28
I would rather see him given chances and fail than be left wondering what could've been.He will get a run of matches and the tone here will shift from complaining about him never starting to complaining about how shite he is.
He's already on a long-term deal though. If we take up the one year option, his contract would go until 2026. Better off waiting until the end of the season and making a decision then.Not at all. At this age players are better to be held on long term deals (it’s not like he’s on massive wages) because they actually hold value even when they’re not playing that much. He does look quite quick from a standing start which is one thing Sancho/Antony aren’t so interesting to see if he starts.
Exactly correct. Will be the same with Amad too.He will get a run of matches and the tone here will shift from complaining about him never starting to complaining about how shite he is.
Nah. He may not do well but he's young and he was cheap so there won't any real vitriol.He will get a run of matches and the tone here will shift from complaining about him never starting to complaining about how shite he is.
I think it's more to do with ETH wanting a different type of player, there's nothing in what he and others have done on the pitch that suggests it's about earning it.Perhaps he hasn't amassed a good amount of game time at United because he hasn't earned it.
We agree it was a poor choice to begin with and absurd that he returned.Alaves may have been relagation fodder but Pellistri wasn't even among their few bright sparks and he didn't earn the trust of the manager to earn a good amount of playtime. Amad for instance still scored three good goals during his I'll advised loan spell at Rangers. He showed his quality in the face of adversity and bad conditions for his continued development
The crazy thing is the loan move and club was one of his and he's agent's choosing, and they elected to return for an even more disastrous second spell.
If Facundo doesn’t get the start under these circumstances he needs to be sold in January.
Yeah the cutback situation was a hair pulling situationComes on, puts in a nice cutback which no one picks up. Whereas Brighton score their 3 goals with the same kind of cutbacks.
Should have been brought on sooner. Sad, ETH doesn't rate him. Just move him on. 5mins every game doesn't help anyone.
ETH is clearly not as good as people hoped on here. Extremely stubborn and a bad man manager on top. It leads to nothing medium to long term, an unhappy squad.Yeah if he doest start playing more in the few games it means that ETH doesn't rate him at all. He ll definitely leave in January or next summer. No point keeping him.
I don't get it, ETH had a whole year to judge him, why do we keep a player if he will only play if Antony, Sancho, Diallo, Bruno are unavailable? Even then, we play with a diamond. That's not squad depth logic. That's just bad planning.
Hard to say he’s a bad man manager. This kind of style is good if the club is successful but starts to appear toxic when things go south. Case in point: Jose Mourinho.ETH is clearly not as good as people hoped on here. Extremely stubborn and a bad man manager on top. It leads to nothing medium to long term, an unhappy squad.
When he's come on he's usually done something like that, plays the ball into dangerous areas. What's even more annoying is that they had Lamptey at left back, so he would have had to defend against him on his wrong side.Comes on, puts in a nice cutback which no one picks up. Whereas Brighton score their 3 goals with the same kind of cutbacks.
Should have been brought on sooner. Sad, ETH doesn't rate him. Just move him on. 5mins every game doesn't help anyone.
When he's come on he's usually done something like that, plays the ball into dangerous areas. What's even more annoying is that they had Lamptey at left back, so he would have had to defend against him on his wrong side.
But the guy you spent 100m on to play right wing is out, so the obvious move is to change your whole setup so as not to play the only other right winger you have available.
Its infuriating. Losing at home by 2 goals and he waits for 5mins remaining before putting on Pellestri and Garnacho. All while having the majority of our attacking options out for one reason or another.Yea, it's infuriating. We didn't let him leave on loan and are now trying to give him a new contract and your manager would rather change the whole system before giving you a chance even when 4 other right wingers(Antony, Sancho, Amad, Greenwood) are out. Comes on for the usual 5mins when the game was lost anyways.
He'd be smart to not sign that contract and just request to leave. Fair enough if ETH doesn't trust him and thinks he's not good enough. Just don't keep him because of 'reasons'. He is not going to develop with 5mins every game.
ETH would have had way more leeway yesterday had he given chance to some of our youth.
Maybe because Ole signed VDB, fans expected a role or idea to use him.Reminds me of when Ole did not play VDB and fans were upset. Then Ole got sacked and VDB was shown to be complete shite
Yea, no problem with that. Just sell him if you think he's shit. We are not asking him to be our first choice right winger. We are asking why he is not starting when 4 other right wingers are out. Stop giving out pointless contracts to players who the manager thinks is rubbish. Sell him while he still has some value. We will end up giving him away on a free like Bailly if he never gets a chance.Reminds me of when Ole did not play VDB and fans were upset. Then Ole got sacked and VDB was shown to be complete shite
Even if he is shit (small evidence has shown he's not), we still won't know until he gets the chance and it's tragic when Scott fecking Mctominay gets to start over him.Reminds me of when Ole did not play VDB and fans were upset. Then Ole got sacked and VDB was shown to be complete shite
