ArmchairCritic
You got pets me too mines are dead
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 16,456
What time is quali?
17:00.
What time is quali?
17:00.
Damn. I really wanted Schumacher to win F2. Doesn't he need a decent result to seal the title?
Makes a lot of difference.I was having a think earlier, only because seeing Russell’s performance, it made me wonder what other factors impact performance outside of purely car and driver talent. I’m not raising the question because I’m trying to diminish what Hamilton has done or indeed Russell did in his first practices.
It’s all good having the same underlying car. But isn’t there so much more that goes into it then that? What about all the tweaks one can make to set up? What about the ability of engineers to translate issues drivers are facing on the track with solutions to the set up of the car?
I guess my point is, how much do the mechanics and engineers who support team Hamilton make a difference if they’re simply better than those who support Bottas? I imagine there is a lot of cross share between the two but I also imagine there must ultimately be two teams responsible for each? Or am I just wrong and the point irrelevant?
Yes it’s true, but pretty much 99% of champions win because they’re in the best car. Technology has always guided who wins, even as far back as the 80s.I don't think he is successful because of luck, he is one of the best drivers of all time. But an unstoppable car certainly played a significant role in winning 6 of the last 7 titles (and the 7th was won by the same car) just like it did when Red Bull won 4 in a row before that.
And its awful for the sport to have 2 teams win in 11 years. 10 of them by the same 2 drivers - one of whom is currently stuck in the midfield.
No. They wouldn’t drop the most successful driver of all time. Especially as they aren’t developing the car over this summer and the budget cap for development comes in next year.If Russell dominates this weekend. Would Merc consider ditching Hamilton?
Lewis is on 33m a season surley George would accept 3m?
30m worth of Car development a season added. Lewis hasn't signed for next year, be no issue getting George out of his Williams seat with power unit deals.
In the past, the best car changed from season to season. There was a lot more variety at the front, especially in the 80s and 90s when no team won more than 2 titles in a row.Yes it’s true, but pretty much 99% of champions win because they’re in the best car.
That would be stupid move.If Russell dominates this weekend. Would Merc consider ditching Hamilton?
Lewis is on 33m a season surley George would accept 3m?
30m worth of Car development a season added. Lewis hasn't signed for next year, be no issue getting George out of his Williams seat with power unit deals.
I was having a think earlier, only because seeing Russell’s performance, it made me wonder what other factors impact performance outside of purely car and driver talent. I’m not raising the question because I’m trying to diminish what Hamilton has done or indeed Russell did in his first practices.
It’s all good having the same underlying car. But isn’t there so much more that goes into it then that? What about all the tweaks one can make to set up? What about the ability of engineers to translate issues drivers are facing on the track with solutions to the set up of the car?
I guess my point is, how much do the mechanics and engineers who support team Hamilton make a difference if they’re simply better than those who support Bottas? I imagine there is a lot of cross share between the two but I also imagine there must ultimately be two teams responsible for each? Or am I just wrong and the point irrelevant?
“With last year’s car for example, we had the longest car. It’s definitely been a bit of a surprise to see that none of the other teams have gone to the longest car. We’ve been winning with the longest car since 2017, and they [other teams] are so stuck in the way they do things, in that ‘we’re still going to keep our car shorter.’ Being that it’s a long car, it’s obviously got great downforce, but it’s not as nimble as a shorter car. Last year our car was good through medium and high-speed corners, but was quite poor in low-speed corners. The car would not rotate as well as we’d like. We started this year in winter testing and the car had similar characteristics. I had some challenges that I put towards the team in terms of how we set the car up, which changed that. It’s difficult to say too much but that difficulty we had last year with the car rotating, we don’t have that problem any more.”
Hamilton says he is a driver who always prefers a responsive front end to a car, which has not always been something that Mercedes has delivered in recent seasons. However, he says dialling out the setup characteristics has not been the work of the moment, because of the complexity involved in ensuring a change in car balance does not hurt the tyres too much.
“I’ve always preferred a more positive front end in the car,” he said. “But there’s a limitation with these tyres. The front has a limitation, the rear has a limitation, grip wise. There’s saturation, there’s thermal deg and there’s only a certain amount you can do with the mechanical balance before it affects the other end. It’s like a see-saw. Last year our car was definitely very, very strong at the rear, and the car was generally driven by the rear end. The front was a lot more understeery last year. You struggled a lot more when you go over the tyre [grip] and no matter how much we put the mechanical rearwards it wouldn’t really fix it. This year we have made some changes.With the aero balance it’s a much longer process. You can’t just change it. Definitely over the winter we fixed it and moved the aero balance more rearwards, so the car was shifting different, and also at different steering angles and different yaw. So it definitely is working a lot better.”
In the past, the best car changed from season to season. There was a lot more variety at the front, especially in the 80s and 90s when no team won more than 2 titles in a row.
Nowadays periods of domination are becoming increasing longer and longer. Mercedes have won 7 titles in a row which is the longest streak ever, and Red Bull won 4 titles in a row previous to that. In the last 11 years only 2 teams have won titles, which is basically unheard of in the history of F1.
In the past, the best car changed from season to season.
No. Only reason they'll not have Lewis next year is if he decides he wants to retire.If Russell dominates this weekend. Would Merc consider ditching Hamilton?
Lewis is on 33m a season surley George would accept 3m?
30m worth of Car development a season added. Lewis hasn't signed for next year, be no issue getting George out of his Williams seat with power unit deals.
If Russell dominates this weekend. Would Merc consider ditching Hamilton?
Lewis is on 33m a season surley George would accept 3m?
30m worth of Car development a season added. Lewis hasn't signed for next year, be no issue getting George out of his Williams seat with power unit deals.
It was always changing though84-94 were locked out by McLaren and Williams.
It was always changing though
McLaren 84-85
Williams 86-87
McLaren 88-91
Williams 92-94
Also there was a lot more movement in the drivers market, so Senna, Prost, Mansell, Pique, Lauda, Berger, Patrese, Hill... all had opportunities to drive those cars at one point or another.
Not only has 2014-2021 been locked out by Mercedes, but there’s also almost no driver movement at the top. Merc have only had 3 drivers in this entire era: Hamilton, Rosberg and Bottas
It’s simply far easier for Hamilton to rack up ridiculous statistics than any driver of the past. The variety is lower, the competition is lower, dominance lasts longer, more race weekends than ever before, etc...
That’s why any kind of claim that Hamilton is “greater” than Senna or Prost or any other legend of the past is meaningless, in my view.
Mick P7 + fastest lap. Illot P6. Mick maintains a 14 point gap into the final race of the season, only a DNF or an incident can stop him becoming champion I think.
Mega effort from George that.
1 | Valtteri Bottas | Mercedes | fastest lap 0:53.904 | 0:53.803 | fastest lap 0:53.377 | |
2 | George Russell | Mercedes | 0:54.160 | 0:53.819 | 0:53.403 | |
3 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull | 0:54.037 | fastest lap 0:53.647 | 0:53.433 | |
4 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 0:54.249 | 0:53.825 | 0:53.613 | |
5 | Sergio Perez | Racing Point | 0:54.236 | 0:53.787 | 0:53.790 | |
6 | Daniil Kvyat | AlphaTauri | 0:54.346 | 0:53.856 | 0:53.906 | |
7 | Daniel Ricciardo | Renault | 0:54.388 | 0:53.871 | 0:53.957 | |
8 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | McLaren | 0:54.450 | 0:53.818 | 0:54.010 | |
9 | Pierre Gasly | AlphaTauri | 0:54.207 | 0:53.941 | 0:54.154 | |
10 | Lance Stroll | Racing Point | 0:54.595 | 0:53.840 | 0:54.200 | |
11 | Esteban Ocon | Renault | 0:54.309 | 0:53.995 | not available- | |
12 | Alexander Albon | Red Bull | 0:54.620 | 0:54.026 | not available- | |
13 | Sebastian Vettel | Ferrari | 0:54.301 | 0:54.175 | not available- | |
14 | Antonio Giovinazzi | Alfa Romeo | 0:54.523 | 0:54.377 | not available- | |
15 | Lando Norris | McLaren | 0:54.194 | 0:54.693 | not available- | |
16 | Kevin Magnussen | Haas | 0:54.705 | not available- | not available- | |
17 | Nicholas Latifi | Williams | 0:54.796 | not available- | not available- | |
18 | Jack Aitken | Williams | 0:54.892 | not available- | not available- | |
19 | Kimi Raikkonen | Alfa Romeo | 0:54.963 | not available- | not available- | |
20 | Pietro Fittipaldi | Haas | 0:55.426 | not available- | not available- |
There is plenty of strange posts about Lewis, all over social media, apparently Russell doing well , means that it all the car.Some weird posts on the last few pages regarding Hamilton.
Mega by Russell today, showing he’s clearly one of the best young drivers on the grid and has the talent to take a car to a championship winning season. Albon once again showing he’s not good enough.
They have a titanium skid block on the bottom of the car, its purely there to make sparks and look cool. It mainly happens at high speeds when downforce is at its highest so the car is squashed down, or over bumps.That sparking from some of the cars must cos some drag?
The Red Bulls defo fired out most sparks. Did look kinda cool, but not as good as the flame with the old turbosThey have a titanium skid block on the bottom of the car, its purely there to make sparks and look cool. It mainly happens at high speeds when downforce is at its highest so the car is squashed down, or over bumps.
There is plenty of strange posts about Lewis, all over social media, apparently Russell doing well , means that it all the car.
I have said Russell is a cracking driver for a while, in a winning car he has proved it, I did think Albon would do better.