ICC Cricket World Cup 2019

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,447
Yes because they get to control the weather :rolleyes::confused:. Stop making yourself look like a pratt.
No Mr. Smartarse, they can't control the weather. That's why don't give them hosting rights to every major tournament on such regular basis. England have been host to 2013, 2017 CT and 2019 World Cup. That's 3 ICC events in space of 6 years, each and everyone of them have been marred by rain yet not one progress can be seen from 2013.

Explain to me:

1. Why are there no reserve days for the group stage matches when 1999 WC (also hosted in England) had same provision?
2. England won the bid for hosting this WC in 2006, that is 13 years of time to build stadiums with better drainage facilities and a bigger ground staff to put covers on wet outfield compared to only covering the pitch. Why is the ground staff still severely under-equipped?
3. They could've built new stadiums during this time period with roof, or build a roof over existing ones. Why is this the case? Australia built one with roof in early 2000s.

Either choose a window of summer where it doesn't rain, and even then if there is a probability majority of matches will be troubled. Then how about, not given the hosting right to that country?

I have zero time for sanctimonious bullshit served by English fans on this topic on social media, its funny until your team is at the receiving end of it and you get fecked over.

Last year don't think it rained once in June, the whole summer it barely rained over 3-4 months all over Europe where there were heatwaves. It's just unlucky, but still this is Europe where summers can be rainy - they should prepare for weather. Surely someone thought, hang on, what if it rains 7 days in a row?

Look at Mumbai - over the next 14 days most of it is rain. I don't even watch cricket much but can't believe a major tournament in a major sport is being derailed because no one thought to plan for the weather.
Last year was the driest summer England has seen for sometime as you yourself have adduced to. But its England, even their 'summers' is like a preliminary monsoon season. When you are playing a sport which can be stopped even with the slightest intervention of weather then why persist with awarding hosting rights to a country which clearly sucks at hosting cricketing events of such magnitude?
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,198
Location
Canada
It would be a little funny if India Pak got washed out.
I don't think it will be a complete washout. We might see one innings at least but after that who knows. Anyways it will impact ICC big time if this match does not have a result.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,949
No Mr. Smartarse, they can't control the weather. That's why don't give them hosting rights to every major tournament on such regular basis. England have been host to 2013, 2017 CT and 2019 World Cup. That's 3 ICC events in space of 6 years, each and everyone of them have been marred by rain yet not one progress can be seen from 2013.

Explain to me:

1. Why are there no reserve days for the group stage matches when 1999 WC (also hosted in England) had same provision?
2. England won the bid for hosting this WC in 2006, that is 13 years of time to build stadiums with better drainage facilities and a bigger ground staff to put covers on wet outfield compared to only covering the pitch. Why is the ground staff still severely under-equipped?
3. They could've built new stadiums during this time period with roof, or build a roof over existing ones. Why is this the case? Australia built one with roof in early 2000s.

Either choose a window of summer where it doesn't rain, and even then if there is a probability majority of matches will be troubled. Then how about, not given the hosting right to that country?

I have zero time for sanctimonious bullshit served by English fans on this topic on social media, its funny until your team is at the receiving end of it and you get fecked over.



Last year was the driest summer England has seen for sometime as you yourself have adduced to. But its England, even their 'summers' is like a preliminary monsoon season. When you are playing a sport which can be stopped even with the slightest intervention of weather then why persist with awarding hosting rights to a country which clearly sucks at hosting cricketing events of such magnitude?
You're blaming England solely but surely the blame should lie with the tournament organisers for having no reserve days and not taking into account the weather? The fact that there's no roofed stadiums does blow my mind though, I can't imagine a football world cup missing 4 matches to weather and not rearranging the games, it would be an absolute disgrace.

I don't think a country should get barred from hosting major events though, especially given that England is one of the few western countries that actually plays the sport. But clearly whoever's in charge of the tournament need to sort it out because the rain is mitigable circumstance and it's crazy that nothing's been done to avoid this.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,447
You're blaming England solely but surely the blame should lie with the tournament organisers for having no reserve days and not taking into account the weather? The fact that there's no roofed stadiums does blow my mind though, I can't imagine a football world cup missing 4 matches to weather and not rearranging the games, it would be an absolute disgrace.

I don't think a country should get barred from hosting major events though, especially given that England is one of the few western countries that actually plays the sport. But clearly whoever's in charge of the tournament need to sort it out because the rain is mitigable circumstance and it's crazy that nothing's been done to avoid this.
It is fault of both ECB and ICC, I'm not laying the blame solely at the door of ECB. No reserve day makes zero sense given how unpredictable the weather is but guess what ICC/ECB don't give a feck. Each and everything is insured for, even the broadcasters insure ad spots in between the overs in a cricket match. Only people getting fecked are us fans, I know many who traveled across continents to catch their team play live but weather spoiled it.

England should get to host another cricketing event when they are prepared to not turn it into a total shitshow, that means having state of the art drainage facilities, a properly equipped groundstaff to cover the entirety of field, and obviously few stadiums with a roof.
 

Snowjoe

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,328
Location
Lake Athabasca
Supports
Cheltenham Town
You're blaming England solely but surely the blame should lie with the tournament organisers for having no reserve days and not taking into account the weather? The fact that there's no roofed stadiums does blow my mind though, I can't imagine a football world cup missing 4 matches to weather and not rearranging the games, it would be an absolute disgrace.
I think ultimately cricket isn’t a big enough sport here to warrant building covered stadiums that would go unused or filled to a tiny percentage of their capacity for years. Wembley and Cardiff both are covered but I don’t think the width would allow for big enough boundaries.
 

Interval

Level
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
11,334
Location
Mostly harmless
I like the weather being unpredictable. Making this a lot more fun. What I would do to be that guy sitting in the pavilion watching over a drizzle hit a field sipping tea in 10 degree weather :drool:
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,603
England should get to host another cricketing event when they are prepared to not turn it into a total shitshow, that means having state of the art drainage facilities, a properly equipped groundstaff to cover the entirety of field, and obviously few stadiums with a roof.
Well that isn't going to happen for the reasons @Snowle Gunnar Solskjær mentioned and so if reserve days aren't enough then international tournament cricket in England can't happen for some. Which is a shame given the diverse fans that there are in the country.
 

Snowjoe

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,328
Location
Lake Athabasca
Supports
Cheltenham Town
Each and everything is insured for, even the broadcasters insure ad spots in between the overs in a cricket match.
I actually see a lot of the insurance contracts through work and don’t think that just because it’s insured they’re happy for it to be rained off. By the time they’ve payed the excess and the substantial premium they’re much better off having had the games played.

I agree it should have been organised better though.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,331
It was building up to be a cracking tournament, now the momentum has been completely lost. It feels deflated.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,198
Location
Canada
Don’t stress anyway lads we might get some play next weekend

You are right. Tomorrow's game should be fine. Australia v. SL in oval should also be ok. Innd v. Pak is tricky but it won't be a complete washout and if we are lucky we might get a result too considering the rain is predicted only from late afternoon.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,754
Honestly would like to see Lanka reaching the SF just on the basis of rains for banter.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,610
Location
Oslo, Norway
Honestly would like to see Lanka reaching the SF just on the basis of rains for banter.
Happened with Bangladesh at the Champions Trophy. Any sensible organisation would have used that tournament as a test event, learnt from things that didn't go well and ensured the same mistakes didn't happen two years later in the same month and same conditions. But not ICC.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
If you can't have reserve days in this format. Then don't use this format in a country where rains are likely. 4 abandoned games is unprecedented in WC. Worse the count will definitely increase. Both India Pak and SA Afg also look dicey right now.
Well yeah, but complain about that then; some of those moaning about the weather now were vehemently defending the format earlier in the thread!
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,754
I like the weather being unpredictable. Making this a lot more fun. What I would do to be that guy sitting in the pavilion watching over a drizzle hit a field sipping tea in 10 degree weather :drool:
Alright grandpa
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,603
Happened with Bangladesh at the Champions Trophy. Any sensible organisation would have used that tournament as a test event, learnt from things that didn't go well and ensured the same mistakes didn't happen two years later in the same month and same conditions. But not ICC.
Well as @NinjaFletch said, that is at least one benefit of the tournament being so long. With each team playing 9 matches as opposed to just 3 in the Champions Trophy, we should avoid a situation where a team gets to the semis that really shouldn't.
 

Snowjoe

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,328
Location
Lake Athabasca
Supports
Cheltenham Town
Think it’s 15 or under you get fully refunded and 15-30 gets a 50% refund
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
That's good at least then.
Money's the insignificant part tbh. I'd be super pissed off if I took a day off work & end up going to a washed out game.

The sport needs to find a way to accommodate to its spectators better.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Money's the insignificant part tbh. I'd be super pissed off if I took a day off work & end up going to a washed out game.

The sport needs to find a way to accommodate to its spectators better.
Of course, it's still pretty shit but there's some consolation.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,198
Location
Canada
I still don't get how can a country or ECB be blamed for this. All this mess is caused by ICC.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,099
People talking about building a roof on stadiums like it's a joke or something
It's an obvious solution but imagine the cost. You might be able to do it for one ground but for the WC you'd have to have it on every stadium. Plus on the smaller grounds the roof would be barely off the ground and the batsmen would just keep aiming for it, turning the whole thing into a farce.

One thing they could do, if they don't want to use reserve days, is work on a solution that can be played out in the indoor nets at the ground. They used to do bowl-outs in the nets when matches were rained off in English domestic cricket - perhaps they could do something similar?
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,198
Location
Canada
Kiwis really got lucky today.
West Indies are the biggest losers with this result. Now if they are to be in top 4 they must beat one of England/NZ/Ind to have any chance of reaching top 4.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,189
Location
Interweb
No point in talking about the same thing over and over again. It is what it is. If 3-4 more games are washed then this WC would definitely be a lame duck one ala 2007.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,799
Location
London
It's an obvious solution but imagine the cost. You might be able to do it for one ground but for the WC you'd have to have it on every stadium. Plus on the smaller grounds the roof would be barely off the ground and the batsmen would just keep aiming for it, turning the whole thing into a farce.

One thing they could do, if they don't want to use reserve days, is work on a solution that can be played out in the indoor nets at the ground. They used to do bowl-outs in the nets when matches were rained off in English domestic cricket - perhaps they could do something similar?
Adding a roof would completely change the game.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Kiwis really got lucky today.
Disagree. No one got luck and I feel both teams would fancied a crack at the other.

I actually hope India and Pakistan get rained out. ICC wont take action and improve their competency unless this happens. It's the kick they need.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,391
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
No Mr. Smartarse, they can't control the weather. That's why don't give them hosting rights to every major tournament on such regular basis. England have been host to 2013, 2017 CT and 2019 World Cup. That's 3 ICC events in space of 6 years, each and everyone of them have been marred by rain yet not one progress can be seen from 2013.

Explain to me:

1. Why are there no reserve days for the group stage matches when 1999 WC (also hosted in England) had same provision?
2. England won the bid for hosting this WC in 2006, that is 13 years of time to build stadiums with better drainage facilities and a bigger ground staff to put covers on wet outfield compared to only covering the pitch. Why is the ground staff still severely under-equipped?
3. They could've built new stadiums during this time period with roof, or build a roof over existing ones. Why is this the case? Australia built one with roof in early 2000s.

Either choose a window of summer where it doesn't rain, and even then if there is a probability majority of matches will be troubled. Then how about, not given the hosting right to that country?

I have zero time for sanctimonious bullshit served by English fans on this topic on social media, its funny until your team is at the receiving end of it and you get fecked over.

Last year was the driest summer England has seen for sometime as you yourself have adduced to. But its England, even their 'summers' is like a preliminary monsoon season. When you are playing a sport which can be stopped even with the slightest intervention of weather then why persist with awarding hosting rights to a country which clearly sucks at hosting cricketing events of such magnitude?
Your initial post was childish saying England should not host anything for decades. Why does England suck at hosting of events of such magnitude. This is unusual circumstances with so much rain in June. The most cancelled matches at previous world cups has been 2. These were in 1992 and 2003, not a tournament which England hosted. England are free to bid to host as much as other countries are, its the ICC who decides.

1. I agree, there should be reserve days, no idea why they have not been included, would have saved some matches.
2. Covering the whole ground has been tried before in England and only works if it stops raining and you can resume quickly again. However it was stopped in England previously as it created sweat patches on the pitch. What evidence is there that the ground staff are under equipped? can you point to anything specifically rather than they just don't put covers on the whole ground?
3. Who is going to pay for roofs on stadiums. For Australian grounds, they are multi sport venues, not just cricket which is why they can afford the roofs. English county teams cannot afford it. They cost in the region of £70m to £100m.

How can you choose a window where it doesnt rain. Do you have a sixth sense to predict the weather in advance?

Not sure what bullshit you are referring to but clearly you have issues with it and acting like its a big conspiracy. Its a shit situation and fans from many countries are frustrated.
 
Last edited: