Doesn't make sense to question one of the few who played well. Criticizing him after today is intentionally ignoring all the good he did (which was a lot) and blaming stuff that he had nothing to do with.
Multiple games now where a lot of the good we've done has flowed through him. Could use more of the others performing on his level. Extremely easily was our 2nd best after Hojlund today.
This is exactly why I’m questioning it though.
Him playing well in a silo has minimal impact on team performances & results. If we continue on the fashion of ‘
Multiple games now where a lot of the good we've done has flowed through him.’ yet continue to see the same results at what point can we conclude maybe his good isn’t quite good enough?
Mount isn’t a particularly bad player but he doesn’t do enough to raise the ceiling of a team, he’ll raise the floor because he’ll run around a lot & play it safe but good Mount performances end like tonight & that simply isn’t the level of midfielder we were sold this Summer by the football purists.
Him being
easily our 2nd best player after Hojlund on a night like tonight is damning praise.
If he continues to show the influence [or lack of] in overall team performances whilst ‘a lot of the good flows through him’ we are fecked. He can’t just be average/barely above & the fact people are already settling into this level as acceptable is worrying.
I’m certainly not ignoring ‘
all’ the good he did, I’m questioning whether that good can get better because it’s nowhere near what we require to turn things around.