pseudo_canadian
Full Member
Whatever the deal I feel sorry for Arsenal fans.
Aand it's gone.
Whatever the deal I feel sorry for Arsenal fans.
Aand it's gone.
Agreed. I don't blame any of the players that have left Liverpool or Arsenal in the last 10 years.That's alright, but the other way round should also be accepted then, shouldn't it? Top players leaving a team in decline not where it used to be, without the fan vitriol. Players, like clubs, also must be ruthless, they have a short career and they want success.
Just going to have a nosey now muwahhahaHe must be getting some stick on twitter over this
You can't be serious. You think Arsenal will be better without Sanchez?Ox and Walcott weren't loses. They were sold and rightfully so. Most people (including you i presume) were clamouring for them to get rid of their mediocre players. Sanchez needs to go as he's a cancer on and off the pitch for the team. The only player I think they should pay crazy money to keep is Ozil. As good as Sanchez is, I think the Arsenal team would be better without him.
Because how dare he look out for his career and take time agreeing personal terms. He should accept whatever and please the impatient United fans!
Isn't that kind of implying it is a straight swap, but its not that the clubs think the players are at the same level. Sanchez' transfer fee is low because is contract is almost over and United are in a position to ask for more for Mikhi, if not from Arsenal, then elsewhere.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
His "local ladness" is just so misunderstoodSeen one of the papers claims Arsenal fancied loaning Welbeck to a club in Turkey this month but won't due to Sanchez leaving.
Poor wee Danny just can't catch a break. When will the world acknowledge his genius!!!
The situation at the club isn't that bad as everyone is making it out to be. I think one of the root causes of their problems on the pitch was Sanchez. The players didn't trust him and it was clear as day. Some players weren't passing to him (Ramsey for example), they hardly celebrated his goals with him and a lot of other players weren't happy with his antics in training either. Getting rid of him is better than keeping him around but I guess the perception of most players is that the team is regressing. They'd have to pay crazy wages get top players though.So wait,
This entire deal hinges on Mkhitaryan agreeing to terms with Arsenal? What the in hell? It's a no go then, who the hell wants to play for Arsenal lol.
Agree with this, except for the bolded part.I'm all for a deal involving Mkhi - especially for his own sake. But why the sudden blasting of him?
He's not behaving badly. He's remained professional through long stints on the bench/ in the stands. He doesn't show any signs of bad attitude.
He was a bad fit at United, that is all. I hope he does well at Arsenal or whereever he ends up, shame he couldn't recreate his form for Dortmund with us.
Mkhi + us subsidizing half of his wages, perhaps, if it's true that he's on 200k (ridiculous - we really couldn't attract him from a smaller club for less than tripling his former wages?).Right we shall see but I still don't believe Arsenal will just swap their best player for an out of form Mkhitaryan without any money also coming their way.
It will be money + Mkhitaryan for Sanchez mark my words.
we bought Mhki for £27m and that was considered a cheap deal as he didn't have long left on his contract. Sigurdsson went for £50m, Arnautović for £25m. Mhki has shown glimpses of being a quality player, and is a better player than both of them.He's not. But if you truly believe that, I'll accept it as a difference in opinion and leave it at that.
Hmm.As good as Sanchez is, I think the Arsenal team would be better without him.
Dublin's finest.I put Sky Sports News on, to see if they were running with this nonsense on air and all I'll say is, this Rachel Wyse presenter is out of this world. Sign her up.
Yeah I don't think anyone who agrees a straight swap is fair, thinks Miki is the same value on the pitch as Sanchez (based off recent history anyway).Isn't that kind of implying it is a straight swap, but its not that the clubs think the players are at the same level. Sanchez' transfer fee is low because is contract is almost over and United are in a position to ask for more for Mikhi, if not from Arsenal, then elsewhere.
So basically a straight swap.
In this market replacing those players will not be easy.Getting almost 60m for both Walcott and Ox is good business in my opinion.
Yes, that's true. But, we got Miki for £26m when he had only 1 year left on his contract (if he had 2+ years left, he'd have cost closer to £50m given the season he had just had at Dortmund). Miki also started the season in incredible form, but his level dropped and he's been out of the squad in recent months, but clearly there's a very good player there. Sanchez is obviously a top 5 player in the league, but he hasn't hit the heights of last season these past few months, so there is a risk that he won't perform at that level in a new team.Its not that easy:
1) Sanchez is desired by all the topclubs in the Uk - Mkhitaryan isn't anymore
2) Sanchez has shown that he can play in the P.L - Mkhitaryan has only shown short glimpses
So I think we are lucky if we get a straight swap - I would not complain if we had to pay £15-20 million
we're only getting Sanchez so cheap because of his contract. otherwise he would be worth at least twice the amount we're paying. of course Sanchez is the better player, but he's leaving for free in 6 months.You have to consider the current form of both players and what they have achieved in the Prem to date, Sanchez is streets ahead in both departments
We're getting a Prem proven world class footballer, Arsenal are getting a potentially world class player. I'm surprised it's a straight swap.
Arsenal haven't any other player other than Ozil that would make our squad I feel.Chelsea and Arsenal are United's official feeder club, shall we make a move for City's best player?
We got Micky for 26 mil though after his best season and he's clearly regressed since then.we were going to offer £35m for Sanchez.
Mhki is worth £35m. Arsenal clearly like him. what's daft about it? they effectively get Mhki on a long term deal for free, instead of having a sulking Sanchez leave in the summer.
Hmmm, who else does this guy have on his books?http://www.skysports.com/football/n...s-on-henrikh-mkhitaryan-agreeing-arsenal-deal
"The agent, who counts Paul Pogba, Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Romelu Lukaku among his clients, says he proposed the 'Sanchez to Old Trafford, Mkhitaryan to Arsenal' deal more than six weeks ago."
I'm hardly talking about that. They've lost games with him playing so I'm not sure what you're getting at. I'm talking about the dynamics between him and his other teammates. It's no secret that most of the squad wants him gone.Hmm.
Bournemouth 2 - 1 Arsenal. This suggests otherwise.
Straight swap, de Bruyne for Fellaini. Well, if you don't ask you don't get.Chelsea and Arsenal are United's official feeder club, shall we make a move for City's best player?
TESTIFY!Because how dare he look out for his career and take time agreeing personal terms. He should accept whatever and please the impatient United fans!
I think some are criminally underrating Miki and understating Sanchez's contract situation.we're only getting Sanchez so cheap because of his contract. otherwise he would be worth at least twice the amount we're paying. of course Sanchez is the better player, but he's leaving for free in 6 months.
I know you're having a joke but even still it seems Aubameyang is going to join them. I wonder why a player of his quality is willing to do so in the current environment? I guess it's still a step up from Dortmund right now particularly due to being side-lined right now as result of apparent behavioural issues. That being said you'd think he might have some other offers to consider.So wait,
This entire deal hinges on Mkhitaryan agreeing to terms with Arsenal? What the in hell? It's a no go then, who the hell wants to play for Arsenal lol.
Yeah but I think he was trying to say how Arsenal aren't hard done by in this scenario. They exchange a player who they won't own for much longer with one who they can sign for 4 years, and might be very effective for them.Isn't that kind of implying it is a straight swap, but its not that the clubs think the players are at the same level. Sanchez' transfer fee is low because is contract is almost over and United are in a position to ask for more for Mikhi, if not from Arsenal, then elsewhere.
So basically a straight swap.
we got him cheap because he didn't have long left on his contract with Dortmund, IIRC.We got Micky for 26 mil though after his best season and he's clearly regressed since then.
He had 12 months on contract and BVB wanted to get cash while they could. Someone from the club said as much.We got Micky for 26 mil though after his best season and he's clearly regressed since then.
Some truth in that, but we'd be getting the better end of a swap, no question. Contract situation taken into account, it would be a great piece of business.I think some are criminally underrating Miki and understating Sanchez's contract situation.
I hope he does well at Arsenal, that doesn't mean i hope Arsenal does well. 10 goals and 10 assists for Mkhi, while Arsenal grab the last EL-spotAgree with this, except for the bolded part.
As not-good as Mkhitaryan has been for us, he's been a professional.
Can't help recalling that interview in the summer was it, where Jose was asked about Morata and 'mistakenly' named Sanchez.If Raiola said he suggested this 6 weeks ago, I’m sure thsi deal has been going on for a while. This will be sorted soon. Especially as Mkhi wouldn’t be against the idea of joining Arsenal.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date