RedCurry
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 4,687
Lottery number please?who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe.
You'd rather have a 27 year old Muller who scored a grand total of 5 league goals last season?
Lottery number please?who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe.
Very silly and naive post.You will find many posters on here who criticize Lukaku during the EPL match day threads and calling him out for being a one-tricky pony, lazy, one-dimensional, a lump etc and these were live matches taking place so its not like people were biased specifically towards him. I guess this is what 4 years of mediocrity does to the club's fans that we've lowered our expectations so much that 3/4 of the forum are delighted with this signing. Under Fergie, he would be seen as a Saha esque signing and it would just be meh for us. He can be very clinical in the league but he's not the kind of striker who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe. The fee we've paid for him is ridiculous, there's a reason why he is a Chelsea reject and he's only performing well in mid-table clubs. His best goal tally came from clubs like West Brom and Everton, with no disrespect. For £75 m, we should be getting one of the top 5 strikers in the world like Lewandowski or Muller. If you factor in inflation, I'd rather we pay another £20 to £30 m more to get a strikers of this calibre. If we can pay £75 m for this donkey, why can't we pay more to tempt Lewandowski? Weren't there reports of him unhappy with Bayern Munich cause he missed out on the top scorer in the league last season, with his agent trying to angle a move for him and you have Aubameyang who looks set to move from Dortmund. These are proven strikers in Europe as well. In fact, I'd rather we take a punt on Morata, I think he has a higher ceiling and is obviously more technical.
What's up with Lukaku's physique? He looks fit but his stomach looks flabby (I'm on mobile tho so maybe it's my screen)
Pogba and Lukaku training at UCLA!!
I actually read all of that. Word for word.You will find many posters on here who criticize Lukaku during the EPL match day threads and calling him out for being a one-tricky pony, lazy, one-dimensional, a lump etc and these were live matches taking place so its not like people were biased specifically towards him. I guess this is what 4 years of mediocrity does to the club's fans that we've lowered our expectations so much that 3/4 of the forum are delighted with this signing. Under Fergie, he would be seen as a Saha esque signing and it would just be meh for us. He can be very clinical in the league but he's not the kind of striker who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe. The fee we've paid for him is ridiculous, there's a reason why he is a Chelsea reject and he's only performing well in mid-table clubs. His best goal tally came from clubs like West Brom and Everton, with no disrespect. For £75 m, we should be getting one of the top 5 strikers in the world like Lewandowski or Muller. If you factor in inflation, I'd rather we pay another £20 to £30 m more to get a strikers of this calibre. If we can pay £75 m for this donkey, why can't we pay more to tempt Lewandowski? Weren't there reports of him unhappy with Bayern Munich cause he missed out on the top scorer in the league last season, with his agent trying to angle a move for him and you have Aubameyang who looks set to move from Dortmund. These are proven strikers in Europe as well. In fact, I'd rather we take a punt on Morata, I think he has a higher ceiling and is obviously more technical.
What a load of rubbish you'd rather we take a punt on Morata?? Why on earth would we take a punt on Morata when Lukaku has proven he can do it playing around really average players he's just turned 24 I love the way people know for fact he can't develop his hold up game and his touch etc pure madness what some people type these days.You will find many posters on here who criticize Lukaku during the EPL match day threads and calling him out for being a one-tricky pony, lazy, one-dimensional, a lump etc and these were live matches taking place so its not like people were biased specifically towards him. I guess this is what 4 years of mediocrity does to the club's fans that we've lowered our expectations so much that 3/4 of the forum are delighted with this signing. Under Fergie, he would be seen as a Saha esque signing and it would just be meh for us. He can be very clinical in the league but he's not the kind of striker who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe. The fee we've paid for him is ridiculous, there's a reason why he is a Chelsea reject and he's only performing well in mid-table clubs. His best goal tally came from clubs like West Brom and Everton, with no disrespect. For £75 m, we should be getting one of the top 5 strikers in the world like Lewandowski or Muller. If you factor in inflation, I'd rather we pay another £20 to £30 m more to get a strikers of this calibre. If we can pay £75 m for this donkey, why can't we pay more to tempt Lewandowski? Weren't there reports of him unhappy with Bayern Munich cause he missed out on the top scorer in the league last season, with his agent trying to angle a move for him and you have Aubameyang who looks set to move from Dortmund. These are proven strikers in Europe as well. In fact, I'd rather we take a punt on Morata, I think he has a higher ceiling and is obviously more technical.
People clearly do not think before they type.Only an idiot would call him a Chelsea reject if for no other reason THEY WERE TRYING TO SIGN HIM THEIRSELVES!!
I am not Lukaku's biggest fan (as I feel he is yet to live up to the potential he showed as a teenager) but he is no more a Chelsea reject than De Bruyne is.You will find many posters on here who criticize Lukaku during the EPL match day threads and calling him out for being a one-tricky pony, lazy, one-dimensional, a lump etc and these were live matches taking place so its not like people were biased specifically towards him. I guess this is what 4 years of mediocrity does to the club's fans that we've lowered our expectations so much that 3/4 of the forum are delighted with this signing. Under Fergie, he would be seen as a Saha esque signing and it would just be meh for us. He can be very clinical in the league but he's not the kind of striker who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe. The fee we've paid for him is ridiculous, there's a reason why he is a Chelsea reject and he's only performing well in mid-table clubs. His best goal tally came from clubs like West Brom and Everton, with no disrespect. For £75 m, we should be getting one of the top 5 strikers in the world like Lewandowski or Muller. If you factor in inflation, I'd rather we pay another £20 to £30 m more to get a strikers of this calibre. If we can pay £75 m for this donkey, why can't we pay more to tempt Lewandowski? Weren't there reports of him unhappy with Bayern Munich cause he missed out on the top scorer in the league last season, with his agent trying to angle a move for him and you have Aubameyang who looks set to move from Dortmund. These are proven strikers in Europe as well. In fact, I'd rather we take a punt on Morata, I think he has a higher ceiling and is obviously more technical.
Muller would been an extraordinarily silly signingLottery number please?
You'd rather have a 27 year old Muller who scored a grand total of 5 league goals last season?
What's up with Lukaku's physique? He looks fit but his stomach looks flabby (I'm on mobile tho so maybe it's my screen)
Jose, Mata, maybe Matic and maybe Lukaku. It'll be Mikel and Hilario next.Only an idiot would call him a Chelsea reject if for no other reason THEY WERE TRYING TO SIGN HIM THEIRSELVES!!
Whats the general consensus among Chelsea fans that you guys missed out on Lukaku? Genuinely curious.Jose, Mata, maybe Matic and maybe Lukaku. It'll be Mikel and Hilario next.
So true. It's a weird phenomena.Always wonder if people disputing the price of players go up to their friends and tell them their paying too much for a steak and that there's either more value in getting the 3 course meal instead, or simply opting for a cheaper dish like pie and mash because, you know, it's just as filling in the end.
Because that's honestly what the discussion sounds like sometimes.
I wish I looked that flabby.What's up with Lukaku's physique? He looks fit but his stomach looks flabby (I'm on mobile tho so maybe it's my screen)
If we miss out on him, I'll let you know!Whats the general consensus among Chelsea fans that you guys missed out on Lukaku? Genuinely curious.
Kind of pointless since the fans are not the ones buying or selling players.
This is what Everton fans valued him at 6 months ago
Always wonder if people disputing the price of players go up to their friends and tell them their paying too much for a steak and that there's either more value in getting the 3 course meal instead, or simply opting for a cheaper dish like pie and mash because, you know, it's just as filling in the end.
Because that's honestly what the discussion sounds like sometimes.
Clearly none of them know what they are talking about (aside from maybe the guy who said £50-60m). How would he be worth less than Lacazette for example, when he's got a couple of years on him and he's scored similar levels of goals - penalties aside - in a much better league?
This is what Everton fans valued him at 6 months ago
Me too. It's ten years since I had visible stomach muscles. Lukaku is fit as hell imo.I wish I looked that flabby.
This is what I feel whenever a "fat" footballer is posted here.I wish I looked that flabby.
I think Hazard has also been underwhelming for the Belgium team. In fact, plenty of club stars aren't able to turn it up for their country.One thing I worry for is that he's been underwhelming for Belgium too; maybe he's just not elite.
There are so many things wrong with this post. By all means have reservations about Lukaku, you're not alone in that, and there's loads of people who would have preferred other options. But the argument's you've made seem a bit odd.You will find many posters on here who criticize Lukaku during the EPL match day threads and calling him out for being a one-tricky pony, lazy, one-dimensional, a lump etc and these were live matches taking place so its not like people were biased specifically towards him. I guess this is what 4 years of mediocrity does to the club's fans that we've lowered our expectations so much that 3/4 of the forum are delighted with this signing. Under Fergie, he would be seen as a Saha esque signing and it would just be meh for us. He can be very clinical in the league but he's not the kind of striker who takes us to the next level to challenge in Europe. The fee we've paid for him is ridiculous, there's a reason why he is a Chelsea reject and he's only performing well in mid-table clubs. His best goal tally came from clubs like West Brom and Everton, with no disrespect. For £75 m, we should be getting one of the top 5 strikers in the world like Lewandowski or Muller. If you factor in inflation, I'd rather we pay another £20 to £30 m more to get a strikers of this calibre. If we can pay £75 m for this donkey, why can't we pay more to tempt Lewandowski? Weren't there reports of him unhappy with Bayern Munich cause he missed out on the top scorer in the league last season, with his agent trying to angle a move for him and you have Aubameyang who looks set to move from Dortmund. These are proven strikers in Europe as well. In fact, I'd rather we take a punt on Morata, I think he has a higher ceiling and is obviously more technical.
Always wonder if people disputing the price of players go up to their friends and tell them their paying too much for a steak and that there's either more value in getting the 3 course meal instead, or simply opting for a cheaper dish like pie and mash because, you know, it's just as filling in the end.
Because that's honestly what the discussion sounds like sometimes.
Feck me, that's class photoshop if not real.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If that is real, then Everton will be rightly pissed as they have not officially agreed to anything.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This looks shopped, I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
A shite photoshop.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I felt really bad when they said Frank Lampard was fatThis is what I feel whenever a "fat" footballer is posted here.
Not really. Bottom half of his neck is a completely different colour to his upper half and head.Feck me, that's class photoshop if not real.
One thing of modern elite strikers is being able to create chances on their own, Lacazette has that potential I think. Very good dribbler, excellent technique, lethal, fast, quick, agile, skillful. Lukaku is an excellent finisher, so is Kane, but is that enough to provide against the elite defences? Thats why Aguero, Suarez, Lewandowski, Aubameyang, Messi, Benzema, Tevez, van Persie, Rooney in recent years were in a class of their own. Lukaku needs to work a lot on that. He is very good running into space imo, thats one.Clearly none of them know what they are talking about (aside from maybe the guy who said £50-60m). How would he be worth less than Lacazette for example, when he's got a couple of years on him and he's scored similar levels of goals - penalties aside - in a much better league?