Romelu Lukaku | United confirm deal subject to medical and personal terms

How do you feel about the imminent signing of Romelu Lukaku?

  • Muppetastic!

    Votes: 456 20.6%
  • Happy enough

    Votes: 1,222 55.2%
  • Ambivalent

    Votes: 370 16.7%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 112 5.1%
  • Oh please god no!

    Votes: 54 2.4%

  • Total voters
    2,214
Status
Not open for further replies.

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,802
Not a Harry Kane vs Lukaku thread. Anyone wants to debate it, do it a different thread.
 

Sheldon69

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
868
For a £100 million pound deal he's not technically good enough for that sort of money and in theory is like a heskey that scores goals .

I wasn't thrilled when I heard we had signed him but if you look at last seasons problems , it was killing the average teams off and we were drawing to many games against the so called lesser teams .
Lukaku has been labelled as "just scoring against the lesser teams " a tag that I have labelled him myself on here in previous posts.
Maybe , thinking about it he's exactly what we need right now to eradicate last years failings .

His record virtually gaurentees 25 goals a season and his goal scoring record for Everton against the big 6 last season maybe tells a story of tactics more than anything .
Everton surely would sit deeper against the big teams and lukaku would be be more detached , starving him of chances.

I hope he does well and I'm still convinced greizmann will follow once athleticos ban as been lifted .
 

M4YON

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
3,956
Location
Manchester
Take out the pens.

Last two seasons goals from open play:

Lukaku 23+ 17=40
Kane 25 + 20 =45

Assists


Lukaku 12
Kane 8

Goals and Assists combined.

52v 53.

Not much in it.
Pssst! If it's not a statistic that makes Kane look better, its not relevant to him.

Can't reason with stupid I'm afraid.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
right, so mystic meg stuff then? :lol: i'd hazard a guess that "3+3=8 if you're smart enough" reasoning is how most tabloids write their columns

anyway this isn't even amusing anymore. maybe you're right and we'll sell him to psg.
Equally as pointless as talking to a wall. Move on and have a nice day.
 

Hans Moleman

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
2,849
Kane is better than Lukaku

If Kane was in the market now, he'd probably cost £125m upfront minimum. Maybe more, considering it's Levy.

Is this even a discussion? Shame every thread has to become about GlastonSpur, even when he's right
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,844
who cares really though? :lol:

The fee could be 100m and I wouldn't care, the only fans that tend to give a shit and cite fees all the time are the jealous ones that know their club can't compete in this market.
Spurs fans care. That's Spurs who's last 3 signings were Sissoko, Janssen and N'Koudou for a total of £58m. They once got Delle Alli cheap though don't forget.
 

Vaibhav Raj

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2016
Messages
585
He's better than a lot of what is available right now, so can't really complain. That video of his first touches was pretty worrisome, but hopefully his other qualities will overshadow his shortcomings. And that video of him and Pogba shows that he's genuinely excited to be here, and I've always got time for players that actually *want* to be here.
To be fair, one can make a way longer compilation of such touches taken by the prime Wayne Rooney. But at the end of the day what actually counted was Rooney's bullish nature and knack of scoring goals. It was when Wayne stopped scoring and assisting that we all started observing and bashing his first touch and fitness.

Not saying that Lukaku looks like he will play on a level same as prime Wayne but I am not too fussed about that said compilation of his poor first touches as long as the compilation of the goals he has scored in past few years is way more impressive (second highest in league in last five years?)
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
For a £100 million pound deal he's not technically good enough for that sort of money and in theory is like a heskey that scores goals .

I wasn't thrilled when I heard we had signed him but if you look at last seasons problems , it was killing the average teams off and we were drawing to many games against the so called lesser teams .
Lukaku has been labelled as "just scoring against the lesser teams " a tag that I have labelled him myself on here in previous posts.
Maybe , thinking about it he's exactly what we need right now to eradicate last years failings .

His record virtually gaurentees 25 goals a season and his goal scoring record for Everton against the big 6 last season maybe tells a story of tactics more than anything .
Everton surely would sit deeper against the big teams and lukaku would be be more detached , starving him of chances.

I hope he does well and I'm still convinced greizmann will follow once athleticos ban as been lifted .
No on both counts.
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,483
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
I see it this way - there are very few world class no.9 out there and none of them is avaiable.
Belotti, Lukaku, Morata are all very good strikers but a tier below.

Belotti and Morats might be better than Lukaku but they are both a bigger gamble. Moving from Madrid's bench or Italian league to Manchester United and playing in the EPL is a huge ask. IMHO Lukako will hit the ground running
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,769
Why can't you just be happy for us for once Glaston? ;) You're like that one friend that always shits on your accomplishments, even though he has no right to​
 

Vashu

Predicted Sanchez's signing announcement
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
1,021
I'm reasonably happy with this transfer, however we still need to assemble the supporting cast for Lukaku with emphasis on wingers. Martial, Rashford, Mata and Miky in last season's form aren't good enough to make us title challengers.
 

Mihai

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
4,628
Looking forward to seeing the damage the Lukaku-Pogba partnership can do. People keep trotting out the line that Lukaku will be useless because teams don't give us any space in behind to work with. Have people forgotten about the number of times Pogba has gotten Ibrahimovic, Rooney, Mata, Mkhitaryan, Martial and Rashford in behind, only for them to mess up?

On the other hand you only need to look at his goals against City, Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs, stretching from right at the beginning of his Everton career to the very end, to see Lukaku can do it solo against the best in the league. If you look at the proportion of all of his goals for Everton that are simple runs in behind it's somewhere below 20% - similar to Ibrahimovic, Martial or Rashford.

If anything I'd say the likelihood of him scoring those goals is only going to increase now that he has someone like Pogba to supply him. The majority of his goals have come from crosses or simple passes around the box, both of which we do frequently. It's just that last season we had a number of players that kept missing those typical chances.
:drool: can't wait
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
What ! 75 plus 15 add ons plus Rooney ?? Mmm I make that around 100 million ??
the heskey quote was a bit tongue in cheek I will give you that
75 + 15 = 90. An iffy 90m at that given that 15m might not get paid. Even Glaston didn't stretch that to a £100m deal ffs. Might as well call it a £65m deal.

Rooney isn't part of the Lukaku deal.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,701
What ! 75 plus 15 add ons plus Rooney ?? Mmm I make that around 100 million ??
the heskey quote was a bit tongue in cheek I will give you that
If you want to play it that way remove the £30mil we were going to pay Rooney in wages and say he cost £70mil. You can't just make up a fee for a player we have let go on a free.

It's already been stated by everyone and his mum that the two deals are separate.
 

ZAGREB RED

Guest
Be interesting if Chelsea pivot and make a mega bid for Kane.
I think Spurs would quote any potential buyers well in excess of £100M, using the Lukaku fee as a yardstick, plus I think they would do all in their power to stop him leaving for another PL club.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,745
I'm a big fan of this signing. Looking forward to seeing him on the tour!
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,656
For you @GlastonSpur
Despite the cheeky nature, the point is completely correct. You can't look at the numbers involved as they're simply arbitrary at this point. What you need to look at is the transfer fee as a percentage of our turnover. Looking at it that way us spending 60 - 90m on a player is the same percentage as, for example Palace spending 32m on Benteke. The value is irrelevant, it's the percentage that counts to these businesses.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
Dear Liverpool/Spurs fans

When you try to mock us for spending vast sums of money, you aren't hurting us, and you're not winning the moral high ground trophy that only exists in your heads.
We're rich as feck and we love it. We'll spend another £100m on a player next summer and it'll be brilliant.

Thanks.

Fans of Manchester United

P.S We're filthy rich, it's great.
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
If he guarantees 25 goals per-season for the next six or seven years then he's definitely worth £100m in today's money.

Jose's job is now to complete the rest of the team and getting it operating as a unit, to the best of its ability.

This is only the beginning!
 

KN5

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
1,153
Location
Manchester
Maybe the impact of Lukakus pace is overstated but I don't think the lack of Zlatans is. Even the worst teams come out of their box for some portion of the game, especially as with Mourinho we're happy to sit back. With Zlatan any time we recover the ball we always, always give the opposition time to recover their shape before we get a shot off.
Yep this. The chances we had to put the ball in behind is an option we didn't have with Zlatan, we will now have that with Lukaku and Rashford off the bench.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.