.Rossi
ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Apparently soI think it is rather that Swansea didn't want him.
Apparently soI think it is rather that Swansea didn't want him.
Why? Because Swansea didn't hire Ryan Giggs you want them to be relegated?Looking forward to see how the Swansea fan forums will appear when they are relegated.
No. I like Swansea, they often fail result wise against our rivals, but they do give them a hard time.Why? Because Swansea didn't hire Ryan Giggs you want them to be relegated?
I wouldn't be able to say anything anyway, I hate clubs for far more petty reasons :') (West Brom comes to mind)No. I like Swansea, they often fail result wise against our rivals, but they do give them a hard time.
It was just a non-serious comment made in jest seeing those fan forums mentioned.
They could use Ryan, that's for sure.
Me too. Hoped I was wrong but it looks more and more likely. He doesn't seem keen to get going...... the longer he waits though, the more likely he won't get a chance at United. He'll still have the same problem of no experience.I've been of that view for a while now. Yes, he'll say all the right things about being prepared to work wherever but i don't believe him.
He's pretty dull. That's been a constant with his media appearances. He's not alone with that characteristic but most managers have a bit more about them when they want to talk about the game.Wonder why Giggs didn't impress? To be fair, he's not the greatest speaker. Perhaps a job in football behind the scenes is actually what would suit him instead..
I reckon that is what he will do, if the United job doesn't get handed to him on a platter.You also have to wonder what Giggs wants from a managerial career? The guy have won 13 PL titles, 4 FA Cups, 4 League Cups, 2 CL titles and a couple of those World Cups for club sides. He's already been there and done that, what's his motivation? If I was him I'll settle for one of those cosy pundit jobs, instead of taking such a stressful job as it is being a manager where I can only do what I've already done as a player.
The answer is right there in what you wrote. He is a competitor, the same things that drive players drive coaches and managers. He has a lifetime of competing, there is the motivation.You also have to wonder what Giggs wants from a managerial career? The guy have won 13 PL titles, 4 FA Cups, 4 League Cups, 2 CL titles and a couple of those World Cups for club sides. He's already been there and done that, what's his motivation? If I was him I'll settle for one of those cosy pundit jobs, instead of taking such a stressful job as it is being a manager where I can only do what I've already done as a player.
Jobs for the boys.He had reportedly penciled in Nicky Butt as part of his back room staff if he had got the job.
Why would Butt leave Man Utd? He's got a job for life having control of the youth teams, rather than being Giggs' Ass Man.Jobs for the boys.
..because he is his mate.Why would Butt leave Man Utd? He's got a job for life having control of the youth teams, rather than being Giggs' Ass Man.
It's what Sutton does best, he's a knobChris Sutton was making a fool of himself last night about this on 5live.
Well he's daft on the Giggs point but I'd take Bruce over Southgate too. Bruce has been a good manager.Chris Sutton was making a fool of himself last night about this on 5live. Apparently the Swansea job should've gone to Giggs because of who he is, and not Bradley who is an experienced manager. Aparently Giggs shouldn't even have to interview.
Sutton then went on to criticise The FA for giving the England job to a relatively inexperienced Southgate ahead of someone like Steve Bruce.
that's greatChris Sutton was making a fool of himself last night about this on 5live. Apparently the Swansea job should've gone to Giggs because of who he is, and not Bradley who is an experienced manager. Aparently Giggs shouldn't even have to interview.
Sutton then went on to criticise The FA for giving the England job to a relatively inexperienced Southgate ahead of someone like Steve Bruce.
If you haven't misquoted him, i really think some pundits don't engage their brain before opening their mouths.Chris Sutton was making a fool of himself last night about this on 5live. Apparently the Swansea job should've gone to Giggs because of who he is, and not Bradley who is an experienced manager. Aparently Giggs shouldn't even have to interview.
Sutton then went on to criticise The FA for giving the England job to a relatively inexperienced Southgate ahead of someone like Steve Bruce.
I find him really annoying.It's what Sutton does best, he's a knob
I think Danny Mills called him out on it (its downloadable). So many pundits just go on air and reel off the same il thought through nonsense. If you are going to say something controversial on air don't contradict yourself 20 mins later.If you haven't misquoted him, i really think some pundits don't engage their brain before opening their mouths.
Yeah i rate Brucey too, good manager, could do a Redknapp given the right opportunity.Well he's daft on the Giggs point but I'd take Bruce over Southgate too. Bruce has been a good manager.
I can imagine. Probs turned up expecting it to be a formality. The other guy will have given a presentation, will have evaluated the current squad. Identified weaknesses. Proposed solutions.Also, Giggs's interview for the Swansea job was underwhelming according Riath Al Samarrai who covers Swansea for the daily mail.
So much assumption, so much just dreamt up based on feck knows whatI can imagine. Probs turned up expecting it to be a formality. The other guy will have given a presentation, will have evaluated the current squad. Identified weaknesses. Proposed solutions.
Giggsy gives me the impression he'll have rocked up and said "Im Ryan Giggs, you know Class of 92. Ryan Giggs, played under Sir Alex"
I have stated that above. Maybe more perception than assumption.So much assumption, so much just dreamt up based on feck knows what
Tempted yes, but I think it's a far more prestigious and rewarding job being the overseer of United's youths development and attempting to bring it up to being the best in the world, than being a coach in a team of coaches in a precarious position at Swansea. Money isn't the issue I don't think I'd want a downgrade in my position (that he most likely loves) to go work with my mate, unless it was to open a zany bar which was home to loads of wacky characters with hilarious results...because he is his mate.
Both are wealthy, so money isn't an issue.
If money was not an issue and my best mate asked me to come to work with him at his new shop/office/club, I'd be tempted.
I don't think you have correctly perceived what his role entailed so maybe not.I have stated that above. Maybe more perception than assumption.
Maybe Giggs tactics can only work with top clubs. If he's allowed to lead Barcelona or Bayern then he would probably win somethingNothing will erase what Ryan Giggs did as a player but as a manager he has no credit in the bank. Why would he expect to be a contender for the Swansea job?
If great players made great managers Maradona's Argentina would've won the 2010 World Cup. Just because Giggs can play excellently it does not mean he can coach excellently.
I am surprised that Giggs seems to be holding out for a Premier League job. Yes, managing lower down won't teach him how to manage Man Utd. Managing anywhere else won't though, so why aim for a Premier League club? Why not try and take a job lower down the leagues and build a bit of a CV?
I fear that if Giggsy is waiting for a Premier League job he will be waiting for a long, long time. He would be better off seeing if there are opportunities in the Championship or League one, trying to get some promotions under his belt, and build his way up to bigger and bigger jobs. If the likes of Karanka and Stam were willing to start off lower down, why not Giggs?
like any interview i imagine - its about if you can envisage yourself working with the person and if they buy into your vision (as chairman) as to the direction of the club.I always wonder what goes on in football manager interviews. Unless they have something to say that is radical that will revolutionise the club it just seems more of a case to see if the guy is going to be a prick or not.
That's Sutton's modus operandi. He has assumed the negative ex-pro gig from Craig Burley and added some wummery to it.Chris Sutton was making a fool of himself last night about this on 5live. Apparently the Swansea job should've gone to Giggs because of who he is, and not Bradley who is an experienced manager. Aparently Giggs shouldn't even have to interview.
Sutton then went on to criticise The FA for giving the England job to a relatively inexperienced Southgate ahead of someone like Steve Bruce.