What truth?Ah, yes. I forgot that saying the truth which people don't want to hear is not a way to go.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
What truth?Ah, yes. I forgot that saying the truth which people don't want to hear is not a way to go.
Yes he is. I was talking about if Hojlund wants no.9 then give it to him. Martial is gone anyway whether this season or next.Isn't martial already given the 9 though?
He's quite obviously a huge talent. What do you mean by "hoping EtH can see something we can't"? I see massive potential.He's gone from a 9 goal a season striker to potentially £72m (with addons) and our first choice striker.
My god, we really know how to over spend.
Really hoping ETH can see something we cant and he's a huge success.
Yeah it’s tiresome. Spurs doesn’t want to sell to a rival and his wages would have been 3-4 times higher. But yeah, let’s make up a narrative just so that we can continue to moan.People think we would get Kane for £100m
Or just continue to produce academy products i.e. Rashford and GreenwoodAfter Martial, Sancho and Antony, surely we’re due for a big gamble on an attacking player to finally pay off? Because otherwise we’re just going to have to do it again next summer, and it’s getting kinda boring.
Partly agree but we have a manager now who can shield them and guide them, we didn't have that before.72M? Wow!
People saying don't worry about the price, but I believe the reason so many of our new signings flop is due to their overinflated transfer fee that puts a lot of pressure from the get go.
If Hojlund comes in and doesn't hit the ground running, lets be honest, he'll be getting a lot of stick from the media and fans. Obviously not his fault that he's valued at that, but for 72M, we should be getting the finished article, in my opinion.
FFP restrictions. The fact we need 2 strikers this summer and fullbacks as well as a Casemiro backupWho fecking cares about the money!
Or we could just stop gambling and sign established top class players like a big club should be doing?After Martial, Sancho and Antony, surely we’re due for a big gamble on an attacking player to finally pay off? Because otherwise we’re just going to have to do it again next summer, and it’s getting kinda boring.
Maybe we should start supporting our players more, rather than worrying about how much they cost and tearing into them on social media when they're struggling?72M? Wow!
People saying don't worry about the price, but I believe the reason so many of our new signings flop is due to their overinflated transfer fee that puts a lot of pressure from the get go.
If Hojlund comes in and doesn't hit the ground running, lets be honest, he'll be getting a lot of stick from the media and fans. Obviously not his fault that he's valued at that, but for 72M, we should be getting the finished article, in my opinion.
We'd have that no matter who we signed.To be honest, I’m not convinced about any of our signings this summer.
We have a battle on our hands for top 4.
You can't handle the truth.What truth?
Except it was never for sale for 1. It was for sale for what the seller said it was for sale for.If you pay 10 for something with a value of 1 today. If the value is 20 next year, you didnt get a good deal.
You lost out on 9
Nope, not in the early days of his contract. Zero difference.The fact Hojlund was desperate to join us should have strengthened our negotiating position, so I seriously can't make sense of the fee. I know it's not my money but I do care about the club I support not being a laughing stock also.
Some people. So if he scores 30 goals per season for the next 12 years and helps us win Premier and Champions Leagues in that time, we've still overpaid?'kin hell man.
Martial has no future and doesn’t feature. He’s gone either this season or next. If Hojlund wants no. 9 then give it to him I say.I’m not precious, but he’s wearing 9. The same way injured Jones kept 5.
Martial could take 11, but I expect he wouldn't be very pleased about having his number changed again!Yes he is. I was talking about if Hojlund wants no.9 then give it to him. Martial is gone anyway whether this season or next.
ThisTo think at least 80% of the hadnt heard of him 2 months ago
Isn't that part of the fun?To be honest, I’m not convinced about any of our signings this summer.
We have a battle on our hands for top 4.
I get what you mean, but again, I look at Antony, who was worth around 80M and he hasn't really produced, despite being managed by ten Hag.Partly agree but we have a manager now who can shield them and guide them, we didn't have that before.
His fee doesn't worry me.
Its called negotiating. We are quite obviously not good at itExcept it was never for sale for 1. It was for sale for what the seller said it was for sale for.
I’d gladly overpay by 9 if I’m doubling my investment within a year, in your scenario.If you pay 10 for something with a value of 1 today. If the value is 20 next year, you didnt get a good deal.
You lost out on 9
He won’t be getting the 9 this season.Martial has no future and doesn’t feature. He’s gone either this season or next. If Hojlund wants no. 9 then give it to him I say.
My danish friend Rasmus will be joining us. It’s been confirmed 100%. Here I goThink it was @Acquire Me ? Doing his photo shot as we speak?
Ok but they are all ten Hag's top targets and that's all that matters.To be honest, I’m not convinced about any of our signings this summer.
We have a battle on our hands for top 4.
Have you seen how much they cost? Then you have to convince clubs to actually sell them.Or we could just stop gambling and sign established top class players like a big club should be doing?
Be that as it may, it has little to do with whether it's good value if we buy him for a fee and then it doubles in value due to performance and development. Only the most anal analysis of the "theory" behind a transfer value over and above the actual reality could find this observation to be true.Its called negotiating. We are quite obviously not good at it
And how is that his fault? Should he not be given same amount of time to settle as Jackson? Expectations should be the exact same.Not a fair comparison really, Hojlund cost more than twice as much, so a much greater expectation on him.
Id rather a battle for the league.Isn't that part of the fun?