Honestly? As dodgy as this one is I don't think the scandal is that they have been bought off or have been pressured not to run it. The scandal is how absolutely shocking reporting of science/academia is in general. Journalists simply do not understand what they are reporting on, and it gives people like Fiona Fox, in this instance, scope to exploit the ignorance.
Things like the Peer Review process are badly understood, and I don't really know why. Presumably because paying people with the credentials to comment on technical information is more expensive than shoving it the way of someone who will hash up something that will convince 90% of the general public.