buchansleftleg
Full Member
No...that would be sexist and less fun!You mean for the women team Right!?
No...that would be sexist and less fun!You mean for the women team Right!?
I doubt Rasmus would want to be introduce with the song "Pretty woman walking down the street" anyways what do i know people are more open to weird things today compare to the 90s...No...that would be sexist and less fun!
He's a self serving, cheating cnut. That's the credit I'll give him.
You got to give Pep some credit for being self-deprecating.
Yeah clearly more of an In The Shadows introI doubt Rasmus would want to be introduce with the song "Pretty woman walking down the street" anyways what do i know people are more open to weird things today compare to the 90s...
I don’t know how much we signed her for but I bet we overpaid."i heartily endorse this event or product"
Well he roams even if he is playing from the wing. You’ll see him come inside a lot and even come over to the left side. It’s just a tactical tweak, Bruno basically roams.Bruno on RW does not work. And will never work. Am I the only one who believes this?
ETH has tried that again, and again, and again, and again. It never worked. He can play Antony on the right, Sancho, Rashford, Mount, he can play fecking Maguire on RW. Why is he still playing Brune there? Apparently, ETH values Bruno, since he selected him as the captain. So, why does he torture him by playing him on RW? I really cannot understand this. Can someone explain it to me?
In my opinion, when Bruno plays on RW roams less than Antony.Well he roams even if he is playing from the wing. You’ll see him come inside a lot and even come over to the left side. It’s just a tactical tweak, Bruno basically roams.
He's had good games in the past there. Leicester last season come to mind. I prefer him in the middle though.Bruno on RW does not work. And will never work. Am I the only one who believes this?
ETH has tried that again, and again, and again, and again. It never worked. He can play Antony on the right, Sancho, Rashford, Mount, he can play fecking Maguire on RW. Why is he still playing Brune there? Apparently, ETH values Bruno, since he selected him as the captain. So, why does he torture him by playing him on RW? I really cannot understand this. Can someone explain it to me?
Antony dribbles with the ball more, Bruno moves more without?In my opinion, when Bruno plays on RW roams less than Antony.
Unless all of our many wingers fall down to injuries, playing Bruno there should not be an option at all.There's been more average games than good ones with Bruno there. It should be very much a last resort tactic for me.
It's a pity she's not rich enough to go full Delia.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What's a hiding to nothing?Ten Hag will be on a hiding to nothing if he does not bring in a world class striker, he simply cannot dress up a gaping wound with a plaster, that CF position
desperately requires major surgery.
What is the origin of the phrase hiding to nothing?What's a hiding to nothing?
Bruno and Garnacho were the most threatening players against Real Madrid. I’d argue whatever it was Ten Hag was trying with Bruno on the wing worked.Bruno on the wing needs to end as does Casemiro being given no help defensively in midfield. We might need a formation change as I'm no longer convinced we have the right personnel for a 4231.
Aren't contradicting yourself asking for another defensive minded midfielder but also the end of 4231?Bruno on the wing needs to end as does Casemiro being given no help defensively in midfield. We might need a formation change as I'm no longer convinced we have the right personnel for a 4231.
We mostly play 433 and yesterday was the first time we did more 4231 with Mainoo and then Eriksen deeper. Bruno has been playing deeper and both him and Mount will support Casemiro a fair amount.Bruno on the wing needs to end as does Casemiro being given no help defensively in midfield. We might need a formation change as I'm no longer convinced we have the right personnel for a 4231.
Agree Bruno on the right needs to die ASAP and Rashford in the middle should be gone very soon if we want to challenge.Bruno on RW does not work. And will never work. Am I the only one who believes this?
ETH has tried that again, and again, and again, and again. It never worked. He can play Antony on the right, Sancho, Rashford, Mount, he can play fecking Maguire on RW. Why is he still playing Brune there? Apparently, ETH values Bruno, since he selected him as the captain. So, why does he torture him by playing him on RW? I really cannot understand this. Can someone explain it to me?
Thanks, didn't know that one.What is the origin of the phrase hiding to nothing?
Etymology. From horse racing, hiding (“beating”); to (“as used to express gambling odds”), e.g., 6 to 1. Literally, the phrase can be described as to bet on a contest whose outcome is at worst a beating, or at best nothing.
That's what happens when you don't adhere to EtH's 83 principles, which he himself nailed to the doors of Carringtonberg.He seemed disgusted with our inability to put chances away. He's struggling more and more to hide it.
People think one striker can change this but the problems are a lot deeper than that. Signing a 20yr striker won't come close to sorting out our attack no matter how well he settles.
Currently Rashford is the only player that I would expect to put away a 1v1 in the team and that's terrible.
That's brilliant.That's what happens when you don't adhere to EtH's 83 principles, which he himself nailed to the doors of Carringtonberg.
NiceThat's what happens when you don't adhere to EtH's 83 principles, which he himself nailed to the doors of Carringtonberg.
Just buy Kane for him ffs. Give him the player he deserves.He seemed disgusted with our inability to put chances away. He's struggling more and more to hide it.
People think one striker can change this but the problems are a lot deeper than that. Signing a 20yr striker won't come close to sorting out our attack no matter how well he settles.
Currently Rashford is the only player that I would expect to put away a 1v1 in the team and that's terrible.
I agree so this is why the DOF communication comes into the fold surely someone has to have a hard conversation with the manager to suggest fixing the priority positions first before moving unto other targets ? Mount was likely the first signing because of interest from rivals but was the signing of MM more important by way of priority than perhaps a wide forward and a striker.He seemed disgusted with our inability to put chances away. He's struggling more and more to hide it.
People think one striker can change this but the problems are a lot deeper than that. Signing a 20yr striker won't come close to sorting out our attack no matter how well he settles.
Currently Rashford is the only player that I would expect to put away a 1v1 in the team and that's terrible.
We looked more proactive and balanced when we had two wingers and Bruno down the middle in the second half.Bruno and Garnacho were the most threatening players against Real Madrid. I’d argue whatever it was Ten Hag was trying with Bruno on the wing worked.
Normally Bruno as attacking mid is best, as a rw he offers other things than Antony.We looked more proactive and balanced when we had two wingers and Bruno down the middle in the second half.
My opinion is that we would have been more attacking and threatening if we had Bruno in the middle with Rashford, Antony and sancho /garnacho.
But I agree with another poster who said it was also about fitness, and Eriksen needed to get some minutes in and shake off the cobwebs.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's what happens when you don't adhere to EtH's 83 principles, which he himself nailed to the doors of Carringtonberg.