You've changed your story from "typical caftards saying x, y and z" to "ok so they're not saying it, but it's being implied" to "ok so it hasn't been implied but I'm anticipating it". That's quite something.
not at all. People were doing that before my post. Just because I did not put verbatim does not change the fact it was being implied. Also, it's called paraphrasing and captured the spirit of what people were syaing. He was being judged already as a failure.
Funny thing is my argument was that it
WAS being implied and you have just literally made up an argument in your head that I have said "ok so it
hasn't been implied".
Let me make it simple for you. It IS being implied and that is my argument. Looks like you're changing your story and have hypocritically set up a straw man. Rather Ironic.
Not sure why you are getting so worked up over it. Guess I have the power of foresight as everything I said is coming to fruition. Aside from implying that people were already questioning him based on a few minutes in his first game, it was also said in the spirit of how I anticipated the reactions which you now have had to concede are happening. Joking aside it's not rocket science it was obvious it was going to happen.
Are you ok now or do you need more clarification? Word of advice don't go on a crusade over a lazy and unclear comment. Lifes to short.