Mason Mount image 7

Mason Mount England flag

2023-24 Performances


View full 2023-24 profile

4.8 Season Average Rating
Appearances
20
Goals
1
Assists
1
Yellow cards
2

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,100
Location
Moscow
I've been surprised at people claiming that he was having a good game in the match thread and this thread continues to surprise me. Not our worst culprit tonight, but painfully mediocre at everything (and also seems to have a top speed of Eriksen). Speaking of the latter, he showed what we've been missing creatively once he came on and I don't think that what Mount does defensively makes up for it (and no, sadly, Eriksen isn't the solution to our problems either).

That one pass to Højlund – I think that was Mount – was good though.
 

TrailMonkey

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 1, 2023
Messages
219
I like him. Works hard, shows for the ball, good touch, mobile etc. Not everything he tries come off, but he doesn't shirk responsibility.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
4,047
Just Ok. Not the right profile of midfielder we should have signed.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,442
Location
Lucilinburhuc
He has hardly been in the team because of injury. We controlled the game against CP with him in the team. Today during the first 45m he was the best midfielder and we mostly were in control. Mount done okay so far.
Jesus christ, that League cup game against Palace was a friendly for them. They hardly cared. The PL game was a different kettle of fish and it showed. We dominated feck all, since they let us have the ball and knew we are toothless.
 

MattofManchester

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Messages
3,854
Gotta play one of him or Bruno. Not both.

This experiment isn't working. For either player.

Thought he did well under those circumstances.
 

Dorris

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 3, 2014
Messages
510
I've been surprised at people claiming that he was having a good game in the match thread and this thread continues to surprise me. Not our worst culprit tonight, but painfully mediocre at everything (and also seems to have a top speed of Eriksen). Speaking of the latter, he showed what we've been missing creatively once he came on and I don't think that what Mount does defensively makes up for it (and no, sadly, Eriksen isn't the solution to our problems either).

That one pass to Højlund – I think that was Mount – was good though.
The fact you think he has a top speed of Eriksen shows you probably watch football with a blindfold on. One of our most mobile players.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,381
Location
Canada
Thought he was very good. 2nd best after hojlund. I like the signing. Maybe when we figure our shit out it'll stand out more.
 

Red Rash

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
2,247
Was ok I thought but it should be him or Bruno. They want to play in the same area and playing them together isn't working.
 

the hea

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
6,362
Location
North of the wall
Our second best player tonight, if the rest of the players performances was on par with him and Höjlund this would have been an easy win.
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
4,268
I like what I'm seeing from him but it's a case of us being horrible defensively which he isn't expected to solve anyways.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
I've been surprised at people claiming that he was having a good game in the match thread and this thread continues to surprise me. Not our worst culprit tonight, but painfully mediocre at everything (and also seems to have a top speed of Eriksen). Speaking of the latter, he showed what we've been missing creatively once he came on and I don't think that what Mount does defensively makes up for it (and no, sadly, Eriksen isn't the solution to our problems either).

That one pass to Højlund – I think that was Mount – was good though.
There's opinions and then there's eyesight issues. It's important to know the difference between the two.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,100
Location
Moscow
What's frustrating — and I feel that this is the thread for it even though it's certainly isn't Mount's fault — is that we keep Bruno as our main corner-taker after signing Mount whose corner kicks has been the highlight of his career so far. And Mount has already showed that he's a great corner-taker for us.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,663
He did OK? But when he's the number one target for the middle and we paid that much with him having a year left and would have been free next season, it just makes things more baffling.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,100
Location
Moscow
There's opinions and then there's eyesight issues. It's important to know the difference between the two.
It's a slight exaggeration, of course, but I'm really disappointed with his athleticism so far. The application is there but he just lacks both pace and physicality to be a real defensive presence.
 

zapp

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 8, 2023
Messages
28
Thought he played the best I've seen him in a United shirt. Unlucky not to have an assist and a goal tonight. Seems like it just isn't coming off for him unfortunately.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,725
Location
The Netherlands
Jesus christ, that League cup game against Palace was a friendly for them. They hardly cared. The PL game was a different kettle of fish and it showed. We dominated feck all, since they let us have the ball and knew we are toothless.
So you can only dominate when you have the ball and the opponent tries to get the ball? You cant dominate when you have the ball if the opponent allows you to have the ball? Both situations you still have the ball.

Attackers were the main problem in the league game against CP. Not the midfielders. I know it is fancy to dislike Mount because he came for a lot of money from Chelsea and people rather had seen a different purchase but Mount really wasnt the issue today. He did his job mostly just fine.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,812
He's alright but you need to be more than that to be a United starter.
If we thought he'd provide Fred's industry but with more flair we should slap ourselves.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
45,033
He was decent but I'm not sure where he fits. He's like a utility player right now, a John O'Shea to replace Fred.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,537
Put in a decent shift tonight. Sad to see him get trashed here, but given the circumstances it’s understandable.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,742
Really wasn't anything different from Lingard at his best. Though, at Lingard's best, he scored and didn't cost over £50m.
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
4,268
Sancho is basically out, Pellistri is not good enough to start, Amad is injured (and possibly not ready for PL level) and Antony hasn't exactly impressed that much so far. I'd try Mount on RW with Casemiro-Amrabat-Bruno midfield, at least in some games.
 

CallyRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
11,413
He's definetly pressing alright. A pressing concern. Ya know what I'm sayin
 

zaafi

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
3,373
Location
Oslo, Norway
Jesus christ, that League cup game against Palace was a friendly for them. They hardly cared. The PL game was a different kettle of fish and it showed. We dominated feck all, since they let us have the ball and knew we are toothless.
Or maybe it was because Rashford and Bruno played in that game and kept giving it away all the fecking time. Not everything is Mount's fault when he plays with footballers who can't handle a ball.
 

zaafi

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
3,373
Location
Oslo, Norway
It's a slight exaggeration, of course, but I'm really disappointed with his athleticism so far. The application is there but he just lacks both pace and physicality to be a real defensive presence.
He is pretty quick, actually. Good acceleration and can turn quickly. No idea how you can watch him play and say he lacks pace. Quicker than both Bruno and Casemiro.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,143
There has been a slight upturn since his return. I thought the other game was fairly decent and tonight was a little bit better again. Showed some good touches and technique, even a bit of pace at times. Could/should have scored on a couple of occasions which I think he needs to do to justify this kind of role because I'm never expecting any heroics in the buildup.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,493
He wasn't bad tonight, nor was he bad against Palace, but he does not impact football matches.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,539
Location
Hope, We Lose
Not his worst game for us thats for sure. He was okay for a decent amount of the game but I was frustrated when he came on his left foot and shot poorly. Granted a lot of the things he was doing fairly well for a chunk of the game were running off the ball and closing down, or playing a quick pass. Hardly the most eye catching even when we were on top for that period and wasting chances.

I do think he did a fair bit of what he was probably signed to do. I think its similar to the Van De Beek and Ole situation in that a manager signs a player, picks them and they are on the pitch running off the ball as their given task and it just doesnt work out because the distribution to them isnt good enough, and/or in the few times that the ball does go to them from a good run the quality of the end product isnt good enough to give the impression of a good game. But I think its what the managers are likely asking of them to play in that way and it leads to not being on the ball much and being frustrating for fans especially when the team is unsuccessful.
 
Last edited:

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,198
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
I think there's 99% chance that if any new manager comes then one of him or Bruno gets dropped, and I think there's 99% that would have been Bruno.
Mount plays ok with good bits, still a bit within himself but I like him. He can make up for Eriksen lack of mobility as well.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,215
I thought he did well. He makes good decisions, unlike Bruno, which actually benefit the team.
 

thegregster

Harbinger of new information
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
13,638
I think there's 99% chance that if any new manager comes then one of him or Bruno gets dropped, and I think there's 99% that would have been Bruno.
Mount plays ok with good bits, still a bit within himself but I like him. He can make up for Eriksen lack of mobility as well.
I would agree with that. We can only play one of them. Neither should ever play at RW unless we have a crazy injury crisis up front(which is possible :rolleyes: )
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,506
Location
...
Fair play to him, I like what I’ve seen since his return from injury.