City still not moving on the fee? Right now the whole deal to city in Jan seems to be based on them upping the fees. The "update" being, they still haven't done it.Update?
City still not moving on the fee? Right now the whole deal to city in Jan seems to be based on them upping the fees. The "update" being, they still haven't done it.Update?
A move to City, for those interested in what the article says.Goal have said that his family are in London in preparation of a move.
Absolute fecking bullshit. If City didn’t spend a fortune in the summer and be very well stocked in that area, they’d be going all out now to get this transfer done. £30m or £80m.Yeah, i posted the wrong tweet,
this was the update from 3 hours ago
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Sanchez is not better than Van Persie.Even if we get 3-4 years top quality service from him, it's worth it. Similar to RVP although I think Sanchez may even be slightly better
2-3 years of a player at his peak is underrated. I love watching players develop as much as the next man but developing a player also means you have to endure them blowing cold as often as their purple patches.Fact is that most footballers decline drastically in their thirties. Alexis may only have 2-3 peak years left.
Your entitled to your opinion as I am mine, he has low centre of gravity, highly athletic, highly skilful and a very determines character. He has all the skills to modify and adapt his game to suit his role. To condemn his future to being dependant on his so called "explosiveness" is poppycock imho.5-6 years easily? Physique is one of Sanchez’ most prominent assets and it’s a major reason why he’s so good. Players who rely on their physical abilities tend to decline earlier than those who do not. The truth is we don’t know when Sanchez is going to lose his explosiveness, but when he does, he’s going to decline quite rapidly. To claim that he’s going to last 5-6 years, easily, at the level he is performing at right now is just nonsense imo.
I think the point is they could have him for free in 6 months.Absolute fecking bullshit. If City didn’t spend a fortune in the summer and be very well stocked in that area, they’d be going all out now to get this transfer done. £30m or £80m.
So tell me, was Walker fair price? How about Danilo? They were fine but Sanchez is too pricy all of a sudden?
People have short memories. City were breaking the bank for players like Bellamy, Robinho, Elano and Santa Cruz not so long ago and now they start pulling out this sanctimonious bullshit. The state of the media is un-fecking-real.
That's the point of the argument. Alexis is a luxury signing for City - one that they can do without if they miss out on him, but, if they can get a world class player for a cut price they'd take advantage of.Absolute fecking bullshit. If City didn’t spend a fortune in the summer and be very well stocked in that area, they’d be going all out now to get this transfer done. £30m or £80m.
So tell me, was Walker fair price? How about Danilo? They were fine but Sanchez is too pricy all of a sudden?
People have short memories. City were breaking the bank for players like Bellamy, Robinho, Elano and Santa Cruz not so long ago and now they start pulling out this sanctimonious bullshit. The state of the media is un-fecking-real.
Absolutely. I'm just saying he's probably not a £100m player at this point.2-3 years of a player at his peak is underrated. I love watching players develop as much as the next man but developing a player also means you have to endure them blowing cold as often as their purple patches.
We’ve got lots of players in that age group at the moment. Having someone like Alexis who can carry the team and drag a result out of the games where the opposition is sitting back is invaluable at this stage.
Does that really matter though?Don't think he's a £100m player at his age.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Crikey, Ashley Cole has let himself go.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Exactly, you can understand the sell on argument if a mid-table club were gambling and paying more than they could really afford for a youngster with potential when the bigger clubs are reluctant to pay the fee.They seem to forget the biggest clubs do not need to sell players on.
So could literally any other team in the world.I think the point is they could have him for free in 6 months.
Mata?have we ever had muppet mode acticated like this in January before?
Why doesn't he just hire Pickfords?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Can't tell if you're joking but I'll simply say for the the moment that he's only a year younger and has never in his career even been close to the quality of Sanchez.Forget Sanchez. We should go all in for Pulisic. I can't think of a more better player than him for us on the right wing. He'll definitely be as good as sanchez in another year.
You think city would play the fair price card if they could afford to match united's offer?Sanchez has been the best player in the league along with Kane since he arrived and is one of the only premier league players that would get into any team in the world
It would be madness for either team not to pay what they want even for City so they could stop him going to a direct competitor
Pulisic, not Perisic.Can't tell if you're joking but I'll simply say for the the moment that he's only a year younger and has never in his career even been close to the quality of Sanchez.
Pulisic at Dortmund, not Perisic at Inter. Pulisic is 19.Can't tell if you're joking but I'll simply say for the the moment that he's only a year younger and has never in his career even been close to the quality of Sanchez.
What if the girl only wants to date you and happy meals doesn't bother her?So could literally any other team in the world.
Being self-indulgent enough to believe a player is going to sit around and work his contract down so you don’t have to spend money on him is like taking a date to McDonalds and buying her a Happy Meal.
This is incredibly good
The LVG impression is insanely good.
Lol Nadal has spentUtter nonsense.
@wr8_utd go to school on this guy.
Nadal won two slams in his 30s last time I checked and was world num 1. Ran himself to the ground indeed, I wish I ran myself in a ground like that.
Yes very true he has had a renaissamce last year but during Djokos dominant run he was in prerty terrible form due to injuries.Comparing Nadal to Rooney? He won two grandslams in 2017 and finished runner up in one. Ffs.
Hazard? De Bruyne?Sanchez has been the best player in the league along with Kane since he arrived and is one of the only premier league players that would get into any team in the world
It would be madness for either team not to pay what they want even for City so they could stop him going to a direct competitor
Afaik English clubs cannot sign pre contracts with players from other English teams. We'd have to wait until his contract expired.Why pay Arsenal anything? Just from a business perspective. He will be free in 6 months. All we or City need is a pre-contract agreement. Only thing he can help with earlier for is the Champ League.
Crikey, Ashley Cole has let himself go.
During Djokovics dominant spell, Federer won one grand slam. Whilst Nadal won about 4.Lol Nadal has spent
Yes very true he has had a renaissamce last year but during Djokos dominant run he was in prerty terrible form due to injuries.