ctp
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 2,992
Who's better? You can certainly make a case for Klopp, but who else? Hecking, Weinzierl? Nah. Löw?Fixed that for ya.
Who's better? You can certainly make a case for Klopp, but who else? Hecking, Weinzierl? Nah. Löw?Fixed that for ya.
Why only Guardiola then? Out of the two, it is Klopp who has done well with financial restrictions and more limited players whereas Guardiola has spent big money to add to the world class players he already has in his career. Both are top managers but I don't understand why it should be only Guardiola for people to worry about. There are other managers out there who have more experience working with financial restrictions than Guardiola, so I do not see why it should be only him that they should sign if limited money is your concern. With that said, either him or Klopp would only go to City if they knew they would be backed financially and could get who they want.If I was a fan of Chelsea or United, I would only really be concerned if Pep went to City nobody else.the FFP restrictions on City are going cause problems for whoever goes to City.
If he took a year off, I really hope he is returning to German TV as an expert/analyst. He is highly entertaining!I wouldn't be surprised if he takes a year off from football...
12:30 BST, why?What a strange timing for it.
I meant, before the season's end.12:30 BST, why?
12:30 BST, why?
I know, sorry! Felt bad as soon as I wrote itI meant, before the season's end.
What exactly has Tuchel achieved so far at the highest Level?Who's better? You can certainly make a case for Klopp, but who else? Hecking, Weinzierl? Nah. Löw?
I guess it was impossible to keep under wraps once Tuchel declined the Hamburg job. There had to be a bigger story behind it the way it went down and it didn't take long for the better informed football writers in Germany to find out.What a strange timing for it.
No problem.I know, sorry! Felt bad as soon as I wrote it
I got a semi just reading thisI hope he goes to City and fecks them up the way he did to Dortmund.
It'd test the loyalty of a lot of Caftards, what with them getting a boner every time Klopp's name gets mentioned.
I hope he goes to City and fecks them up the way he did to Dortmund.
It'd test the loyalty of a lot of Caftards, what with them getting a boner every time Klopp's name gets mentioned.
That's true, in both cases it was maybe too much, it seems 4,5 years are the best time for him, after that he struggles to improve the team further and it gets worse. On the other side he hasn't managed a really top side with unlimited money, so we can't really say how he will do in the long run when he doesn't lose his best players every year. Guardola is seen as one of the best and he clearly is, but he also managed only the two best sides in Europe in the last few years and not a smaller, limited club, so it's difficult to compare them. Klopp is a very good coach and I like him, therefore I really don't want to see him at City, I would hate to hate himHe is a really good coach but his inconsistency is a bit of a problem.
Fair point.Why only Guardiola then? Out of the two, it is Klopp who has done well with financial restrictions and more limited players whereas Guardiola has spent big money to add to the world class players he already has in his career. Both are top managers but I don't understand why it should be only Guardiola for people to worry about. There are other managers out there who have more experience working with financial restrictions than Guardiola, so I do not see why it should be only him that they should sign if limited money is your concern. With that said, either him or Klopp would only go to City if they knew they would be backed financially and could get who they want.
No we're not - Wenger is here til 2017 at least probably 2020.Have to say I'm enjoying the delicious irony of this happening at the exact moment Arsenal are on their best run in years. Arsenal would be all over this if it happened before Christmans but now? Timing is all wrong. Gooners must be so conflicted right now. Hehe.
That would have been way too late for Dortmund and for any club who is interested in employing Klopp.I meant, before the season's end.
Good point. Ouch. Didn't even think about that.If he takes a sabbatical, wouldn't Bayern be looking for a manager in 2016? Isn't that when Pep's contract is up?
They like to line people up and announce things early tooGood point. Ouch. Didn't even think about that.
You're understating it honestly.He is a really good coach but his inconsistency is a bit of a problem.
Even with Klopp leaving, Dortmund will do their best to make sure there's not an exodus of players. Can see Hummels and Gundogan leaving. Thats it.Reus is surely available again this summer then? I thought having Klopp would've played a big part in him signing a new contract.
Good young german coach, had good seasons with Mainz and brought them into the EL. I think he is a little bit overrated, because everyone really wants to see a Klopp 2.0 in him (german, young, crazy, Mainz and now Dortmund^^). But he is a good coach and potentially very good, just has to prove more for me. Dortmund will be the test for him, I can see Hummels, Gündogan and Reus leaving now, will be a big transition, but he will also have a lot of money to build his own team. Could be interestingWhats up with that Tuchel guy, dont know much about him.
Let´s see.What exactly has Tuchel achieved so far at the highest Level?
Not better than Simeone.You're understating it honestly.
I'd place Guardiola and Mourinho ahead of him. That's it.