ZlatMan
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2018
- Messages
- 491
Walcott score from an impossible angle
he is hurt now hope you are happyArnautovic is garbage. He thinks he is too highly of himself
Where did I say that.Let's just write off history then. I guess City will be bigger than Liverpool soon?
Maybe that's just you.History counts for feck all and less and less so as time goes by.
Now, Chelsea. 10 years ago, Arsenal without a doubt. Clubs grow in stature, and decline in stature. There was a time when Ajax were one of the worlds biggest clubs, would you call them that now?
The clubs you've mentioned have totally dropped off from being relevant and have plummeted to the lower leagues, they haven't just had lean years in terms of a trophy. Liverpool are still hugely relevant, and have a history which pisses all over anybody in the league aside from United.Where did I say that.
History counts for feck all and less and less so as time goes by.
Using the history logic Villa, Huddersfield, Preston and Sunderland are bigger clubs than Spurs... you know that's not true in this day and age. History counts for feck all and will less and less as for better or worse fans become more attracted to instant success.
Their was a time when Bayern had no history and were little players in the Bundesliga, same with PSG. Both are easily their leagues biggest clubs.
I have no clue if City will be bigger than Liverpool or not in 10 years or 20 years, I won't be guessing the future either but I can see what's clear as day in front of me. Chelsea currently are a bigger club than Liverpool no doubt in every measurable metric.
They arent bigger but have been far more successful in recent history.Apparently we now judge the size of football clubs purely on revenue.
I am never happy when a player gets injuredhe is hurt now hope you are happy
SuspendedVardy is injured?
This is what playing for West Ham will do to you.Hernandez looks....a bit older
Good. Deserved to be sent off just for his reaction to Richarlison.Adam Smith sent off for Bournemouth. Ten a side.
....and fan base.Chelsea and Arsenal are both bigger clubs than Liverpool in just about every metric except trophies.
Recent success does not = bigger club, at least not as far as I am concerned. History matters.They arent bigger but have been far more successful in recent history.
Nope....and fan base.
not for £50m.People still laughing at Arnautovic as a decent backup striker?
The debate is so thought provoking, we'll be reading "my dad is stronger than your dad" any time now. Perhaps they should settle the old Xbox versus Playstation debate while they're at it.Ffs, go away with your pointless bigger debates.
if that was true then yeah of course notnot for £50m.
Sweet Jesus. I thought he was an Arsenal fan. Chelsea are at best the 4th biggest club in the landHe thinks Chelsea are bigger, not Arsenal.
Which is worse ..
Been seeing your posts lately and fair play, you speak some of the most sense I’ve seen an opposition fan speak towards other teams.The clubs you've mentioned have totally dropped off from being relevant and have plummeted to the lower leagues, they haven't just had lean years in terms of a trophy. Liverpool are still hugely relevant, and have a history which pisses all over anybody in the league aside from United.
Shocker as Manchester City fan doesn't rate history as important. Just because you were founded when the oil money came flooding in doesn't mean everybody else is going to forget what came before it.
Yes it does but so does the present.Recent success does not = bigger club, at least not as far as I am concerned. History matters.
They haven't won the league in 28 years, how long is 'recent' supposed to be exactly?Recent success does not = bigger club, at least not as far as I am concerned. History matters.
History does matter yes. However it diminishes over time and recent success also matters. Clubs don't stay big clubs forever, just because they have a history.Recent success does not = bigger club, at least not as far as I am concerned. History matters.
Probably was. He's West Ham's star man and had a great season, you're easily looking at around that figure for a player like that these days.if that was true then yeah of course not
There's nothing strange about it. He's wildly inconsistent and has been all throughout his career, he has a massive ego and wouldn't accept second fiddle and he would cost an asinine amount of money due to the astronomical fees in this league in particular.Some people here are strange, it's like if it's not a WC signing they don't want to know.