FireballXL5
Full Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Messages
- 10,097
“We’re no longer voting conservative because they’re no longer punitive enough, nor racist enough”
cnuts. All of them.
“We’re no longer voting conservative because they’re no longer punitive enough, nor racist enough”
cnuts. All of them.
Wasn't she the one who said benefit recipients spend it all on booze and fags?"The problem is the benefits are too generous and being given to people who don't need them" "I don't get any benefits and lots of people round here are struggling and using food banks".
Has it crossed your mind that perhaps the money isn't really being spent on benefits then you absolute walloper?
You should never wish violence on people…
I was just reading that. Nurses should accept the 3% pay offer- that'll show Putin.I hate these guys so much.
Where was stopping Putin frkm winning when this country vited to drive itself off a cliff?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Where was stopping Putin frkm winning when this country vited to drive itself off a cliff?
@MaticmakerIs anyone over the age of four falling for this shit?
Striking UK workers playing into Putin’s hands, says Zahawi
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...workers-playing-into-putins-hands-says-zahawi
Now isn't that one of the most stupid statements ever in the history of humanity. And even that is an understatement.Is anyone over the age of four falling for this shit?
Striking UK workers playing into Putin’s hands, says Zahawi
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...workers-playing-into-putins-hands-says-zahawi
He's clearly not stupid though, he's just a cnut.Idiot says idiotic thing alert.
He has a history of saying stupid things and little else.He's clearly not stupid though, he's just a cnut.
Anyone over the age of 4 eh? ....more like over 74 in my case! @Pexbo
He says stupid, cnuty comments because those comments have worked to win voters in the past. Boris for example isn't stupid, he played up the bumbling fool act because it made him likable to voters. They carefully plan this out, this is the problem with Tories, they're smart (or employ smart people) and know how to appeal to casual voters (people who don't care much about politics). It's what makes them so dangerous.He has a history of saying stupid things and little else.
I think that's true for some of them, but this guy and Braverman are just idiots, along with being cnuts.He says stupid, cnuty comments because those comments have worked to win voters in the past. Boris for example isn't stupid, he played up the bumbling fool act because it made him likable to voters. They carefully plan this out, this is the problem with Tories, they're smart (or employ smart people) and know how to appeal to casual voters (people who don't care much about politics). It's what makes them so dangerous.
Granted it's a little early here, but what the feck is this person getting at?I hate these guys so much.
Where was stopping Putin from winning when this country voted to drive itself off a cliff?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Agents Johnson and Farage have already done Putin's bidding.Is anyone over the age of four falling for this shit?
Striking UK workers playing into Putin’s hands, says Zahawi
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...workers-playing-into-putins-hands-says-zahawi
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Honestly feck these guys. If these were olden times, their heads would be on pikes for being so corrupt and treating their public with contempt. Absolute cnuts. Let’s hope the next GE finishes off the Tory party for good.I hate these guys so much.
Where was stopping Putin from winning when this country voted to drive itself off a cliff?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I’d imagine @Maticmaker ‘because Starmer isn’t a real Labour leader’, ‘ Labour can no longer be trusted by workers’ or some such twaddle.
That's all true but they also drop massive clangers, particularly when speaking live or being asked unscreened questions, or totally misjudge public perception, eg the U-turn on school meals after initially rejecting Rashford's campaign.He says stupid, cnuty comments because those comments have worked to win voters in the past. Boris for example isn't stupid, he played up the bumbling fool act because it made him likable to voters. They carefully plan this out, this is the problem with Tories, they're smart (or employ smart people) and know how to appeal to casual voters (people who don't care much about politics). It's what makes them so dangerous.
I think Starmer is 'warming up' to the role and may yet prove his critics wrong, if he can restore the traditional Labour values/faith in the red wall seats, he will be well on his way to winning the next GE. Things are looking slightly better in Scotland, which is the real prize. Labour might just get a small minority without Scotland, but if they can win enough seats from both Unionists and Nationalist, in Scotland then they could finish up with a decent size majority at Westminster.I’d imagine @Maticmaker ‘because Starmer isn’t a real Labour leader’, ‘ Labour can no longer be trusted by workers’ or some such twaddle.
Doesn't surprise me, they're all at it. These private school boys are all messed upTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Why are you bothered about where a Labour leader sends their children to school? Clearly Starmer (for example) is rich and can afford to do that, if he thinks it’s better than a state school that’s been run into the ground after 12 years of Tory leadership, I wouldn’t argue any different.I think Starmer is 'warming up' to the role and may yet prove his critics wrong, if he can restore the traditional Labour values/faith in the red wall seats, he will be well on his way to winning the next GE. Things are looking slightly better in Scotland, which is the real prize. Labour might just get a small minority without Scotland, but if they can win enough seats from both Unionists and Nationalist, in Scotland then they could finish up with a decent size majority at Westminster.
Some of the Labour hierarchy still have doubtful ideals (in my opinion), "they practice to deceive" where (of course) many Tory politicians don't need to practice deceit, it is part of their DNA. However, Labour has its own set of 'carpet baggers' amongst its elite, who will sell out their heritage, if needs be... look where they send their kids to school, that is a good indicator, of not practicing what they preach.
Because it's a perfect example of not practicing what you preach. Labour has been in power, admittedly some time back, but could have made some positive changes to Education, they should have been standing on the shoulders of Giants, who introduced the original Education Act. What makes you think they will make any changes in the future ?Why are you bothered about where a Labour leader sends their children to school? Clearly Starmer (for example) is rich and can afford to do that, if he thinks it’s better than a state school that’s been run into the ground after 12 years of Tory leadership, I wouldn’t argue any different.
I’m far more bothered about what they plan to do to improve the education system going forward.
So you’d rather judge labour from years ago than the Tories for the last 12 that they’ve been in power? Bizarre way to look at itBecause it's a perfect example of not practicing what you preach. Labour has been in power, admittedly some time back, but could have made some positive changes to Education, they should have been standing on the shoulders of Giants, who introduced the original Education Act. What makes you think they will make any changes in the future ?
But they did make a number of positive changes to education.Because it's a perfect example of not practicing what you preach. Labour has been in power, admittedly some time back, but could have made some positive changes to Education, they should have been standing on the shoulders of Giants, who introduced the original Education Act. What makes you think they will make any changes in the future ?
All ugly looking feckers too.Doesn't surprise me, they're all at it. These private school boys are all messed up
Education education education was their mantra.But they did make a number of positive changes to education.
They invested heavily in new and upgraded school buildings.
And they vastly improved attainment standards by improving the national curriculum.
I think Labour's approach to education is a good microcosm of what they were generally very good at and what they were generally very bad at.But they did make a number of positive changes to education.
They invested heavily in new and upgraded school buildings.
And they vastly improved attainment standards by improving the national curriculum.
I was in education myself during Blair’s Labour so I won’t pretend to remember what they did while in power, however researching that now, I can see that there’s plenty of policies aimed at fixing things I would support currently.Because it's a perfect example of not practicing what you preach. Labour has been in power, admittedly some time back, but could have made some positive changes to Education, they should have been standing on the shoulders of Giants, who introduced the original Education Act. What makes you think they will make any changes in the future ?
I agree, they did do something, but it was equivalent to 'polishing the hood' and 'inflating the tyres', it did nothing about the things that make/should make the Education system an equal playing field. Even ignoring the existence of public schools (with charitable status) only being really available to the rich, or occasionally some extremely talented youngster from a 'sink' estate. The state system was given a 'lick of paint' and a bit of 'academy' type upgrades in achievement levels, by Labour, but no fundamental policies or new laws to demand and ensure every state school has the very best management, staffing and resources wherever it exists in the country.But they did make a number of positive changes to education.
They invested heavily in new and upgraded school buildings.
And they vastly improved attainment standards by improving the national curriculum.
It's not about judging the Tory Party, their 'leading lights' have no real feeling or time for state education, it's not where most Tory kids go, and they will pay lip service only. Labour should under Blair, and I admit he did make some minor changes (in the overall context), have bridged the chasm between state and private education once and for all in a way that would have changed the education system and the life of millions of ordinary folks for decades to come; and incidentally laid the foundations for economic growth.So you’d rather judge labour from years ago than the Tories for the last 12 that they’ve been in power? Bizarre way to look at it
It never is for you, is it?It's not about judging the Tory Party
Agree completely with this statement. Unfortunately this is the problem with many, many working class places in the UK. People angry at their lot in life want to know that somone else is worse off than them and being punished for it so they feel better about their bad life choices.“We’re no longer voting conservative because they’re no longer punitive enough, nor racist enough”
cnuts. All of them.