Bestie07
Full Member
Two of the biggest clubs in the world, fighting like children
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
The anti-Data!Poorly written but possibly to avoid using stronger language. Still, I find the excessive use of contractions unforgivable.
Let's show him some love."The Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player"
from what I understand, his contract offer from us offers to backdate his wage increase to the start of last season.No way De Gea stays on his paltry (in comparison) wage for the full year I say.. not when he can double/triple his wage and get a great whacking signing on fee...
feck yeah, WoodyManchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The Club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts.
• Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell. • No offer was received for David until yesterday.
• At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford. The deals were dependent on each other.
• In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.
• Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 2042 BST. David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 2232 BST.
• At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk. • Only at 2255 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid.
• At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.
• At 2258 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline.
• It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:
- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)
- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline • The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The Club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.
Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
Fighting? This is a bloody knockout. A massive screw you Perez and feck Madrid by Manchester United.Two of the biggest clubs in the world, fighting like children
AmazingThe Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
Who said anything about accepting the first bid.. It just says the negotiations began yesterday afternoonYou accepted their first bid? Sounds like you really wanted him to stay.
There was obviously a lot of negotiating going on before any bid was made. Once an amount was agreed by both parties, the bid was officially made and accepted.You accepted their first bid? Sounds like you really wanted him to stay.
Perfect ending to it. A well written, conclusive statement from us. Well done to the club.Amazing
We were getting a replacement goalkeeper and a large sum of money for a keeper with less than one year left on his contract. We would have been silly not to accept regardless of how much we would prefer him to stay.You accepted their first bid? Sounds like you really wanted him to stay.
You live in the ring of Kerry area if I remember right. Super scenic place down there.Yeah, I get that, if you're used to tropical weather, it's probably a bit different.
I come from Ireland(an incredibly scenic part of Ireland, mind), so yeah.......
Same here, but there is certainly more chance now than just 2 days ago.I still can't see him being a United player beyond next summer.
In fairness earlier it was holloway calling us a joke even ballbag was saying the blame lay totally at Real's doorSky Sports have completely about faced on their opinion of Man Utd in this.
That sounds like a really good idea. It should be encouraged.If van Gaal let's him play again, maybe it would be a good idea to chant his name for 90 minutes every game and make him feel loved again.. Who knows his mind would change..
Don't get me wrong, it was a good offer. If United really wanted to keep him though, they'd just refuse the offer, not hope some moron in Madrid fecks up the paperwork.We were getting a replacement goalkeeper and a large sum of money for a keeper with less than one year left on his contract. We would have been silly not to accept regardless of how much we would prefer him to stay.