I'm not ignoring it, but I don't know how much weight to place on the fact she was groomed as a child in this instance. I don't have sufficient knowledge of the law to understand the boundaries of criminal culpability, age and the role of outside of influencers, ie those grooming, and the fact she was clearly committing offences a few years into adulthood.
Plus the age of criminal responsibility is much lower than that of consent I understand, eg the Bulger killers being found guilty, which adds a further layer of confusion to me as a layman.
I don't think anyone in the thread is dismissing her actions, saying you can't blame her because she was groomed as a child. It is a factor though, albeit how much probably of one most people here have no idea, I certainly don't, and very few would surely argue against her deserving punishment- it should be in a British jail in my view, not through exclusion from the country.