As a neutral i posted in a forum few weeks back that i think if Utd had bought Raphinha off Leeds instead of Sancho, [not for same fee necessarily], then Raphinha could have quite possibly performed better for you, than Sancho has up to this point. And conceivably been a better signing, because although his standing in the game isnt as high profile as Sancho, he is still quality IMO. Because for me, Sancho has been woeful for the money paid, and albeit its early, he's been a flop thus far. As have some of our signings for big fees. Few users gave me stick for it, if i remember rightly.
In the same way i also posted that it's entirely possible, Emmanuel Dennis off Watford would have done better for us than Lukaku, if we'd signed him instead. I simply could not understand how people couldn't see my point i was making
You know something, if Saint Max could add more goals to his game, too, then i wouldnt blame you for swapping him for Sancho. He's better at going past people than Sancho is for one.
