I also read books with words.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Reading material you disagree with sharpens your thinking.
I have most of David Irving's books. I also have books by Ian Kershaw, Richard Evans and Robert Jan Van Pelt, among other authors on WWII.
My range of books on Israel and the Arabs is just as broad. I have books by both the 'Old' Historians' (Efraim Karsh, Yoav Gelber, Shabtai Teveth, ectra) and the 'New' Historians (Benny Morris, Avi Shlaim, Simha Flapan, ectra).
Owen Jones should try reading a book he disagrees with sometime. He might learn something.
Yes, I too was struck by the great breadth of views populating Gove's bookshelf. One could hardly say he isn't well rounded in his reading habits.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Reading material you disagree with sharpens your thinking.
I have most of David Irving's books. I also have books by Ian Kershaw, Richard Evans and Robert Jan Van Pelt, among other authors on WWII.
My range of books on Israel and the Arabs is just as broad. I have books by both the 'Old' Historians' (Efraim Karsh, Yoav Gelber, Shabtai Teveth, ectra) and the 'New' Historians (Benny Morris, Avi Shlaim, Simha Flapan, ectra).
Owen Jones should try reading a book he disagrees with sometime. He might learn something.
I agree. It's not the broadest range of reading material you'll ever see. But at least he is will to read books by authors he disagrees with, judging by his article in The Times.Yes, I too was struck by the great breadth of views populating Gove's bookshelf. One could hardly say he isn't well rounded in his reading habits.
Tbf, he shags enough to be 007
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Shouldnt you be on this bandwagon
Perfectly sums up the view of islamophobia with certain people on here. Completely ignore it and talk about the labour party and Corbyn instead.
Nice one lads.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
My comment was in jest.
Perfectly sums up the view of islamophobia with certain people on here. Completely ignore it and talk about the labour party and Corbyn instead.
Nice one lads.
Shouldn't you be on any other bandwagon?Shouldnt you be on this bandwagon
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
By the way do you agree the EHRC is an independent body and its judgement on this and the labour party investigation is to be trusted.
Mate when I accuse you of disliking black labour mp's or being an arse towards socialist women in the labour party(''Corbyn in a skirt'' such a classy line) or actually not caring about anti semitism due to the constant shit posting of ''ironic'' anti semitic jokes, I'm using you're own posts on this forum, not just some random off twitter or the lefty you've made up in you're mind(Which seems to be a common thing on here now)Shouldnt you be on this bandwagon
Yeah I would say it's investigation is to be trusted. No offence(Although I'm about to say something offensive)I'm not like yourself, I'm not some bizarre labour right doomer who doesn't give a shit about well anything. My politics isn't based off the single goal of bemoaning anyone who even attempts to give a shit about helping people.By the way do you agree the EHRC is an independent body and its judgement on this and the labour party investigation is to be trusted.
I mean just a few examples - Senior Conservatives Baroness Warsi has said the party is islamophobic, the party has suspended party members for being islamophobic, the Muslim Council of Britain has asked for an investigation into islamophobia in the tory party. Also just recently -Though there is not much to comment on. They've said they don't deem it suitable to investigate as of yet, but will monitor closely the Tory investigation and go from there (I do believe there are issues of islamophobia in the party, whether or not it is institutional however I'm not so sure).
Its some cheek for them to say they don't deem it suitable to investigate as of yet.Shaun Bailey, the Conservative candidate for the 2020 London mayoral election, wrote a pamphlet in 2005 for the Centre for Policy Studies complaining that immigrants to the UK being allowed to "bring their culture, their country and any problems they might have with them" and observing non-Christian festivals has turned Britain into a "crime-ridden cesspool" and "robs Britain of its community".[12] In September 2018, he shared a tweet referring to Labour's incumbent Mayor of London Sadiq Khan as "mad mullah Khan of Londonistan"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobia_in_the_UK_Conservative_Party_(1997–present)
Good article, worth a read.It is highly unusual for a political party to meet the EHRC’s evidence threshold that is required for it even to begin an investigation into institutional racism. The presence of individuals with racist views in any organisation is not enough to warrant an investigation: there must be evidence that its mechanisms, culture and policies may have unlawfully discriminated against a particular group of people. The only other political party to have met this threshold was the British National Party (BNP), a neo-fascist political party, in 2010
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The government acted unlawfully when it refused to compensate two low-income households left up to £180 a month out of pocket when their legacy benefits were wrongly stopped and they had no choice but to move on to universal credit, the appeal court has ruled.
Although the households were significantly worse off on universal credit – and had successfully challenged the official error that ended their previous benefits – the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) argued it would be too costly and administratively complex to move them back to the old system.
The ruling holds out the prospect of redress for potentially thousands of claimants who have lost out after moving to universal credit as a result of official error. They could now be able to return to their old benefits or have their universal credit awards topped up to previous levels.
The two households – one a single mother who gave up work to care for her disabled teenage daughter, the other a woman with mobility difficulties – lost about £140 and £180 a month respectively after they were moved on to universal credit, which they subsequently discovered meant a cut in benefits.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...laimants-unlawfully-short-changed-court-rules
Or its a very high bar to instigate action which is suggested by how infrequently action is taken. Corbyn's Labour party cleared that bar. You can't see what that means about the Labour Party because you are a supporter of Corbyn's labour party and the independent metric is pointing out that you are in fact "the nice bloke but christ your political views are rotten".Mate when I accuse you of disliking black labour mp's or being an arse towards socialist women in the labour party(''Corbyn in a skirt'' such a classy line) or actually not caring about anti semitism due to the constant shit posting of ''ironic'' anti semitic jokes, I'm using you're own posts on this forum, not just some random off twitter or the lefty you've made up in you're mind(Which seems to be a common thing on here now)
Yeah I would say it's investigation is to be trusted. No offence(Although I'm about to say something offensive)I'm not like yourself, I'm not some bizarre labour right doomer who doesn't give a shit about well anything. My politics isn't based off the single goal of bemoaning anyone who even attempts to give a shit about helping people.
I'm sure you're a nice bloke but christ you're political views are rotten.
I mean just a few examples - Senior Conservatives Baroness Warsi has said the party is islamophobic, the party has suspended party members for being islamophobic, the Muslim Council of Britain has asked for an investigation into islamophobia in the tory party. Also just recently -
Its some cheek for them to say they don't deem it suitable to investigate as of yet.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Testing the water for a return to austerity, surprised it’s taken this long
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
God I hope you didn't spend all night coming up with this.Or its a very high bar to instigate action which is suggested by how infrequently action is taken. Corbyn's Labour party cleared that bar. You can't see what that means about the Labour Party because you are a supporter of Corbyn's labour party and the independent metric is pointing out that you are in fact "the nice bloke but christ your political views are rotten".
So not so much cheek , as you insinuating bias because you don't like the verdict. Its a bit Trump like if I'm honest. If this organisation had pulled the conservatives you would have defended its impartial nature to the bitter end and questioned the state of the party and called any mention of wrong doing in labour as whataboutism.
no i don't think so.After all that noise, did the report about the Labour establishment even make it to ECHR?
Labour lawyers chose not to send it - It has been leaked extensively though so the EHRC will be aware of it and if they believe it is relevant to the investigation they could formally request a copyAfter all that noise, did the report about the Labour establishment even make it to ECHR?
I think a lot of people in the private sector would take a 2 year pay freeze right now if it meant they kept their job - I actually would expect overall wage deflation in the Uk for the next few years rather than a pay riseTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Testing the water for a return to austerity, surprised it’s taken this long
Income tax yes Id expect that to rise as well as VAT, NI, Stamp Duty, Corporation tax and I fully expect the self employed to be put on taxes closer to PAYE... basically if its a tax its going to rise but this will probably happen in most countries anyway.Chancellor Philip Hammond hinted the State Pension would no longer be ring-fenced from spending cuts after 2020 – raising for the first time the prospect of pensioners' benefits being cut as part of the government's austerity measures.[citation needed] Benefits for the elderly had been exempt from reductions and the chancellor confirmed during the Autumn Statement 2016 that the state pension would continue to rise until at least 2020.
Is that austerity? Isn't this the opposite - increasing public spending (furlough scheme, infrastructure stimulus etc), combine with tax rises? Seems that the current strategy is more Keynes than Osborne.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Testing the water for a return to austerity, surprised it’s taken this long
coolno i don't think so.
They really had no choice but to spend a huge amount of money with the lockdown. The promised extra infrastructure spending may still be on the cards but could easily still be dropped in favour of more austerity. They have a ready made excuse, after all.Is that austerity? Isn't this the opposite - increasing public spending (furlough scheme, infrastructure stimulus etc), combine with tax rises? Seems that the current strategy is more Keynes than Osborne.
And I think most on here agree that getting rid of the pension triple lock is long overdue, given the intergenerational inequalities that have built up since the GFC.
In fairness it's just a 800+ page report about how the internal workings of the labour party stopped it from investigating anti semitism and also included cases of targeted attacks of black labour mp's.cool
I'm not sure that's what is happening here. I'd say that's just a scenario paper and it's been intentionally leaked to make their actual position going forward seem reasonable in comparison.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Testing the water for a return to austerity, surprised it’s taken this long
Agree. I just think it's an important distinction that the response to this hasn't been austerity. If the next response of the government is to switch towards greater austerity to pay down a ballooned deficit, I think that would be a dreadful error. Though I also think it seems unlikely, given the response so far, and messaging from the Conservatives.They really had no choice but to spend a huge amount of money with the lockdown. The promised extra infrastructure spending may still be on the cards but could easily still be dropped in favour of more austerity. They have a ready made excuse, after all.
To assume they have seen the light, is to give them credit which they have done little to earn.