izec
Full Member
I was never awayHaters out in force, eh?
I was never awayHaters out in force, eh?
Makes a change from the increasingly silly opinion that he's some sort of superstar, I suppose.Haters out in force, eh?
Don't worry it's not a compliment towards Fellaini you can continue to bash him, my post was more so, that we've looked more of a threat when hoofing it to a half-fit Fellaini. Which says a lot about our current Plan A of playing football.Being on the receiving end of hoofball equals being creative these days?
Exactly. He's an attacker. Not a glamorous one, but sometimes an effective one. The closer we see him towards our goal (other than on a set piece) the more trouble we're inYeah, I can excuse the fact that he was not fully fit, but he is a box player. His best use is either defending set pieces or attacking set pieces.
Exactly. He was as creative as a lamppost. Creative isn't the adjective to describe a player like Fellaini. Creativity is quick-wittedness, not nodding the ball on.How was he creative in any way? Genuinely not sure what you class as such.
The last player that should be blamed for that shishow. Getting rushed back from injury in such a game he was bound to make mistakes. Mkhi, Herrera, Lukaku all useless. Martial did absolutely nothing as well. Yeah, I know hoofball, yadda yadda, but the game passes him by, at least Fellaini tries do something with his considerably lesser talent.With good reason, hopeless player.
YesExactly. He's an attacker. Not a glamorous one, but sometimes an effective one. The closer we see him towards our goal (other than on a set piece) the more trouble we're in
Because hoofing it to Fellaini and Fellaini knocking it for players was the biggest source of a threat we could muster up all game. Unless you were watching a different game?How was he creative in any way? Genuinely not sure what you class as such.
I've always liked Herrera but he has been pretty poor. Seems to be consistently regressing.Makes a change from the increasingly silly opinion that he's some sort of superstar, I suppose.
It's hilarious that people think playing him ahead of Herrera (who has proven over time to be a much better central midfielder) is going to change anything. Yet four good games to start this season and he's a walking miracle.
We played hoofball and he did his job. Half-fit. Wonder why he's getting the hate. Of course he was poor today, I think Jose never planned to start him unless things were desperate.Obviously not fit but still engineered our best chances in the second half. Better than Mkhi and Herrera today.
He is way ahead of Herrera. In fact I can't wait for Herrera to be dropped and Felli being played againMakes a change from the increasingly silly opinion that he's some sort of superstar, I suppose.
It's hilarious that people think playing him ahead of Herrera (who has proven over time to be a much better central midfielder) is going to change anything. Yet four good games to start this season and he's a walking miracle.
You do know that this argument was also tossed at other players who didn't play at the beginning of the season (yet still trained) and then jumped in the squad looking shite? It was called being rusty then.I like how his lack of first touch is supposedly a result of him not being match-fit. Abysmal defensively, a bit unlucky not to score. You really have to give him credit for appearing at the end of those crosses though — Lukaku fails to do it even though they're basically the same size.
Class is permanent though, and he doesn't have any.
Herrera and Mikhi have been useless for weeks now. Fellaini did more in the last 15 minutes that they did all game long.Obviously not fit but still engineered our best chances in the second half. Better than Mkhi and Herrera today.
Herrera is a much better central midfielder. The evidence to suggest that is overwhelming and undeniable unless you haven't watched any of the last three seasons.He is way ahead of Herrera. In fact I can't wait for Herrera to be dropped and Felli being played again
He is in horrible form and has been so all season. Does nothing but fall over and moan.Herrera is a much better central midfielder. The evidence to suggest that is overwhelming and undeniable unless you haven't watched any of the last three seasons.
We were lucky to get away with some of his errors near his own box, but yes he had a few decent moments in the last few minutes up frontThought he did well for the time he was on. Certainly made his presence felt and was very unlucky with his chance, which was a great piece of skill. We certainly did not lose because of him.
It is baffling that when he came on he was playing so deep and trying to play the ball out from the back, that is when he looked the worst. Once he started playing closer to the box, he was much better.Exactly. He's an attacker. Not a glamorous one, but sometimes an effective one. The closer we see him towards our goal (other than on a set piece) the more trouble we're in
HahahahaHerrera is a much better central midfielder. The evidence to suggest that is overwhelming and undeniable unless you haven't watched any of the last three seasons.
He is quality. What is not quality is criticizing a player who just came back from an injury, in Stamford Bridge, with the team being behind and playing already poorly.He's an average player who doesn't belong at a big club; yet he'll win a couple of tackles next game and everyone will pretend he's quality. And on the cycle goes.
It's funny cause yesterday I just pointed out something similar about the Fellaini situation in one of the thread on these boards.Makes a change from the increasingly silly opinion that he's some sort of superstar, I suppose.
It's hilarious that people think playing him ahead of Herrera (who has proven over time to be a much better central midfielder) is going to change anything. Yet four good games to start this season and he's a walking miracle.