wasn't the worst fight ever. I'd take that fight over any Anthony Joshua fight for example, not saying I dislike Joshua but early knock outs don't really interest me greatly. You say yourself you can appreciated Mayweather dominated but it seems some people will refuse to believe that purely based on who he is, not just on this forum either which kind of makes a discussion with them about the fight pointless.

There's nothing wrong with being disappointed with that fight, plenty of people will be. If people have suggested that is "Casual" fans then maybe it's because it's how Mayweather has fought for years and it's not really a shock that he did it again. Of course it can be dull to watch but it takes 2 to tango. Manny and Freddie Roach should of known he fought like that and it seems they didn't. I'm personally more disappointed in Manny than Mayweather for fighting how he did.

Pacquiao has got older but so has Mayweather at the same time. They've both struggled in recent fights, Mayweather didn't look great in Mayweather vs Maidana I and Pacquiao got knocked out by Marquez...both of them have looked older in recent fights. It still should of been closer than it was last night really and Mayweather boxed perfectly to get the win. Is it Mayweather at his best ever?? Definitely not, he didn't need to be though and Manny never threatened him enough to make him get to those levels. To me it just seems unfair people seem to want to blame Mayweather, he won the fight. People should uestion the loser.

I think when people look back at Mayweather's career, especially if he finishes undefeated they will acknowledge the style but he'll point to the fact he fought everyone of any quality in the division and won and that's what matters to him. He isn't the best ever but he is up there with the best of his generation, I struggle to think of anyone who would come close really. Mourinho is a defensive coach butr when discussing the best ever in 20 years time I bet he gets mentioned.

EDIT: Forgot to mention I find the post match stuff form Manny a bit embarrassing, again if it was Mayweather he'd be slated for finding excuses like a shoulder injury. Getting outboxed that comfortably should be gracious in defeat really.
 
Last edited:

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,847
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
2 women dancing around avoiding to get hurt.

Today's fight was nothing other than money, no fighting, just money. The marketing/promoters guys deserve a lot more credit and money than fighters for fooling the public into believing this was fight of the century.
I don't necessarily agree with that. For me it showed why nobody can argue that boxing is not a sport and not just two people trying to hurt each other. Mayweather is an absolute nob but an absolute genius. He's a master tactician and used his head for 12 rounds, his defence was almost immaculate and he out pointed Pacquiao exactly as he will have set out to. His approach for the first two rounds killed him off, he needed to be going into the back 6 on the front foot but Mayweater struck early and made it an impossible task coming back from behind.

It's like any sport, it's easy to bitch and moan if it doesn't have Hollywood highlights but you ask any sportsman if he'd like to become the best in the world through pragmatism or be remembered as an incredibly exciting fighter and only the crazy ones will choose the latter. Anyone that thought this was going to live up to the billing was deluded. If you want to see a great fight pick two fighters with flaws to be exposed.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
I don't necessarily agree with that. For me it showed why nobody can argue that boxing is not a sport and not just two people trying to hurt each other. Mayweather is an absolute nob but an absolute genius. He's a master tactician and used his head for 12 rounds, his defence was almost immaculate and he out pointed Pacquiao exactly as he will have set out to. His approach for the first two rounds killed him off, he needed to be going into the back 6 on the front foot but Mayweater struck early and made it an impossible task coming back from behind.

It's like any sport, it's easy to bitch and moan if it doesn't have Hollywood highlights but you ask any sportsman if he'd like to become the best in the world through pragmatism or be remembered as an incredibly exciting fighter and only the crazy ones will choose the latter. Anyone that thought this was going to live up to the billing was deluded. If you want to see a great fight pick two fighters with flaws to be exposed.
I read someone very eloquently describe Mayweather to be like Chelsea. Efficient. Doing a job.

I personally think the greatest sportsmen will be remembered for being both entertainers and winners. Titles and medals are mere statistics.
 

Acole9

Outstanding
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
12,507
Manny Pacquiao's promoter Bob Arum claimed immediately after the defeat to Floyd Mayweather that the Nevada State Athletic Commission had refused to allow the Filipino to have an injection into his shoulder which left him one-handed for the entire 12 rounds.

Arum told the Telegraph that the Commission had cleared his boxer to have a painkilling injection for the damaged shoulder - the same injury which Kobe Bryant suffered from - with Arum clearly deeply unhappy about this decision ahead of boxing's richest ever fight.

"It's going to take a long time to potentially have a rematch because Manny has a shoulder injury and we are particularly disappointed that the Commission refused to allow what had been agreed. I think Manny is going to need an operation."

Pacquiao admitted in his post-fight press conference that he did have an injured shoulder - a tear - during camp, and there was one point at which they might have thought about pulling out.

The shoulder then got better, explained the Filipino fighter.

Roach said:"The shoulder was bad and we thought about pulling out but then it got better." They reckon it was first injured three weeks ago.

Arum added: "The doctor who looked at it thought it was an old injury."

Pacquiao said: "By the third round I could feel the pain in my bad shoulder."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...loyd-Mayweather-fight-complains-Bob-Arum.html
Here come the excuses, then he'll be wanting a rematch. Boxing is not the same sport it once was.
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,241
Location
Leve Palestina.
I'm no fan of Mayweather but surely folk can see he's a very skilled boxer? The thing is, ironically he's not a fighter I'd pay to watch, but I couldn't help but admire the way he made Pacquiao look completely toothless. That said if I had my way Manny would've KO 'd him in a slugfest... obviously that was never going to happen, so it was more hope than anything. I think Mayweather is a lot better than the 'park the bus' analogy but I can see why he'll always split opinion.
 

Wonder Pigeon

'Shelbourne FC Supporter'
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
21,640
Location
Forza Shelbourne
Supports
Shelbourne
The women that do be standing in the background with big smiles permanently plastered on their face, at like, press conferences and stuff, they're pretty creepy. F1 has them as well.

Um, also, a boxing opinion?
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
I'm no fan of Mayweather but surely folk can see he's a very skilled boxer? The thing is, ironically he's not a fighter I'd pay to watch, but I couldn't help but admire the way he made Pacquiao look completely toothless. That said if I had my way Manny would've KO 'd him in a slugfest... obviously that was never going to happen, so it was more hope than anything. I think Mayweather is a lot better than the 'park the bus' analogy but I can see why he'll always split opinion.
I think the park the bus is just wrong
I think peps barca is a more apt analogy.. You can't beat them if you cant get the ball off them and when you do they pressure you into giving it away almost instantly.
Similarly mayweather controls the distance and if you cant hit him you cant beat him... If you do manage to get inside he immediately ties you up in a clinch

It can be boring to watch both but you do have to admire the technical brilliance
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,974
The best moment of the whole event for me was when the camera panned on the Mayweather family and smug little thugs wearing bling started making gangster gestures. It was surreal. My buddy and I had a good chuckle.
Why are they thugs? And what gangster gestures?
 

Tommy

bigot with fetish for footballers getting fingered
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
10,672
Location
Birmingham
Supports
Liverpool
Finally home. I scored the fight 9/3 or perhaps 10/2 in Mayweathers favour, although I can kinda understand the 8/4 decision two of the judges gave.

Pretty glad I managed to catch the fight. I was rooting for Manny, but that performance from FMJ was just out of this world. Defensively, just a treat for the eyes. Comparisons to Mourinho are just ridiculous... We're not talking about a £500m team playing overly defensive against a £50m team. We're talking about one on one, same weight class... Why should he go all out against the more powerful puncher?

I don't know... Maybe it's more of a bout for the boxing fan, rather than the intrigued casual, but I found Mayweathers performance to be amazing.