We'll see if Pogba has it in him to transform himself into a DLP who can dictate the tempo like Scholes did towards the end of his career. Scholes simply had a superior football brain, even if Pogba is the better technician. Is Pogba better than early career Scholes? Maybe.
The later career thing is important, right? Up until his late 20s Scholes played a different role to Pogba, more like a number 10. So the kinds of passes he was trying to make were different. It was only later that he turned into a player who could sit in the centre circle and control a game. There's nothing to say that Pogba won't get better at that as he gets older.
When people talk about Pogba's much-discussed inconsistency no-one ever talks about how most really world-class midfielders only became really reliable with their passing and decision-making in their late 20s/early 30s. Before he was 29 or so, no-one thought Xavi was head and shoulders the best midfielder of his generation. Pirlo, Iniesta, Carrick, Scholes - the midfielders who were best at controlling a game all only learned how to do that in the later stages when they were older than Pogba is now.
I think Pogba's consistency has improved notably in the last 2 seasons. For all we talk about how often he loses the ball in dangerous areas by dribbling, that has barely happened in the last year or so (Switzerland being a notable exception, though I still think it's ridiculous that an attacking midfielder can lose the ball in the centre circle and be blamed entirely for the goal like that). That's because his awareness and football understanding is improving - like you'd expect.
Midfielders - especially the cerebral sort of midfielders like Pogba - keep developing really late into their careers. Xavi, scholes, Carrick, modric, pirlo all continued putting in brilliant performances and developing their game until they were 35 at least. I often feel like people talk about Pogba as if he's finished developing, and as if any flaws that exist in his game will just stay there forever.
?
