croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 34,704
Hopefully goal gives him a lift,can't wait to go absolutely mental when he scores a massive one
How low do you want to set the bar?Deserves a contract more than Phil Jones
Eh I think ETH more wants the barebones of what WW offers, but I'd be shocked if he actually wanted him on a permanent deal (unless we got him for pennies and he was fine being a 3rd choice type). If he was a step or two quicker then we'd really have something, but he's just not fast enough to get onto the end of those passes on the counter that we like to play (Ronaldo had a similar issue this year; always a step slow)I’m liking his play.
Only concern is we’re reliant on goals from Rashford at the moment, if he dries up we’d be up shit creek. Need Bruno and Antony to up their numbers, Wout is freeing them but they’re not putting them away.
Wout brings an important presence in that final third; someone who is occupying the defence with his relentless pressing and movement, and someone who can comfortably receive a ball to feet and hold up or play it on.
I just think it’s a bit of a romantic idea having a skilful 9 running through and banging them in; every fan of the game loves a classic 9… But I can see Ten Hag’s vision and I’m not against looking at this route instead.
If Ten Hag doesn’t want a 30 goal striker and sees the strategy as having a 15 goal striker who frees up the three surrounding players to spread out the goals I’d back him. A whole season and another pre-season with potentially another 2-3 additions to the squad, all of whom will be fitter and more experienced in Ten Hag’s play… we could be flying.
Perfect scenario would be having two players comfortable in the middle; one who allows for fluid interchanging play between the forward line (an Nkunku type), and a second false nine type. Gives us two very distinct options but both fit around the style of play Ten Hag wants.
Yeah I’m not advocating as Wout to be “the man” for us. But going down the Wout-type route as our main forward, or having a Wout-type to be our secondary nine.Eh I think ETH more wants the barebones of what WW offers, but I'd be shocked if he actually wanted him on a permanent deal (unless we got him for pennies and he was fine being a 3rd choice type). If he was a step or two quicker then we'd really have something, but he's just not fast enough to get onto the end of those passes on the counter that we like to play (Ronaldo had a similar issue this year; always a step slow)
We don't need a yeti, let the dutchman scoreThe Wout
The Wout
The Wout IS ON FIRE
Wait till they have time to train. With this agenda there is no time to train.This team looks much better with a striker.
This team is also not used to play with a striker, very little chemistry between him, Rashford and Antony. I think he's got the best effect on Bruno.
Knew that and doesn't bother meHis issue is his pace, kind of slow. But if we are dominating the opponents, he will grab a pretty amount of goals and help create situations for the teammates to score.
That could be due to his lack of pace.His first clear cut chance in 3 games and he takes it. That's good.
I'm happy he got his first goal, hoping for more once he has more confidence.
I don't think people are necessarily criticising him on this, more so wondering why we didn't go for a striker more mobile on loan.If you judge him on the things he was bought to do (pressing, hold-up, linking, interceptions, not being injured) then he is doing just fine.
Criticising him for not being a speed merchant with great dribbling skills is a moot point really as that is just not his game.
Reading and Forest up next, let’s see how he gets on in those matches…could be a nice run of games for him.
Because better strikers would be more expensive or simply not available.I don't think people are necessarily criticising him on this, more so wondering why we didn't go for a striker more mobile on loan.
He's doing well though.
Yeah but he doesn't play like a big targetman does he.Because better strikers would be more expensive or simply not available.
It was Weghorst or Aboubakar, I think we made the right choice.
It seems like fans are either too young or have simply forgotton what a big targetman plays like. He's doing the role really well and enabling our midfield/wingers to get into the game and score.
I agree. It was not a tap-in. The goalie was still in front of him. Great finish.I've watched the goal several times this morning in a replay and let me assure you that goal wasn't as easy as he made it look. Many players would have fumbled or shoot it miles high out of the stadium.
Plus other key attributes that current/previous strikers didn't have, such as 'Not randomly going to South America' , 'Not throwing a paddy when substituted', 'Not being best mates with Pierce Morgan' ...If you judge him on the things he was bought to do (pressing, hold-up, linking, interceptions, not being injured) then he is doing just fine.
Back to goal, holding off defenders and being used as a wall for 1-2's? looking to get on the end of crosses? dropping deep and playing flicks around the corner to runners? sure he does.Yeah but he doesn't play like a big targetman does he.
If you say so, I'm not a scout for United, just a fan so admittedly have no idea what our full options were. If it was just between those two as you say it's the right choice.Because better strikers would be more expensive or simply not available.
It was Weghorst or Aboubakar, I think we made the right choice.
It seems like fans are either too young or have simply forgotton what a big targetman plays like. He's doing the role really well and enabling our midfield/wingers to get into the game and score.
In his three games for us so far, I've counted two passes/crosses to him in the box, both came in last night's game. That whipped cross from Pellistri where he headed wide and the ball from Anthony I think, where it looked for a moment like he was through but his lack of pace showed and the defender blocked his sliding shot.We need to play more passes into him. Got him more involved today. Hopefully will continue to get better.
Yeees....but there's also some elements that kind of contradict the idea. He doesn't receive the ball much (strikingly seldom actually), although when he does it's almost invariably with his back to goal. And there's not a lot of high balls or crosses going on, which you usually associate with a target man. He can't have been doing a lot of flicks around the corners to runners (if I understand correctly what you mean by that), given that he's got 0 progressive passes in his first 2 PL games (and a progressive distance of 26 yards for all his 28 completed passes combined).Back to goal, holding off defenders and being used as a wall for 1-2's? looking to get on the end of crosses? dropping deep and playing flicks around the corner to runners? sure he does.