giorno
boob novice
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 26,489
- Supports
- Real Madrid
Not knowing the rules comes to mindJust seen it again. Yeah, was tight but onside. Can't see what else the lino would have possibly raised his flag for though.
Not knowing the rules comes to mindJust seen it again. Yeah, was tight but onside. Can't see what else the lino would have possibly raised his flag for though.
It's waaay too long. Should not take more than 5 seconds. Especially the good goal, you only need to watch it once to see it's good, ref should've know the goal was good within 5 seconds(nevermind that the ref should have known it was a good goal all along)So long? Both times were less than a minute!
I thought it was because Vargas was ahead of the keeper.Just seen it again. Yeah, was tight but onside. Can't see what else the lino would have possibly raised his flag for though.
There were two defenders on the line though so not even close to being offside and I can't believe the officials at this level don't know the rules.I thought it was because Vargas was ahead of the keeper.
I totally can. A bigger angle camera would make it clearThere were two defenders on the line though so not even close to being offside and I can't believe the officials at this level don't know the rules.
Agreed! Unless there's a "play on" rule in the trial, that's all I can think of. But there's been no mention of anything like that.There were two defenders on the line though so not even close to being offside and I can't believe the officials at this level don't know the rules.
It's a trial. It's in the early days of development.The VAR system fecking sucks. It kills the game. I'm all for appropriate use of technology but the delay is far too big. What is required is technology which can make an instantaneous offside decision - indisputably, like the goal line tech - at the time the player makes the run. With microchips in shirts, that shouldn't be difficult.
I tend to agree.VAR is doing its job but I'm starting to wonder it might be better if it were used as an appeal process. Obviously frivolous appeals would have to be met with some kind of punishment (the manager being send to the stands or something) but it disrupts the flow of the game too much and not many seem to have a clear idea what's going on.
Football isn't science nor does it aim to be absolutely objective. Refs get decisions spot on most of the time and VAR should only be used in big incidents such as the shite offside decision the lino gave at the end.
I simply don't think it's imperative to rule out those absolutely marginal offside calls that they were used for today. But maybe that's just me
For us Brits, it is.Why do people complain so much for such benign matters?
Is there joy in complaining? Is it one of those little pleasures of life?
It's the right thing to do.
I see what you mean, but making the correct decision should be the most important thing.It needs to be an immediate call and it needs to be immediatly told to the people in the stadium and to the people at home. It will kill the game otherwise as you won't be able to celebrate a goal anymore and at the same time it won't end controversy as it's the ref that decides when to use or when not to use it. Cameroon could/should have been 1-0 up in this game for example for this:
The ref should have waited after the foul on Vidal, Cameroon would have scored and then he should have called for the technology. This is just the Confederations Cup, as soon as it starts happening around Europe next season I'm pretty sure most fans will turn on it. Imagine United scoring a winner in the last minute at Anfield and the agony of having to wait a minute to find out if it ws validated.
If you mean Fernando Fiore (https://twitter.com/fernandofiore), he's not Mexican. He's from Argentina.Lalas, Ian Wright, some rambunctious Mexican commentator, and a couple of other Americans. Horrible stuff.
Plus Giovani has no business near this squad. He's been a ghost since he joined the MLS.You sure of that? Osorio is weird man. He's obsessed with having players with height, hence why he's playing a CB as right back and Jimenez (ST) is playing as a wing forward instead of "Chucky" Lozano.
The problem is plenty of the top leagues will already use it next season when this should need to have a big evolution (they should experiment it in different ways) before getting to that stage.I see what you mean, but making the correct decision should be the most important thing.
That being said, I think they should make it similar to the appealing in tennis, where you have a select number of opportunities to appeal some calls that seem doubtful to you. If they're just revising every single goal, then I agree it'd be a huge overkill and it'd ruin things.
Pretty much how I felt tooI know, a lot are complaining, for a system that seems to bring a bit of more justice to the game
But wait until this happens in a united match, when they disallow a goal for an inch offside goal, after 1 minute of celebrations. Just imagine the match day thread in here.
Here in Chile we were all fuming after the first disallowed goal. And after the first and second legitimate goals i didnt celebrate the goals until i was sure they were gonna validate them, can you imagine how much thats sucks? They need to find a way to implement this system but to make the calls as fast as it gets, otherwise its horrendously intrusive with the way fans experience the football match. All of you saying we complain just for the sake of complaining, just think about it
Nope. Historically, sociologically and patently wrong.For us Brits, it is.
The situation they looked at was when Sanchez went through, not when Vargas scored.There were two defenders on the line though so not even close to being offside and I can't believe the officials at this level don't know the rules.
From my perspective this should be the main reason to implement it. By the advancements of technology and coverage football has nowadays the refs have been overwhelmed and exposed on regular basis for a long time, every weekend you would have people moaning on shit refereeing and while I also get mad at them many times I think this is the best way to improve the current situation.VAR looks great, only a few seconds to make things fair and remove human errors and also saves refs from getting abused. Just need to make it more transparent
They want all players to play at least once and Trapp and Ter Stegen already played last week....Leno starting ahead of Ter Stegen?
Just scoredMan I'm so happy that Stindl gets some minutes in an international competition. Not that he's great enough to start for the normal team, but I love the guy. Hardworking, great mentality, and deceptively good for appearing rather average.
Was a fan ever since he scored this when I watched live.
I think it's because all 3 goalies were to be given 1 game. So this is still Leno's 1 game whereas Ter Stegen and Trapp had theirs during the pre tournament friendlies.Leno starting ahead of Ter Stegen?
Germany has a goalkeeper no. 1. It is the battle for no. 2 and 3 next season - or the one that has the biggest chances if Neuer would get injured.I think it's because all 3 goalies were to be given 1 game. So this is still Leno's 1 game whereas Ter Stegen and Trapp had theirs during the pre tournament friendlies.
Alternatively wait until it happens in favour of us and then we'll all be applauding VAR for working and disallowing a goal correctly. Given the amount of bad goals given against England you're preaching to the wrong people.But wait until this happens in a united match, when they disallow a goal for an inch offside goal, after 1 minute of celebrations. Just imagine the match day thread in here.
Yes.Is Australia playing with their best team?
Yeah, had Australia much stronger in mind. Didn't expect our B/C-Team to outclass them so heavily (so far).Yes.
Best players but our tactics are so bad.
Shouldn't have said it, he hasn't done much of note since. :PBrandt has been brilliant!