What that game shown us, its not Maguire's fault that we concede so many goals and look terrible at the back.
Its a shame Maguire didn't play because it kind of ruins the Maguire agenda that he is the reason we concede goals.
So because our defence is equally bad with or without Maguire it means he is good enough? What kind of twisted logic is that?
Noone is arguing that Lindelöf, Telles, Dalot, AwB and maybe even Shaw and Varane arent good enough for us.
For some reason Maguire has a small group of hardcore groupies that cannot accept his flaws.
Yes Maguire works for England. So does Shaw.
But its a completely different system that suits Maguire much better. Low block, two dm's to cover for him. No intricate passing.
As soon as we tried to play progressively his weaknesses where clear as day to everyone.
And the same goes for a lot of our players.