Westminster Politics

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,406
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion

Beans

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
3,519
Location
Midwest, USA
Supports
Neutral
I'm imagining Truss and Kwasi "Wabbit" Kwarteng as Thelma and Louise, the cops are the bond and currency traders and bankers, trying to stop them from crashing the economy into the canyon.

"All this for us?"

Truss turns to Kwarteng, takes his hand and says, "Let's just keep going!"
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,588
Standard gaslighting from Truss this morning. I'm not sure her pretending the market reaction was because of the fuel bill freeze is going to work though.
 

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,688
Location
Australia
It's pretty fecking incredible that right wing governments have been in power for over a decade now but "the left" is still being blamed for the situation we're in.
Generations of "born to rule" ideology mixed with a press that is actively pro-tory or at best is so ideologically blind that they believe "keir starmer tanked the market in opposition" must be taken seriously to maintain "balance" :mad:

Completely fecked
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
The Tories have snookered themselves with ridiculous policy at ridiculous timing. But Truss is a stubborn, simple minded narcissist who doesn't want to U turn only one week into her premiership. It has feck all to do with Starmer.
Thats not really true though is it? With a left wing opposition they'd have said corporation tax should be increased to more than Sunak's 25%; leaving Truss a Get out of jail option to fall back on Sunak's 25%; whilst not being seen as anti business (the lesser of two evils)

Likewise a Corbynite would likely have been against the £1m AIA which could well have given wiggle room for Tories to reduce this back down to maybe a couple of hundred thousand to raise some cash.

A more socialist opposition would likely also be against the U-Turn on NI given that this was intended to fund social care which would be a priority for a left wing government who would favour higher taxes to allow higher spend.

Truss would also be able to attack a more left wing labour party who disagreed with Stamp Duty cuts in favour of social programs as an attack on first time buyers.

A socialist government would also have to explain what additional taxes they would levy to fund nationalising rail, energy, mail etc in an environment of expensive debt and wobbly confidence. Starmer has merely made a Johnsonite suggestion of a few billion for an energy quango.

A left wing party would also be vehemently against a points based immigration system (I agree with that by the way) and would have fallen into the trap of being able to be portrayed as a "low wage, high immigration" party.

Starmer has avoided all those traps by merely agreeing with the vast majority of tax decreases and agreeing with the vast majority of spending commitments.

He's basically marketing himself as to the right of Sunak economically (he agrees with £100b to cut corporation tax, income tax, NI and freeze energy prices), but a little to the left off Truss (he disagrees with £2b of higher rate cuts).

Throw in the odd populist Johnsonite focus-group approved policy like an(other) windfall tax and he's sorted.

Starmer is basically who the Tory Parliamentary Party would have voted for if it didn't go to the members.
 
Last edited:

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,507
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
They can't really U-turn given that Labour supports all of their policies with the exception of less than 2% of the budgetary commitment (the 45% rate abolishment).

In fairness to Starmer he's snookered them. He's been against all of their tax rises and has been pro the vast majority of their tax cuts. He's unicorned the Tories just as they did to Labour over Brexit.

The Tories know that if they U-Turn on any policy that would have a meaningful effect on restoring faith in UK debt markets (Corporation Tax, 19% IT cut, Energy support, reversal of NI rise), Labour would hammer them on stifling business/growth/investment or punishing normal people. The Tories also know that the 45% tax rate is inconsequential in the scheme of things, so U-Turning on this would have no discernable effect on the markets whilst also playing into the fact that they're running their economic policy straight out of the Labour HQ.

Starmer has completely Boris Johnson'd the Tories.

Don't get me wrong though... Once he's inevitably elected with the Eat Your Cake & Have It Too Johnsonite politics; he'll struggle because its fiscally illiterate. Starmer will face the same choices Truss currently faces in a world of expensive crises-related debt. Whack up taxes and repress growth to fund statism; reduce public spending whilst maintaining/reducing tax to propel growth; or a mixture of the two. Like Johnson he's rules out all three of course.
I've no idea what Labour's position is on the corporation tax hike being canned. Has Starmer commented on that? Didn't come up in the Kuenssberg interview on Sunday.

You are ignoring the proceeds of Labour's proposed windfall tax on energy companies, which would rake in tens of billions of pounds, but you know that.
 

Toblerone92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
929
Location
London
At what point do the adults step in and take the reins before these two genuinely bankrupt the country? This odious woman and her two-bit chancellor have a mandate of 0.3% of this country’s population.

The only good thing to come from this is it should keep the Tories out of power for a generation if cardboard cut-out Starmer can hold it together until the next GE.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,507
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
It's up there with the Mails, "Were risky pension trades behind chaos?" Definitely the marxist traders an their shady trades
Thought you were kidding til I googled it. Bollocks article with zero supportive quotes in it, even from crank right wing economists. At least the DM comment sections are saying 'this is bollocks', not all buying at least.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,440
Location
Tameside
Yes, my friend told me the locals use to call it the 'dustbin', (something to do with its shape?) He reckons there is some improvement with the new complex, but still thinks an awful lot of money was wasted.
It's the sort of historical anomaly Labour could do with avoiding.
True, but if it were seen as just one piece of a regeneration, I don't think it would be badly received. The timing meant that the masterplan for the town ended up getting curtailed.

Same can be said for Manchester City Council spending hundreds of millions renovating the victorian town Hall and Westminster likely to cost billions. On one hand it seems excessively wasteful, on the other hand the alternative is to let it go to ruin and spend on a new one having lost iconic historic buildings.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,920
Why does every Tory seem to think they show strong leadership by completely ignoring people’s concerns and doubling down on their shit ideas.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,807
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Why does every Tory seem to think they show strong leadership by completely ignoring people’s concerns and doubling down on their shit ideas.
Because while a GE is not yet on the horizon, it’s their peers which hold them accountable and to heir peers ignoring the people and being dogmatic with Tory ideals is a show of strength.
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,662
Why does every Tory seem to think they show strong leadership by completely ignoring people’s concerns and doubling down on their shit ideas.
Because they don't rule for your benefit. They are demonstrating strong leadership to their paymasters if they can inflict misery without losing power.
 

Fully Fledged

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
16,271
Location
Midlands UK
They can't really U-turn given that Labour supports all of their policies with the exception of less than 2% of the budgetary commitment (the 45% rate abolishment).

In fairness to Starmer he's snookered them. He's been against all of their tax rises and has been pro the vast majority of their tax cuts. He's unicorned the Tories just as they did to Labour over Brexit.

The Tories know that if they U-Turn on any policy that would have a meaningful effect on restoring faith in UK debt markets (Corporation Tax, 19% IT cut, Energy support, reversal of NI rise), Labour would hammer them on stifling business/growth/investment or punishing normal people. The Tories also know that the 45% tax rate is inconsequential in the scheme of things, so U-Turning on this would have no discernable effect on the markets whilst also playing into the fact that they're running their economic policy straight out of the Labour HQ.

Starmer has completely Boris Johnson'd the Tories.

Don't get me wrong though... Once he's inevitably elected with the Eat Your Cake & Have It Too Johnsonite politics; he'll struggle because its fiscally illiterate. Starmer will face the same choices Truss currently faces in a world of expensive crises-related debt. Whack up taxes and repress growth to fund statism; reduce public spending whilst maintaining/reducing tax to propel growth; or a mixture of the two. Like Johnson he's rules out all three of course.
You do realise that Labour are planning to pay for the price freeze on energy bills by imposing a windfall tax on the profiteering fuel companies? That alone would save considerably on borrowing.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,225
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Looking on social media, her local interviews aren't going too well:



Jesus fecking christ. I can genuinely feel myself losing brain cells listening to this.

Undoubtedly the stupidest PM I can ever remember. There are literally no redeeming features at all. You can see the cogs turning every time she has to answer a question outside of her proforma and she doesn't even have the mental agility to bluster like Johnson or Cameron did.

How depressing.
 

neverdie

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
2,411
the bbc running an explainer "what are bonds?" is very much 2008 vibes.

so the boe has spent >60bn propping up the market since friday? isn't that more than the proposed taxcuts? now take the devaluation of the currency into account and mortgage issues, lending rates, etc., and this might be the worst mistake in modern british political history outside of wars.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,544
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
Because while a GE is not yet on the horizon, it’s their peers which hold them accountable and to heir peers ignoring the people and being dogmatic with Tory ideals is a show of strength.
Yes exactly. It is all about trying to show that you are so unbelievably clever that you and only you know that you are absolutely right and everyone else is so unbelievably stupid that they cannot understand why.
And she and her CX are prepared to trash the UK economy and put millions of peoples pensions and savings and mortgages at risk simply to give a show of strength.

It is now up to the rest of the Tory MPs to make them change course. I have written to my useless Tory MP Chris Skidmore asking him why he thinks his leader should not change course.
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,662
:lol:

To be fair I've never seen her sweat and I've read rumors about her being dry.
 

Leg-End

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,576
The cameramen are laughing.

Are we definitely sure she hasn't quantum leaped from The Thick of It. She's an omnishambles.
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,982
Location
Occupied Merseyside
She's very drunk, she's at an open mic night, her friends have convinced her that she is hilarious and have encouraged her to have a go, and now they're giggling in the dark as she is standing on stage trying to remember a joke and is being heckled by half the audience.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,374
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
Those radio interviews are something else. She simply cannot come up with on the fly answer, when asked about something off script it's just radio silence.
 

CassiusClaymore

Is it Gaizka Mendieta?
Scout
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
35,940
Location
None of your business mate
Supports
The greatest team in history
Those radio interviews are something else. She simply cannot come up with on the fly answer, when asked about something off script it's just radio silence.
Yeah she's totally out of her depth. All she's got is that silly "I don't recognise that question" answer which basically means "Nobody has told me how to answer that one". Absolute cretin.