Alexis Sanchez | Done deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

RAVred

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 7, 2016
Messages
598
Still not done, still not convinced. But ever since he wanted to leave, I wondered why we weren't ever in for him. Premier league proven, can play in multiple positions, world class, and a workhorse.

I'd rather not offer Mkhi, and just pay cash. Get rid of mkhi for cash, even if its 20 mill, rather than whats effectively 5. We need to get the deadwood off our wage list though if we want to bring in a marquee signing or two in the summer, wouldnt be shocked to see young go despite having great form (in the summer) as his wages are ludicrous.
 

Raw

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
25,476
Location
Manchester, UK
Sane - Aguero - Sterling

Vs

Martial - Lukaku - Sanchez


Vs

Hazard - Morata - Willian/Pedro


Vs

Ali - Kane - Son


Vs

Salah - Firmino - Mane


Vs

......... Lacazette...............



Now, we are not looking so bad at all.
I can only wonder what Lacazette is thinking now. Get to play alongside Sanchez and Ozil then in a few months he'll have neither.
 

stygg

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Location
Sweden
A Liverpool mate told me he’s they’ll snatch him. Then I told him that a wee shit club like Liverpool can barely meet half of his wage demands.
Pogba needs to play further up the pitch.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,116
Fergie could have signed him in 09 and then again in 2011 before Barca signed him.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
17,133
One thing I don't understand after reading some Arsenal fan viewpoints on this.

When Van Persie left them because he wanted to win trophies at United, it was a betrayal and they hated him and us for it.

But now some of them seem willing to drive Sanchez up to City themselves for the opportunity to win a trophy that was already won before he gets there. Some of them seem to see it as some sort of virtuous, even heroic move on his part. Especially compared to a horrible, grubby, money driven move to United.

That irrational hatred at all costs is the reason City will never be a truly big club and United always will be.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,578
Location
Birmingham
This argument has one flaw.
City were going to pay 60m for him less than 6 months ago.
 

JMack1234

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
1,528
God i'm buzzing for this transfer. I've always admired Sanchez and genuinely over the moon that it looks like we're getting this guy. A world class player whose been consistently one of the best players in the league in a desperately average side. He could work wonders here.
 

Summit

"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
51,054
This argument has one flaw.
City were going to pay 60m for him less than 6 months ago.
:lol: If City was signing him it would be a fantastic deal. The pure hatred for us is beautiful.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
67,020
Hope you're on about Valencia.
I assumed he means Tony the Tiger.

With the high sugar content of Frostys the poor sod ended up diabetic, lost a leg... tragic stuff.

I am a bit flumoxed about what relevance it has to the topic though.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,972
If we do get him, it really isn't a signing that should be indicative of anything in the spending discussion. The figure quoted for one of the leagues best players in the last few seasons, in an area we need to improve, are fantastic business regardless of his contract.

What should we do? Ignore the chance, and spend 60m in the summer on a lesser player? Same figure has been quoted for Jonny Evans, it's no brainer. The guys itching for a money spending discussion and comparison with city will need to wait
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,645
This argument has one flaw.
City were going to pay 60m for him less than 6 months ago.
Well I, for one, am outraged we’re spending £200m+ on a 38 year old. Woodward is an idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.