Badunk
Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Klopp will get his players to do anything for three points.
And not the good sort!He really does look like a lesbian.
You missed out '5 times' from your post.I'm a bit impressed how Scouse manage to win game after game despite not having their best players available. Their spirit really is amazing. Jurgen is the star!
Chelsea winning the league would put Mourinho in a very bad spotlight, Scouse winning it for the first time not good, can't stand the bald man Guardiola and it's City after all, has to be Arsenal, but it's Arsenal...
we're doomed...
definitely not!And not the good sort!
I am sure they do - it's the players that don'tStunned and disappointed as a Liverpool fan. At what point will clubs take drink driving seriously.
What's the club got to do with it. If you break the law is your place of employment culpable?Stunned and disappointed as a Liverpool fan. At what point will clubs take drink driving seriously.
Classic Laura from Lancashire.
How do lesbians look?He really does look like a lesbian.
Klopp will get his players to do anything for three points.
Very true, he's the twunt who was drunk whilst driving not Liverpool FC as a collective and it's not like Klopp would have said to his players "and remember folks; don't forget to get royally pished and then illegally drive home". Or maybe he secretly does train them to do it and it's called Gin Gin Pressing.What's the club got to do with it. If you break the law is your place of employment culpable?
Outrage!! Obviously they all look the same that's what I was clearly saying.How do lesbians look?
HahahahaOutrage!! Obviously they all look the same that's what I was clearly saying.
"How many drink drivers did we catch tonight, constable?"
"We Gok Wan, Sir."
I'll get my coat
Like Firmino.How do lesbians look?
And Nasri.Like Firmino.
What Firmino did had the potential to cause injury or death to someone. He has brought the clubs reputation into disrepute. I would not say LFC is to blame for Firmino's actions. But because of the unique place a club holds in the community, the esteem players are held up to, the responsibility of the club to its stakeholders, one of whom are its supporters then yes the club is involved indirectly.What's the club got to do with it. If you break the law is your place of employment culpable?
Spot on. He's an absolute disgrace. Supposed to be a role model.What Firmino did had the potential to cause injury or death to someone. He has brought the clubs reputation into disrepute. I would not say LFC is to blame for Firmino's actions. But because of the unique place a club holds in the community, the esteem players are held up to, the responsibility of the club to its stakeholders, one of whom are its supporters then yes the club is involved indirectly.
It is the club that pays Firmino's huge wages. It is the club whose name, along with Firmino, has been dragged through the mud because of his idiocy. All the club asks of Firmino in return for his salary is that he behaves in a dignified manner at all times. Drunk driving can never fall under the heading of dignified. Until clubs show a willingness to sack employees, in particular playing staff/managerial staff, or any one employed by the club whose name is high profilie, who drink and drive then I question whether they fully appreciate the seriousness of drink driving.
You should possibly stick allegedly in there a few times seeing as he's not been found guilty of anything just yet, nor are there accusations of him being drunk. Possibly hold fire on your indignation.What Firmino did had the potential to cause injury or death to someone. He has brought the clubs reputation into disrepute. I would not say LFC is to blame for Firmino's actions. But because of the unique place a club holds in the community, the esteem players are held up to, the responsibility of the club to its stakeholders, one of whom are its supporters then yes the club is involved indirectly.
It is the club that pays Firmino's huge wages. It is the club whose name, along with Firmino, has been dragged through the mud because of his idiocy. All the club asks of Firmino in return for his salary is that he behaves in a dignified manner at all times. Drunk driving can never fall under the heading of dignified. Until clubs show a willingness to sack employees, in particular playing staff/managerial staff, or any one employed by the club whose name is high profilie, who drink and drive then I question whether they fully appreciate the seriousness of drink driving.
Such a little snake trying to get him in bother with the mods. He's been charged and it's in the public domain.You should possibly stick allegedly in there a few times seeing as he's not been found guilty of anything just yet, nor are there accusations of him being drunk. Possibly hold fire on your indignation.
Legalese aside, of course Liverpool FC have to live up to a certain standing but you're jumping the gun here - sack him for being charged? I presume you know nothing of the case. In fact, I suspect the moderators of this forum aren't wild about you implying guilt on a person while a case is still very much live.
Your either over the limit or your not. If he had been drinking coca cola all night he doesn't get arrested simple as. If he takes a taxi home without getting into his car then there is no story.You should possibly stick allegedly in there a few times seeing as he's not been found guilty of anything just yet, nor are there accusations of him being drunk. Possibly hold fire on your indignation.
Legalese aside, of course Liverpool FC have to live up to a certain standing but you're jumping the gun here - sack him for being charged? I presume you know nothing of the case. In fact, I suspect the moderators of this forum aren't wild about you implying guilt on a person while a case is still very much live.
As for the 'snake' comment. Not at all - I've been on these sorts of forums for years and have seen threads locked / deleted for such talk. Public domain? So what? All police activity is in the public domain - there are still very strict laws about what can and cannot be discussed prior to the case being completed. Not a single newspaper in the land will declare guilt at this point.Such a little snake trying to get him in bother with the mods. He's been charged and it's in the public domain.
I'm not questioning his potential guilt - that's the court to decide. I'm merely stating that prior to judicial proceedings being completed it's injudicious to call out somebody's guilt.Your either over the limit or your not. If he had been drinking coca cola all night he doesn't get arrested simple as. If he takes a taxi home without getting into his car then there is no story.
He must have had alcohol in his system to be charged though surely? He must have been driving? On that basis alone it was an idiotic thing to get behind the wheel.As for the 'snake' comment. Not at all - I've been on these sorts of forums for years and have seen threads locked / deleted for such talk. Public domain? So what? All police activity is in the public domain - there are still very strict laws about what can and cannot be discussed prior to the case being completed. Not a single newspaper in the land will declare guilt at this point.
I'm not questioning his potential guilt - that's the court to decide. I'm merely stating that prior to judicial proceedings being completed it's injudicious to call out somebody's guilt.
Heck, tons of people have been cleared following such charges. Might be wrong, might be expensive lawyers, might be uncollaborated breatherlizers undermining the charge (can happen)...either way it's wiser to hold back.
If he's found guilty, full your boots.
Pretty sure being arrested by the Police and being charged with drink driving is an accusation...You should possibly stick allegedly in there a few times seeing as he's not been found guilty of anything just yet, nor are there accusations of him being drunk. Possibly hold fire on your indignation.
Legalese aside, of course Liverpool FC have to live up to a certain standing but you're jumping the gun here - sack him for being charged? I presume you know nothing of the case. In fact, I suspect the moderators of this forum aren't wild about you implying guilt on a person while a case is still very much live.
Being over the limit is a technicality. Does it mean drunk?Pretty sure being arrested by the Police and being charged with drink driving is an accusation...
I won't slate him because he isn't guilty yet like you say. Despite that, like others have said it should be a very straightforward case. There's not really much by way of possible explanations or alternatives.
Too drunk to drive, yes. That's what 'limit' means.Being over the limit is a technicality. Does it mean drunk?
I know. Hence my suggested caution. Hardly bad advice.@PickledRed you're being over dramatic.
He's been charged and should be named. We have open justice in the UK and it is imperative that we do. With regards to commenting on an open case you are entitled to discuss someones guilt or innocence however publications which pose a substantial risk of impeding/causing prejudice to the course of justice are off limits.
I think if he's over the limit, then it's considered that he's consumed enough alcohol to impair his ability to drive safely. How drunk people are exactly varies from person to person, but I'd imagine they take various factors into account when setting the limit.Being over the limit is a technicality. Does it mean drunk?
Are you actually drunk when you drink the minimum that can take you over the limit? I don't think being 'drunk' necessarily equates to being over the limit.Too drunk to drive, yes. That's what 'limit' means.
AgreeI think if he's over the limit, then it's considered that he's consumed enough alcohol to impair his ability to drive safely. How drunk people are exactly varies from person to person, but I'd imagine they take various factors into account when setting the limit.