ICC Cricket World Cup 2019

Ronaldo's ego

Incorrectly predicted the 2020 US Election
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
7,751
Location
I'm better than Messi (even though I'm not)
I don't disagree. ANother batsmen like Iyer who has been left to rot in cold. The amount of chances Rayudu or Jadhav or Karthik got, should have been given to these players. We can all criticise Dhoni and Ganguly but one thing they were really good was in spotting and grooming young players. Kohli so far has failed to do that. Even for RCB he has failed to show trust on youngsters like Sarfaraz, Washington Sundar etc.
It’s literally been hours since being knocked out but the the very best teams plan well ahead. This cycle is done for India and planning for the next WC, which just happens to be in India starts now. Shaw, Gill, Iyer, Samson and obviously Pant and all good enough to be starting the first match of that tournament
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Being a DC fan and having closely observed his leadership quality, I feel he is not a bad shout but the issue is our selectors hardly groomed him. He should have been our number 4 for this WC, not Rayudu or Shankar or Jadhav. Instead he was left in cold for some reason. Every time I think even more I cannot imagine how bad our team management have done. I hope all the attention are not solely on Dhoni (he must retire) but also a serious look is given to our selectors and Kohli the captain.
Yep absolutely.

As you say already 2 years have been completely wasted where Iyer could have not only solved the no. 4 woes but also had big game experience and maybe some voice in the dressing room. This Virat Kohli + friends circus is incredibly pissing over some really promising talent and this kind of shit management has been carried by mercurial talents like Rohit, Kohli, Bumrah etc. We're lucky to have such match winners but the high dependency on them proves to be disastrous like we saw today.

Can't agree more with the last line. We all know Dhoni was finished before this tournament started and that he will cost us a big game, but instead of fixating on that focus on the bigger issues that will impact the next 10 years. M.S. will leave at max in a year or so, if not now, but what are we doing for the rest of the team by ignoring the likes of Pant in favour of clowns like Shankar and not having any viable candidate for captaincy.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Might be scant consolation right now, but India are stacked with talent for 2023. They should be brave and ask old guys like Dhawan, Sharma and Dhoni retire.

Build a new proper fully functional ODI batting like up like England around KL Rahul and Kohli and give the likes of Shaw, Gill, Pant, Iyer, Samson and others the next 3 years to rotate and fill in the gaps.

Bowling wise they are sorted, given 2023 will be in India itself. Already look favourites !
Building anything around KL Rahul will fall on it's face like he does as soon as anything meaningful is expected off him. The absolute definition of a fair weather player. Will be glad to see the back of him from the team. Get Shaw opening for us right away and add Iyer and Gill to the middle order.

Even in terms of pure talent based on which Rahul struts around, Gill has far greater talent and hopefully he won't be as mentally fragile. I'm only up for keeping Rohit, Kohli, Pant and Pandya in the current line up, get three spots filled up with fresh talent and groom them now. Rohit is old but still good enough and we can't have a completely young outfit and need some experience as well for which he'll do.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
Building anything around KL Rahul will fall on it's face like he does as soon as anything meaningful is expected off him. The absolute definition of a fair weather player. Will be glad to see the back of him from the team. Get Shaw opening for us right away and add Iyer and Gill to the middle order.

Even in terms of pure talent based on which Rahul struts around, Gill has far greater talent and hopefully he won't be as mentally fragile. I'm only up for keeping Rohit, Kohli, Pant and Pandya in the current line up, get three spots filled up with fresh talent and groom them now. Rohit is old but still good enough and we can't have a completely young outfit and need some experience as well for which he'll do.
Knowing how we have operated. Selectors will bring back Dhawan and Shankar because according to them Life was unfair on those two. We will thrash WI and SA and Ban(home series) and Dhawan will score some meaningless tons and come January we would have solved absolutely nothing and will be stuck with the same middle order crisis. I think if our selectors even have 10% brain they should start targeting for 2020 T20 WC. I know it is not 50 overs but we better take that seriously and win it. It will be sad if the likes of Rohit just bow out without winning anything major. Kohli needs to be a bit smart and start taking backseat for next few months and see how the team develops. Stop rewarding mediocre players or players whose ship have sailed any further chances.

But like I said nothing changes till Shastri and co. are removed.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Building anything around KL Rahul will fall on it's face like he does as soon as anything meaningful is expected off him. The absolute definition of a fair weather player. Will be glad to see the back of him from the team. Get Shaw opening for us right away and add Iyer and Gill to the middle order.

Even in terms of pure talent based on which Rahul struts around, Gill has far greater talent and hopefully he won't be as mentally fragile. I'm only up for keeping Rohit, Kohli, Pant and Pandya in the current line up, get three spots filled up with fresh talent and groom them now. Rohit is old but still good enough and we can't have a completely young outfit and need some experience as well for which he'll do.
Surprised you say that about Rahul. I know this tournament has shown they are essentially 2 different games, but Rahul has been brilliant in IPL and done OK in test match cricket too. There are some issues, but those can surely be developed and eradicated. Surely thats worth pursuing first; make him a more senior player and ask him to accept that burden, before jettison all that time invested in him?

Gill, Samson, Shaw and Pant and others are certainly a generation to look forward to, but they will take quite a few years before they have the experience, adaptability and temperament to continually succeed at the highest level of Indian cricket?
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
Think india would have won that without guptils top class run out
I doubt. Dhoni was playing with fire. One mistake and we would have lost anyways. It's not easy to just hit 25 of 11 in such long boundaries with 3 wickets remaining. Dhoni should have taken more risk in middle overs. Heck he was leaving deliveries when we needed 52 of 31. It was a poorly planned innings which was bound to fail the moment Jadeja got out.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,018
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Why did Shami get dropped?
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,780
Location
Mumbai
Haven't posted in ages and ages. But after such an occasion, time I did, at least for one post.

Before I say what I want to say, I'll say that I like India cricket team, am a big fan of Dhoni and Bumrah as cricketers, and wanted them in final, as England vs India is the dream final and my sister who lives 5 mins walk from Lords had planned an amazing finals day party planned. Not to be. Plus only very boring fans left in the cup so the finals day party will be very boring.

But as we've seen a glimpse of from this thread for a lot of this tournament, (I've been reading every once in a while), many India fans are quite intolerable. India fans have a superiority complex re nation and cricket, esp with other sub continant countries and England, and love to dine out on that. They call that banter. But when the time comes for them to have to take it back, they lose their shit with disgraceful responses. What should be banter becomes deeply personal, hurtful and vicious. Internet is full of it, and I've seen loads of Indians totally losing any semblance of self respect today.

Anyways, what I wanted to say at India fans was simply this: World class @ choking :lol::lol::lol:
This is like celebrating another dude giving your gf a good drilling when you couldnt but hey, great to see what you came back posting for ;)
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Surely thats worth pursuing first; make him a more senior player and ask him to accept that burden, before jettison all that time invested in him?
Based on what? He's been hopeless whenever seen in an Indian shirt for LOIs. Like I said if we are going to give someone a chance for pure ability, it should be Gill as based on pure talent he's the best thing we've had since Kohli.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
Dhoni should have taken more risk in middle overs. Heck he was leaving deliveries when we needed 52 of 31. It was a poorly planned innings which was bound to fail the moment Jadeja got out.
In one way looking from the outside you could say that, but it was the last batting partnership, if he got out early doing the same was over by then, he should have hit a couple of boundaries or a six earlier, target was within sights for India. It's easy to say, but difficult to execute with no one left to bat and make runs in the end.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,397
May as well add a knockout phase to PL. Man City face Chelsea and lose the PL based on one game having dominated the entire league.
Another fecking terrible argument. It's not a league, it's the fecking World Cup. The clue is in the second word. Every World Cup (football, rugby, cricket, netball, etc.) has a group stage followed by the KO stages. It's not exactly like this is new territory.

The reason why it's straight to semi final's is because there's only 10 teams. 40% of teams go through. Weren't you the same guy moaning that there's too much fodder in the group stage?
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
In one way looking from the outside you could say that, but it was the last batting partnership, if he got out early doing the same was over by then, he should have hit a couple of boundaries or a six earlier, target was within sights for India. It's easy to say, but difficult to execute with no one left to bat and make runs in the end.
I understand that but atleast rotate the strike more. Just blocking one end does no good. And dhoni doing this off late is really frustrating considering he was the best in rotation of strikes.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,206
Another fecking terrible argument. It's not a league, it's the fecking World Cup. The clue is in the second word. Every World cup has a group stage followed by the KO stages. It's my exactly like this is new ground.

The reason why it's straight to semi final's is because there's only 10 teams. 40% of teams go through. Weren't you the same guy moaning that there's too much fodder in the group stage.
He was.
 

zing

Zingle balls
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
13,816
I thought Williamson in the last 10 was clear headed and very good. He reacted very well to Jadeja's innings - high scoring shots were in front of square - he posted boundary riders in a wide V and didn't bother with actual or bluffed short ball tactics. Jadeja had to take them on and that's when the scoring dried up a bit.

Under pressure - that was very impressive. Bowling changes spot on the more you think about it with hindsight.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
I don't think Shami would have made much difference. Bar chahal every other bowler bowled well yesterday. It was the batting that collapsed. Anyways just realized wasn't Dinesh Karthik groomed for the finisher's role, especially after the nidhas trophy. Feck was he sent to build the innings when we were 5-3. The more I think the more I am getting pissed at Kohli and Shastri. Dhoni should have come at 5-3.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
I thought Williamson in the last 10 was clear headed and very good. He reacted very well to Jadeja's innings - high scoring shots were in front of square - he posted boundary riders in a wide V and didn't bother with actual or bluffed short ball tactics. Jadeja had to take them on and that's when the scoring dried up a bit.

Under pressure - that was very impressive. Bowling changes spot on the more you think about it with hindsight.
He is a very good captain as he also shows in IPL. I really hope he helps NZ win the WC. Classy guy and top batsmen.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,797
Location
London
Another fecking terrible argument. It's not a league, it's the fecking World Cup. The clue is in the second word. Every World Cup (football, rugby, cricket, netball, etc.) has a group stage followed by the KO stages. It's not exactly like this is new territory.

The reason why it's straight to semi final's is because there's only 10 teams. 40% of teams go through. Weren't you the same guy moaning that there's too much fodder in the group stage?
Except the tournament was played with a league format. Every team playing each other is not what WCs are meant to be.

Anyway I'm not arguing this anymore.
 

Ayush_reddevil

Éire Abú
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
10,777
He didn't take those with new ball, but when players were hitting him in slog overs. He was also giving runs away at the death.
That is partially true imo . He took 2 with the new ball against WI , 1 against Bangladesh and even against England he was the one who opened the floodgates by getting Bairstow & Morgan out . He also bowled really well with the new ball against England and had a couple of inside edges that went for 4. He got dropped for his death bowling but I feel that Bhuvi was the safer option while shami was the more wicket taking option and Kohli generally favours safe options
 

harshad

Play the odds, not the man - Poor man's Harvey
Scout
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
11,884
Location
On a long road that returns to Old Trafford!!!
I don't think Shami would have made much difference. Bar chahal every other bowler bowled well yesterday. It was the batting that collapsed. Anyways just realized wasn't Dinesh Karthik groomed for the finisher's role, especially after the nidhas trophy. Feck was he sent to build the innings when we were 5-3. The more I think the more I am getting pissed at Kohli and Shastri. Dhoni should have come at 5-3.
It's beyond understanding of us mere mortals.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,797
Location
London
I thought Williamson in the last 10 was clear headed and very good. He reacted very well to Jadeja's innings - high scoring shots were in front of square - he posted boundary riders in a wide V and didn't bother with actual or bluffed short ball tactics. Jadeja had to take them on and that's when the scoring dried up a bit.

Under pressure - that was very impressive. Bowling changes spot on the more you think about it with hindsight.
To be honest, its not so difficult when you're miles ahead of your opposition. All NZ needed was a wicket and it was game over.

Lets say Dhoni doesn't get run out, Neesham bowling the last over could have been a really bad move.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
I understand that but atleast rotate the strike more. Just blocking one end does no good. And dhoni doing this off late is really frustrating considering he was the best in rotation of strikes.
I think he would have taken more risk if there was one batsman like Pandya or someone else still left after him.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,797
Location
London
I don't think Shami would have made much difference. Bar chahal every other bowler bowled well yesterday. It was the batting that collapsed. Anyways just realized wasn't Dinesh Karthik groomed for the finisher's role, especially after the nidhas trophy. Feck was he sent to build the innings when we were 5-3. The more I think the more I am getting pissed at Kohli and Shastri. Dhoni should have come at 5-3.
Its not really that confusing. Dhonis been awful so they didn't want him in.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
I think he would have taken more risk if there was one batsman like Pandya or someone else still left after him.
But he didn't. We scored 15 odd runs between 20-30 overs. Again all I am saying is why has he stopped even rotating the strikes which was his real strength. No one is asking him to go bang bang from ball one but atleast rotate the strike more. He used to do that brilliantly.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,193
Location
Canada
Its not really that confusing. Dhonis been awful so they didn't want him in.
Then why even have him the squad. I don't think its that reason. They just tried to protect Dhoni as they knew if Dhoni goes the match is over. But that is poor planning by Kohli and Shastri. I believe Dhoni would have been fine and handled much better than Karthik.