kundalini
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2004
- Messages
- 5,756
Decent first half. Crap 2nd half. Touch deserted him.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
He has just come back from injury and tired, obviously.Good game? Wow. He was utterly shit in the second half.
It was like having Scholes back. Pinging 30 yard balls to Val on the wing. That is how we scored too.Only saw the second half, wasn't impressed but fair enough if the first half was better.
He's not finished per se, only at the top level.Been saying it all season.
He's been crap throughout 2015. He is not the same Rooney but he is not finished.
He has just come back from injury and tired, obviously.
I thought he was excellent in the first half and exposed the limitations of Lingard as a 10. Lingard just doesn't drop deep to link the midfield and attack after he came on we lost control of the game and created only two more chances IIRC.
OK, excellent was a stretch but I thought he was our key player in the first half.But he was still mediocre overall yet again. And it doesnt take much effort to expose Lingard's limitations. He had a couple of good crosses but he was far from excellent.
wow, aston villa this year has been possibly the shittest premier league team in new era, on par with all those wigan sides.. he had some moments but our U18 team would beat them... chinese clubs may consider to make a move based on this game thoughBeen saying it all season.
He's been crap throughout 2015. He is not the same Rooney but he is not finished.
I can't stand him but he ran the game for about 30 mins, and was involved in the goal.Only saw the second half, wasn't impressed but fair enough if the first half was better.
I don't have the answer to that as I am unsure myself. My point is he has not been falcao'd as many suggested on here.He's not finished per se, only at the top level.
Can you see United winning the title with Rooney as the main man in attack, ot the CL? Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to me impossible.
We are making the life of Liverpool and City easier by insisting on Rooney.
Statistically, he's still worse in the league this season than Falcao last season. May sound increidble but you can do the math (I mean the ratio of goals/assists to played minutes).I don't have the answer to that as I am unsure myself. My point is he has not been falcao'd as many suggested on here.
How he generated more power with his first touch than the pass from Memphis is incredible.
He has. He's not good enough for a top half club. Atleast Falcao was left out of the team after his shit performances. Rooney has been on the decline for years and done at top level for the last two.I don't have the answer to that as I am unsure myself. My point is he has not been falcao'd as many suggested on here.
So you're telling me Rooney isn't good enough for Southampton/Stoke or West Ham?He has. He's not good enough for a top half club. Atleast Falcao was left out of the team after his shit performances. Rooney has been on the decline for years and done at top level for the last two.
This. Pretty much sums him up nicely.He doesn't offer anything. Well, except the odd cross field diagonal pass that has all the pundits spooging over how "he's back".
Could say the same about....He's not finished per se, only at the top level.
Can you see United winning the title with Rooney as the main man in attack, ot the CL? Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to me impossible.
We are making the life of Liverpool and City easier by insisting on Rooney.