Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,213
Location
Leve Palestina.
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
 

dove

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
7,899
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
We don't have enough info really to say who is best choice who is not. Qataris bid has obvious moral issues while Jim's bid has plenty of grey areas that we have no idea which way it will go.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,392
We don't have enough info really to say who is best choice who is not. Qataris bid has obvious moral issues while Jim's bid has plenty of grey areas that we have no idea which way it will go.
Correct, plus glazers will choose the best bid for them, rather than the best bid for the club. The opposite of the Abramovich situation.
 

Syphon Wallet

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
435
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
Just want the debt cleared, and the stadium refurbed/rebuilt to get us back on track, then I'm happy to only spend what we make.

Don't care if its Big Jim or Qatar tbh, only issue I have is the grey area surrounding what Jim will borrow and how it will be structured, would prefer no debt at all.

The above investment is only needed due to being bled by the glazers.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,605
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
With FFP, it's not like we can spend without restraint. Apparently we're only allowed to spend £100m net this summer anyway.
 

Andy_Cole

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
8,019
Location
Manchester
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
I just want the following:
Glazers gone
Clear our debt
£1bn invested in the club which the Glazers/ interest have taken out into Stadium and Infrastructure
A proper football structure in place
We spend what we earn, so are within FFP laws

I don't think Radcliffe can achieve that. Qatar can.
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
I just want the following:
Glazers gone
Clear our debt
£1bn invested in the club which the Glazers/ interest have taken out into Stadium and Infrastructure
A proper football structure in place
We spend what we earn, so are within FFP laws

I don't think Radcliffe can achieve that. Qatar can.
This is the least Utd deserve. This is what’s best for the club.
 

We need an rvn

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
3,874
Location
Down south...somewhere
Its quite possible, and then of course our stupid reactionary fans will jump on the new owners and proclaim them as rubbish when our next season starts badly. Modern football sucks. :rolleyes:
If the supposed FFP restraints that we have to adhere with regards to amount available to spend to this summer due to our debt , and we don't have the new funding in place to clear that debt by the summer, then it's a pretty big issue.

I don't think anyone who has the ability and eagerness to understand the financial situation will jump on the new owners should the above be the case - but it would look damn depressing if we have to keep a large number of players again for next season who shouldn't be here simply because we don't have the money to replace them.
 

DownRiver

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
768
:wenger:
He is a United fan after all. I just don’t see the gov having any influence, the Glazers are American owners, even if it means indirect investment in the Manchester area.

Al Thani can just give a text to up the bid, he doesn’t need to be there.
 

Antisocial

Has a Sony home cinema
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
15,661
I had a weird blast of nostalgia reading that, might watch the 1992 Royal Rumble again :lol:
:lol:

If it gets funded as far as the Hogan figure then I'd say that's the clearest sign yet the Glazers have sold the club and have gone on a spending spree :D
 

Ahriman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 10, 2019
Messages
104
He is a United fan after all. I just don’t see the gov having any influence, the Glazers are American owners, even if it means indirect investment in the Manchester area.

Al Thani can just give a text to up the bid, he doesn’t need to be there.
All just a massive coincidence then?
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,949
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
Why would we have bottomless pits of cash and why would we get bored? You know what's really boring? Watching City win the league for the next 10 years and beyond.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,949
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
:wenger:
Qatar are the biggest foreign investors into the British economy. From all the foreign investment that currently enters the UK, Qatar make up something like 34% of it, but of course, the line is buying United.

The UK economy can't grow without foreign investment so I'm not surprised he's flashing his arse in their direction if they've got more money to invest.
 

Shakesy

WW Head of Recruiting
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
9,986
Location
Directly under the sun... NOW!

The heart and soul of United's support that travel to Brighton on a Thursday night being told on Twitter that they're not proper fans because they held up a No To Qatar banner. Some of our Twitter fans are the absolute worst.
It's kinda cute how the world's tiniest banner, bravely held up by Heart and Soul, has upset Twitter.
 

7even

Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,219
Location
Lifetime vacation
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
What’s your definition of “best choice”?

Is funding a new stadium, invest in our infrastructure without adding more debt or use some sort of sponsor funded deal something we should include when assessing who’s the “best” potential owner?
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,477
Location
Cooper Station
Who cares about a banner. Does that fan have B fan shares or something that are worth 10x the normal fan opinion.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,460
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
I don't think anyone who has the ability and eagerness to understand the financial situation will jump on the new owners
The issue of ownership is already dividing and polarising the fan base. We saw the same thing with the whole stupid Ole in, Ole out thing in the last few years. There is a strange desire amongst United fans to be proven right, and to be seen as a superior to fellow fans. It’s weird and I don’t understand it but if we start next season under new owners badly there will absolutely be people who jump to blame the owners and their staffing team. If it goes REALLY badly then I can foresee protests again sadly.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,949
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
What’s your definition of “best choice”?

Is funding a new stadium, invest in our infrastructure without adding more debt or use some sort of sponsor funded deal something we should include when assessing who’s the “best” potential owner?
It's not the best choice for Manchester United, that's for sure.
 

humdinger

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
2,013
Location
Scotland
Surely Ratcliffe is the best choice? That's if we had one. And do people really want a bottomless pit of cash? You'd all get bored quick fast. He's our only decent option.
I’m personally a bit wary of him, but I’m also wary of the other bid. Both are better than the Glazers though, for me.

I think the Ratcliffe bid will win and would be best for the fan base as I think it will be less divisive and toxic. I won’t be happy if the parasites stay in any shape or form though.
 

MiamiSpartan

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
1,225
Location
Miami, FL, USA
What’s your definition of “best choice”?

Is funding a new stadium, invest in our infrastructure without adding more debt or use some sort of sponsor funded deal something we should include when assessing who’s the “best” potential owner?
Yes. And we should also include in that assessment whether the club will just be used as a foreign policy tool, and/or that the club will be linked to everything that government does, good and bad.
 

Amsterdam Devil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 10, 2021
Messages
613
Qatar are the biggest foreign investors into the British economy. From all the foreign investment that currently enters the UK, Qatar make up something like 34% of it, but of course, the line is buying United.

The UK economy can't grow without foreign investment so I'm not surprised he's flashing his arse in their direction if they've got more money to invest.
And all of Europe wants their liquid gas now because they don’t want gas from Russia anymore. German firms have signed a 15-year deal during the WC in Qatar to buy 2m tonnes of liquid gas from Qatar. Everybody wants that of course, who cares about the human rights issues. Shameful!
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,949
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
And all of Europe wants their liquid gas now because they don’t want gas from Russia anymore. German firms have signed a 15-year deal during the WC in Qatar to buy 2m tonnes of liquid gas from Qatar. Everybody wants that of course, who cares about the human rights issues. Shameful!
To be fair, Europeans freezing to death in their own homes is probably a more pressing human rights issue for the leaders of those countries that the plight of the immigrants of Qatar.
 

Ahriman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 10, 2019
Messages
104
I am sure, this bidding process was happening since Nov.

Why would he arrive AFTER the bidding process deadline has finished to create influence.
Who said anything about him influencing it. Of course he may have a lot more to discuss besides Man United, but the timing of Qatar being backed by our government and portrayed in a favourable light is too big of a coincidence, I wouldn't be surprised if we got some news real soon.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,306
All just a massive coincidence then?
Of course not. He was obviously in the country to seal the deal with the Glazers, and just happened to stop by to see his buddy Rishi and give him a few suitcases of cash.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,743
With FFP, it's not like we can spend without restraint. Apparently we're only allowed to spend £100m net this summer anyway.
That’s without player sales and is more to do with the clubs financials, posting a huge £115m loss which has increased the debt back to £635m and the interest will also go up to probably £40m per year to service now hopefully this years accounts won’t be so bad but if we lost £60m and still have a debt to service plus Amortised Transfer fees and wages of £300m it’s going to be very tough to do anything, which is why we need a full sale asap
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,541
Location
Salford
You'd think we'd start getting some news leaking about now about the likely outcome of those bids a week ago
 
Status
Not open for further replies.