FC Ronaldo
Posts stuff that's been said before in tweet form
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
- Messages
- 12,043
I'd take him personally, if its between Walcott and Rashford then its a no brainer. Hes a wildcard that defences wont know much about and even if he doesnt play he will benefit hugely from the experience.
If only we had Iheancho as well. Could have had the most promising young strike force in the world.Iheanacho : "Rashford is a great young talent. He is big and strong and makes good decisions so I think he's going to be a really good player for United in the coming years. You can learn from every player, so I've learned from Rashford as well this season"
http://www.skysports.com/football/n...nge-is-great-says-man-citys-kelechi-iheanacho
If it's a striker choice then likely to be between Defoe, Sturridge and Rashford.I'd take him personally, if its between Walcott and Rashford then its a no brainer. Hes a wildcard that defences wont know much about and even if he doesnt play he will benefit hugely from the experience.
Forget positions as England have a lot of versatile players, for one Rashford should be able to play RW anyway as he has for Utd before, it's about quality and Walcott is shite whereas Rashford is a wildcard.If it's a striker choice then likely to be between Defoe, Sturridge and Rashford.
If it's between Walcott and Rashford then it's likely to be for the wide right slot where England don't have that many options right now.
You have to also consider that Wayne Rooney is guaranteed to go, despite Hodgson likely being aware that he is no use to anyone up front. So one of the striker slots will be effectively going to a midfielder already, so cover up top is needed.If it's a striker choice then likely to be between Defoe, Sturridge and Rashford.
If it's between Walcott and Rashford then it's likely to be for the wide right slot where England don't have that many options right now.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-aad46fca-734a-45f9-8721-61404cc12a39Seems to be named in the provisional England squad.
Did someone actually say he's not quick?Who said he wasn't pacy? That was a funny one. He's lightning quick. Great composure as well. Looks quite strong for his age
Spot on. The biggest change for next season has to be finding players who want to play through the lines and get the centre forward involved. He makes so many runs but the guys behind him only look sideways.A young player having that awareness after being starved of any service is great to see.
What a waste of time it is for him in all honesty. Not one player looks for him. No one plays to his strengths.
Someone said he had a decent turn of pace, but that he hasn't shown that he is properly fast. He's up there with Martial, Shaw and Valencia with Smalling as a dark horse. Would like to see a race between them - one with the ball and one without like they did with Lennon, Agbonlahor and Walcott (not against each other, but against the clock).Did someone actually say he's not quick?
He's probably the fastest player in our team.
He'll put on a bit of muscle over the next few years but he's quite wiry now. He just needs a less useless ref to call the fouls on him.Very exciting player, but the England call-up is very premature, even for the provisional squad.
He's got pace in abundance, impressive movement and clearly an eye for goal, but I can't help but feel he's still a bit physically lacking. Tall, but could be a bit bulkier.
You should try using a thesaurus.He's such a bright player, his finishing is excellent, his movement is excellent, his awareness is excellent. What I'm trying to say is, he's excellent.