- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 90,832
Yeah sounds like Sky did nothing wrong. She deserved to be confronted.
Exactly what Ramshock said. Here is link about it all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndromeSorry to sound ignorant but I have not really kept up to date with this case. Is there a specific reason to why this case is being pursued years after it happened as opposed to other cases which go on a 'backburner' after a while...?
Yeah sounds like Sky did nothing wrong. She deserved to be confronted.
From the very few tweets I've seen in articles about her, what she posted was fairly tame. She seemed very angry with the parents, presumably on the basis she thought they were somehow responsible for Madeleine's death. It wasn't the kind of really repulsive trolling you see from the type of low-lives who specialise in that sort of thing though. Came across more as someone who was just a bit thick, rather than anything more malignant.
I agree that that nobody should post stuff on social media anonymously that they wouldn't do in person but I don't really understand why this woman ended up getting door-stepped when there are so many other examples of genuinely unpleasant trolls for them to pick on. Unless I there are really bad tweets that didn't get mentioned in the press?
According to that reports she sent thousands of tweets on the subject. I think the sheer volume alone would probably make her a fair subject for that kind of interview.
Plus it might have been better for Sky to interview someone who could write something more coherent then "Mcanns r murderz wud stab dem 2 ded" or whatever.
Sky in the clear yeah? that will be a comfort to her family then
Don't be ridiculous. Blaming sky news.
Their reporters found out that she was one of the ones posting vile stuff about the McCanns and their surviving children, found her and asked her some pretty mild questions.
She then disappeared and has now apparently killed herself, perhaps faced with the fact that her disgusting words weren't as anonymous as she thought.
Sky News haven't done anything wrong here, unless you call exposing someone's darkest, most evil secrets as "wrong".
From the very few tweets I've seen in articles about her, what she posted was fairly tame. She seemed very angry with the parents, presumably on the basis she thought they were somehow responsible for Madeleine's death. It wasn't the kind of really repulsive trolling you see from the type of low-lives who specialise in that sort of thing though. Came across more as someone who was just a bit thick, rather than anything more malignant.
I agree that that nobody should post stuff on social media anonymously that they wouldn't do in person but I don't really understand why this woman ended up getting door-stepped when there are so many other examples of genuinely unpleasant trolls for them to pick on. Unless I there are really bad tweets that didn't get mentioned in the press?
Obviously sad that she's dead but it was her own decision. If someone from Sky asking her a few questions pushed her over the edge then it sounds like it wouldn't have taken much.
And now Katie Hopkins has stepped in to the argument. Hardly the kind of person you'd want in your corner imo.
What on earth has it got to do with her ?And now Katie Hopkins has stepped in to the argument. Hardly the kind of person you'd want in your corner imo.
It is a complete circus. Must be infuriating to Kate and Gerry McCann.
They created the circus to begin with, no sympathy.
They want their child back. You expect them to fade into the background? They're driven by a need and a fair amount of guilt. They've use a willing media but it's what 99.9% of parents would do.
Except that children go missing all the time, the families still look, hope and pray but the media don't persue it and yet this one drags on and on in the public eye.
They created it, they milked it and benefitted from it and they're continuing it for their own ends.
Except that children go missing all the time, the families still look, hope and pray but the media don't persue it and yet this one drags on and on in the public eye.
They created it, they milked it and benefitted from it and they're continuing it for their own ends.
Exactly.So, if you somehow manage to keep media attention focused on your missing daughter then you don't deserve sympathy when people start publicly abusing you and accusing you of murder? Very odd logic.
I get that a lot of people don't like the McCanns but you can't seriously criticise them for doing everything they can to keep attention focused on their missing child. Or at least you can't if you're a fair minded person.
There is a weird belief among some that somehow the McCanns are somehow loving the attention and keeping the Maddie case in the public eye for 'their own ends' as you say. Am sure any parent in the same situation would do the same thing.Except that children go missing all the time, the families still look, hope and pray but the media don't persue it and yet this one drags on and on in the public eye.
suitable
They created it, they milked it and benefitted from it and they're continuing it for their own ends.
Pretty much agree with Pexbo. If you decide to publish something on twitter then you should be prepared to stand over it in real life. If you can't handle being called out on the abuse you post then don't post abuse. I don't see why Sky wouldn't be entitled to question her about it.
Except that children go missing all the time, the families still look, hope and pray but the media don't persue it and yet this one drags on and on in the public eye.
They created it, they milked it and benefitted from it and they're continuing it for their own ends.
They want their child back. You expect them to fade into the background? They're driven by a need and a fair amount of guilt. They've use a willing media but it's what 99.9% of parents would do.
They created the circus to begin with, no sympathy.
wow, just wowExcept that children go missing all the time, the families still look, hope and pray but the media don't persue it and yet this one drags on and on in the public eye.
They created it, they milked it and benefitted from it and they're continuing it for their own ends.
It's a very sad case and I can't even begin to imagine the grief of losing a child , to have one die is bad enough but to not know what happened must be horrendous. They must luge with it every minute of the day. I know it's horrible of me but there is something so dislikeable about Gerry. I still feel sorry for him though
TBH, the McCann's recent campaign doesn't seem to me to be about online abuse...more about controlling the narrative that someone other than them is responsible for Madeleine's fate (whatever that may be).
TBH, the McCann's recent campaign doesn't seem to me to be about online abuse...more about controlling the narrative that someone other than them is responsible for Madeleine's fate (whatever that may be).
"We do not have any significant presence on social media or online and I've got grave concerns about our children as they grow up and start to access the internet in an unsupervised capacity.
"People are threatening to kidnap our children, people are threatening violence against Kate and myself."
TBH, the McCann's recent campaign doesn't seem to me to be about online abuse...more about controlling the narrative that someone other than them is responsible for Madeleine's fate (whatever that may be).
Yes you're completely correct in thatI don't think either of the parents come across as likeable, but like most people, we have a huge amount of sympathy and compassion for them. I don't really understand the media obsession, I think it must be encouraged by the parents, and they must have massively thick skin to continue to pursue it via the media, but have every right to do what they think is best to solve this puzzle. Other parents of missing children may shun the media, or they may wish they had the same amount of mass media attention, either way they probably wish that they had a fraction of the police effort going into their cases.
I don't think either of the parents come across as likeable, but like most people, we have a huge amount of sympathy and compassion for them. I don't really understand the media obsession, I think it must be encouraged by the parents, and they must have massively thick skin to continue to pursue it via the media, but have every right to do what they think is best to solve this puzzle. Other parents of missing children may shun the media, or they may wish they had the same amount of mass media attention, either way they probably wish that they had a fraction of the police effort going into their cases.
If my kid went missing I'd pursue every possible avenue, for as long as I could, to find them. And I'd guess having a thick skin wouldn't come into weathering the comments of a few morons on the internet.
Either way, the McCanns aren't to blame for the fact that other cases don't receive the same resources. For their part a considerable portion of the funds raised by their foundation go towards helping other parents in similar situations.
Except that children go missing all the time, the families still look, hope and pray but the media don't persue it and yet this one drags on and on in the public eye.
They created it, they milked it and benefitted from it and they're continuing it for their own ends.
So who else thinks that they were reckless and accident happened and they tried to cover it up. They look really guilty everytime I see them on tv.