The City, Solskjaer and Pochettino Conspiracy
Well, that's the definition of being in someone's shadow.They've won two of the last three leagues and we're all they can think about
Imagine how much the "proper club" comment would wind up City fansThat's actually hilarious. Tebas truly hates City and PSG and he doesn't even try to hide it
Strange how Chelsea always gets a free pass when it comes to sugar daddy.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They love us in Spain!Proper club
Hope it was the same here in south america. We are not hated but most people think city are a great clubThey love us in Spain!
Because Chelsea’s sugar daddy is an individual. Not a nation state. Simple.Strange how Chelsea always gets a free pass when it comes to sugar daddy.
Plus, Chelsea are very much financially independent now in the sense that they create their own income to spend, instead of relying on Roman.Because Chelsea’s sugar daddy is an individual. Not a nation state. Simple.
They did rely on a sugar daddy to get into this position, thoughPlus, Chelsea are very much financially independent now in the sense that they create their own income to spend, instead of relying on Roman.
If City carry on winning trophies and finishing in the top 4 every year, then in 10 years time they'll probably be financially independent too.Plus, Chelsea are very much financially independent now in the sense that they create their own income to spend, instead of relying on Roman.
They try to make out they are now, hilariously.If City carry on winning trophies and finishing in the top 4 every year, then in 10 years time they'll probably be financially independent too.
Of course but the last time they were spending heavily with only Abaramovich's money was a long time ago. The amount they get in sponsorships, TV money and loan fees has ensured they haven't done that for a long while.They did rely on a sugar daddy to get into this position, though
They will, they need to organically form some expensive sponsorships first though, which I'm guessing they're on their way to doing.If City carry on winning trophies and finishing in the top 4 every year, then in 10 years time they'll probably be financially independent too.
That is going to really wind them up. I'd love it if Madrid beat them in the CL and you just see Tebas in the stand with his cock out doing windmillsImagine how much the "proper club" comment would wind up City fans
That is going to really wind them up. I'd love it if Madrid beat them in the CL and you just see Tebas in the stand with his cock out doing windmills
They pretend like it doesn't but it really really does. They are a tinpot club that won the lottery and deep down they know it. Every achievement they have had over the last 8 years comes with an asterisk. You can't achieve any of that without the Sheikh. That's not true of any of the proper big clubs in England, Spain, Italy or Germany.Imagine how much the "proper club" comment would wind up City fans
It's just been so long ago now. The original sugar daddy club.Strange how Chelsea always gets a free pass when it comes to sugar daddy.
Only to try and get around FFP. If Chelsea had to deal with FFP at the time Roman was pumping his money into the club, I'm sure they'd have tried to figure a way around it too.They try to make out they are now, hilariously.
That is goldThe City, Solskjaer and Pochettino Conspiracy
Don't they still owe Roman a billion?Plus, Chelsea are very much financially independent now in the sense that they create their own income to spend, instead of relying on Roman.
Oh I know, but I'm saying they're in this great position originally from artificial funding from outside the clubOf course but the last time they were spending heavily with only Abaramovich's money was a long time ago. The amount they get in sponsorships, TV money and loan fees has ensured they haven't done that for a long while.
So if City and PSG generate own income after couple of years, they would be just fine ?Plus, Chelsea are very much financially independent now in the sense that they create their own income to spend, instead of relying on Roman.
Exactly this. Chelsea started it all and are equally as guilty as City and PSG.So if City and PSG generate own income after couple of years, they would be just fine ?
Chelsea were equally bad or worse when it comes to transfers and spoiling the market in terms of money. People just forget it because it happened almost 15 years back.
Well yeah, they'd be at that point spending within their means and not relying on their owners to fund the team. That's not me excusing what they've done in the past but them spending within their means would be better for football as figures wouldn't be so inflated.So if City and PSG generate own income after couple of years, they would be just fine ?
Chelsea were equally bad or worse when it comes to transfers and spoiling the market in terms of money. People just forget it because it happened almost 15 years back.
I think if City moved to a more organic model they'd get the same respect as Chelsea do.They did rely on a sugar daddy to get into this position, though
Do Chelsea get much respect?I think if City moved to a more organic model they'd get the same respect as Chelsea do.
They were villified by plenty, well except Liverpool fans who adopted them as a second club.They did rely on a sugar daddy to get into this position, though
That is going to really wind them up. I'd love it if Madrid beat them in the CL and you just see Tebas in the stand with his cock out doing windmills
Not exactly! The animosity between us and Chelsea grew massively after Roman arrived and whilst it's died down in recent years, the hate towards them was only behind the hate for Utd and Everton.They were villified by plenty, well except Liverpool fans who adopted them as a second club.
Opposition fans said the same when Ole first started. A spurs fan in my office genuinely seemed to believe this. InsaneCorrect me if I am wrong
But last night we were discussing the Cl/El with friends at discord and it came up that on Blue moon forums there have been going on a conspiracy theory that United only had their winning run after Lockdown, because Fergie is pulling the strings at background and Ole is just following his orders.
i don't remember that we have had that discussion here yet, but that seems next level insane. Are they really feeling that insecure?
I know.Reading some of these meltdown threads, to be fair, none of them hold a handle to a typical Caf matchday meltdown in full swing.
That my friends is a force of nature
Hahaha! TouchéI know.
I can barely candle it.
So, the "Thoughts???" bit.The City, Solskjaer and Pochettino Conspiracy