Regulus Arcturus Black
Full Member
No no, I don't.With all due respect, you think this small sample of specific subset (7%) is better than a bigger random sample (2.5%). That is only because you want it to be true. It is not how statistics and probabilities work.
I just passed on the reported info man.
And you should be intelligent enough to know that a test showing 2.5% that finishing a week ago, might actually increase a week later?
And there you go again, I pass on info, you think I'm reporting Sweden as God. It was factual info man, that I neither praised, nor slated Sweden for, what the feck is wrong with you @massi83 ? How can I praise the percentage of infected people, in what World does that even make sense? Stop creating a strawman ffs.You think Swedes are god, I understand that. Everybody makes mistakes here, Germans, Finns, Swedes everybody, it isn't impossible. If you provide me with a link where they break-down how they calculate the 5 days, I can take a look and probably agree with it. But there are so many things we don't know, that mistakes are obviously possible. That is why it is better to have sources from 5-10 countries, not just 1, whether Sweden, Ger, SKorea or elsewhere.
If anything, you have an issue in thinking you can "take a look and agree" with Karolinska Institut? how are you qualified for that massi? What do you work with?
Last edited: