The relationship between poverty and abuse is well documented, there’s also many more factors to take into account than just poor people bad, which is the highly reductive view you’re trying to push. The link between poverty, education and violence isn’t what we’re arguing though.
This is what you said. The reasonable conclusion here is that you believe because of the context surrounding Ryan’s childhood he shouldn’t be castigated for assaulting his partner, nor should he be expected to adhere to the sky high expectations of not assaulting his partner.
Have I? I’ve posted a part of our exchange below where I find it pretty hard to not come to the interpretation I did.
It seems pretty literal to me.
[/QUO
Ha, how pathetic can’t win this argument so you go through all that above. You lost buddy