milemuncher777
formerly kid777
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 5,156
You're all going to be disappointed. We're just being used so City pay up quickly.
You're forgetting the key one - NOODLES.
An endless supply of noodles for both Sanchez, and his dog.
"You must be hungry from all this negotiating, Mr Sanchez..."
He's amazingly brilliant and has immense mental strength™ - please buy him.
PS I'll lend you the money.
He's amazingly brilliant and has immense mental strength™ - please buy him.
PS I'll lend you the money.
Don't be such a spoilsport!You're all going to be disappointed. We're just being used so City pay up quickly.
Neither would have sulked like he has this last 18 months. His attitude is a legitimate concern, surely?
Mkhi probably has similar weaknesses to what most of your other 'pretty' attacking midfielders have in terms of inconsistency and seemingly not the strongest mentally when things aren't going right for him. So he's probably not what you really need. But I would say that in terms of talent he's better than what you have (not counting Ozil), so getting him in exchange for Sanchez (and maybe Ozil ) would still be better for you than no player.That's fair enough, to be honest I have not seen Mkhi much. I know he was cracking in Football Manager.
To be fair, he hasn't sulked for 18 months. During the mid part of last season it often seemed like Sanchez was the only one still trying his heart out long after the rest of the team had completely lost focus. It was only in the final months of last season where he seemed to get sick and tired of being let down by the rest of the team and manager. Once that happened then yeah his attitude went south bigtime, but I struggle to actually blame him.Neither would have sulked like he has this last 18 months. His attitude is a legitimate concern, surely?
“From what we know, there have been a few meetings already between Manchester United and Sanchez’s agents, one of them even in London in the past few days."
Erm, Gomes is 17 years old and playing for our reserves. You can’t avoid signing a player that is borderline world class because you want to develop a 17 year old kid who has a very small chance of reaching a similar level. That would just be stupid wouldn’t it. If we were to develop Gomes, I’d rather see us sacrificing the minutes we’re giving Mkhitaryan, Mata, Herrera or Fellaini.
Comparing Nadal to Rooney? He won two grandslams in 2017 and finished runner up in one. Ffs.Floats about gracefully and smoothly, and will keep on playing to a high level into his 30s. Unlike Nadal who has run himself into the ground a la Rooney.
There is no comparison between Rooney and Nadal, not unless he gets caught by the papparazi with his balls banging against Annette....Comparing Nadal to Rooney? He won two grandslams in 2017 and finished runner up in one. Ffs.
Pep would be offering him just 20mn utd could be including mkhitarayan in the deal and given ozil is also likely to leave even if wenger hates mourinho he would be foolish to accept city's while rejecting ours.Wenger and Pep have a common enemy in Jose...
If Wenger has a say in it, he wont be dealing with Jose.
Wenger and Pep have a common enemy in Jose...
If Wenger has a say in it, he wont be dealing with Jose.
He looked quality that season under Pep. He had a lot of injury issues and maybe that's what you are referring to. He was particularly excellent in one game v Real I recall at that time and I also recall seeing him in cl that season, can't remember the team, but he was man of the match in that game. Of course money and the lure of trophies are a big motivating factor, but I wouldn't underestimate the Pep factor in this
There's too many naysayers 'round here - why can't you be stupid and gullible like me?
There's too many naysayers 'round here - why can't you be stupid and gullible like me?
If City are offering only around 20m and we ready to offer around 35m hypothetical, then Wenger might have no say cause the board might step in at the point.Wouldn´t it have more to do with the fact that United are closer to Arsenal and that Sanchez could certainly improve United more than City at the moment? I think Arsenal would be more hesitant to sell to United/Chelsea/Liverpool/Tottenham than City.
Perhaps he was only interested in City because we never showed any interest to him. I hope he's biting his agents ear off hoping to seal the deal with us
I think its difficult for any player to perform once they've made a decision to leave.
Wouldn´t it have more to do with the fact that United are closer to Arsenal and that Sanchez could certainly improve United more than City at the moment? I think Arsenal would be more hesitant to sell to United/Chelsea/Liverpool/Tottenham than City.
No. Arsenal only care about one thing and that's profit.
This screams of Sanchez's team using us to tell Pep to get a move on.
Coutinho did fine?
Tbh I Sanchez has been ok (not great, not Sterling-poor).
If City are offering only around 20m and we ready to offer around 35m hypothetical, then Wenger might have no say cause the board might step in at the point.
Sloppy Steve. Sad.There's too many naysayers 'round here - why can't you be stupid and gullible like me?
If City are offering only around 20m and we ready to offer around 35m hypothetical, then Wenger might have no say cause the board might step in at the point.