RAWK Goes Into Meltdown 2016-17 Edition
- Thread starter Xaviesta
- Start date
I thought this was funny:
Can anyone translate this into English?
Tried my best:Why are people banging on about good footy? did he play good footy at chelsea? and did demento play good footy near the end ? when ronaldo won it on his own? - Why are people talking about good football? Did Jose play god football at Chelsea? Did SAF played good football near the end of his career? We won a lot of things because Ronaldo was winning games on his own.
an people here were saying oh there shit there shit they will never win it - ????
this game against the twats seems a real biggie even by our standards, because if we win there it will kill them big time if it goes the other way? - The game against United is massive even by their standards, because if they win they will kill our momentum big time. If it goes the other way, no one knows.
Proper punctuation and the proper use of 'there/their/they're' would have helped that drivel of a post out immensely. Probably asking too much...
THIS IS THEM TALKING ABOUT US !!!!! 
and so is this, have they time-travelled back to 1991 over Xmas or something
Mourinho is shit, Manchester United is shit. I think I nailed it.
This confused me a lot. So they weren't concerned in 14-15 when we finished 8 points ahead of them? Or last season when we did by 6?
They are the David Moyes of football clubs. Full of self-pity about how everything is stacked against them, then, when they get even an inkling of success, exude such arrogance that you can't wait for the inevitable fall.
Football fans across the land don't call Liverpool 'Self Pity City' for nothing, you know
That first part of the post is absolutely bizarre. Why do they need 5 goals to win it but he then counts 7? And even if we take away the two disallowed goals to keep it at 5 why is the winner the fifth goal when the opposition has scored just two?
Some next level unstable mindframes over there who struggle with basic math.
Comedy gold them comments.
RAWK declares war on Modern Art:
That last one is hilarious
RAWK said:
These two amused me. The fact they think we'll 'grind out a draw' at home? With 70,000 fans cheering us on?
Also, win away against us, but draw at Hull away? Sorry what?
I'm a medical professional and would diagnose delusions of grandeur in these two.
Why do they keep acting like they are 30 points ahead of us in the table?.
I'l piss myself for days on end if we end up finishing higher than them at the end of the season.
I'l piss myself for days on end if we end up finishing higher than them at the end of the season.
Especially all these Einsteins' with their oh-so-clever, "they've gone from 6th to 6th LOLZ", completely ignoring the fact we were practically dead and buried 6-7 games ago, our league season in tatters, and now we're sitting here 2 points off top four and are in the best form out of all the teams in the league, bar Chelsea.
Exactly. The fact that we're still in the same place in the table seems to have made them forget how many points we've clawed back to put ourselves in contention again.
The nine-foot oven glove is killing me.
Ah, and this:
is made funnier by the sentence order, where I'm fairly sure he meant the pony-tailed tosser was called Frederico, and not his shirt.
Liverpool fans are great until you talk about football.
Sorry to rain on your parade but, whilst his syntax and general grammar is hardly exemplary, the preposition "in" separates the two common nouns ("tosser" and "shirt"). For your attempted insult to be correct, he would need a comma between "tosser" and "in". There isn't one, so you defer to the last noun in the sentence, in this case the pronoun "Frederico", as the modifier always comes before the noun.
The guy is probably still annoyed at Macheda's goal against Villa, or something like that.
Rain on my parade? Attempted insult? Calm down, lad. Just having a laugh because the sentence is oddly expressed. And you might be right about him being still upset about that Macheda goal (I gather he's not alone in that), but if that's the case he's gone and misspelled Federico!
It truly is an embarrassing forum.
"Ahhh well. To be fair Mourinho's playing a blinder so far, he's loaded up their wage bill, stunted the development of some fine young players, and has them playing shitly but juuuuust well enough that he's not going to get sacked at the end of the season."
"Ahhh well. To be fair Mourinho's playing a blinder so far, he's loaded up their wage bill, stunted the development of some fine young players, and has them playing shitly but juuuuust well enough that he's not going to get sacked at the end of the season."
Oh, and if we're going to get pedantic, a proper name is not a pronoun. I don't mind Liverpool fans on the Cafe, but I do have to wonder why they come into this thread and get all defensive, where all we're doing is laughing at RAWK.
I must admit to pissing myself laughing at them because
a) they're completely and utterly spot on about what everyone who isn't an 'artist' thinks and
b) nothing illustrates the supposed lack of culture and not 'getting' modern art and all it's pretentious bollocks as well as a scouser on a rant
For the rest of the posts, it's giving me that warm feeling that they're back to moaning about referees decisions going in our favour. We're getting somewhere when they're moaning about referees. It's doubly sweet when they're correct and there's sweet feck all they can do about it.
To be fair they are spot on about modern art. A load of pretentious posey shit done by talentless toss pieces.
So, Brendan Rodgers then?
You forgot la.
Mate that support group doesn't even realize that they've been below us spuds for the greater part of the last decade. Reason and logic do not apply to them.
Not every forum can be such a stellar representation of objectivity, reason, sanity, football knowledge and poetry talent that RAWK represents.
They should bare with us.
They should bare with us.
Has the ref for this game been named? I hope to feck they dont give it to Twattenburg.