They weren't ignored, their performances were added as context to the stats. The raw data is proof of their contribution but not necessarily proof of good performances.
Antony unlike Bruno and Rashford has nothing to back him up. His stats are dreadful and the eye test isn't much better. Several posters have mentioned how he consistently fecks up counter attacks or fails to beat his man, use his right foot and put any sort of decent ball into the box.
Antony's redeeming qualities atm are that he's good in possession and works hard off the ball.
I've always been a stats + performances guy in how I rate players. Antony scores terribly in stats and no more than decent in performances. I'm not even sure how that can be argued against.
It can be argued against as there are some important attributes he brings that we lacked for years.
He stretches the play to create space everytime, all our RWs used to move centrally as starting position and clog the midfield. We played with no RW for years and our pass map used to be hilarious with no RW at all
He is always option to progress the play, works incredibly hard and helps his FB almost all the time.
Ofcourse that's not enough as he should be doing more in final third, especially at creating chances. Right now he does all the good job and then cuts inside to play pass to attacking mid position or the overlapping FB. It isn't bad thing but he overdoes it.
His performance are nowhere near as bad as you and others are making out. Right now he isn't backing himself to play killer pass, when he does it there won't be much issues with his play.