bosnian_red
Worst scout to ever exist
They should have made the 2 deals separate but effectively together like rooney/lukaku to ease the worries of the fans. What were they thinking
Old news! Sky suck.
That's totally fair.Sky now saying it's going to be a straight swap and no cash involved. What a deal that would be.
He really isn't going to get a better offer than Arsenal based on what he's done with us overall. Dortmund is the only other place I'd say he could go that wouldn't be a massive step down.Mickhi shouldn't be abused cause he's honoring his contract and doesn't want to move to a club he doesn't want to go to.
That would be incredible muppet juices are definitely flowing, I've been strapped in and believing in this since Thursday Woody you are the Man! And Di MarzioSky now saying it's going to be a straight swap and no cash involved. What a deal that would be.
so we are getting Mihki at ~50 mil €/ 44 mil pound providing Mihki is valued at 25€.Tweet is saying we are paying money on top of Mkhitaryan to get Sanchez. This is what has always been the narrative of this deal. So I'am a bit confused about your statement.
Looks like Arsenal aren't letting us do that, because they're idiots. Take the £35m and get a better player than Mkhi.Why dont we just pay cash for Sanchez and get rid of Mkhi in the summer?
because that's only in our interest. Arsenal have made it clear that they want a replacement in place before letting him go, if only to appease the fanbase. Whether that's Miki or Auba. If Auba gets done then i'm sure they'll let Sanchez go for cash. But they wont risk getting nothing by the end of the transfer window. and why should theyThey should have made the 2 deals separate but effectively together like rooney/lukaku to ease the worries of the fans. What were they thinking
And Sanchez scoring 5 with us winning 5-3. I would take that.Mickhi scoring a hattrick at OT. It's written.
Link?!Sky now saying it's going to be a straight swap and no cash involved. What a deal that would be.
I think Dortmund have already said that the transfer fee is too high.Basically there or Dortmund. Probably better money at Arsenal but I don’t see many other decent teams looking at him.
This is what has mystified me all along. Then again, classic Arsenal!Looks like Arsenal aren't letting us do that, because they're idiots. Take the £35m and get a better player than Mkhi.
And everybody happy.And Sanchez scoring 5 with us winning 5-3. I would take that.
Mkhitaryan has had his chance, he has disappointed. He gets a very nice opportunity to start over at Arsenal, if he is smart he will take that chance.Why?
It's not on him to see that this transfer goes through, he might simply not want to move to Arsenal, and when we signed a contract we made the same commitment he did.
Are we not better than that?
Might be a bit of a stupid question but what does 15/25 mean?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Now the deal looks sensible. Didn't want mkhi to go for nothing.
http://www.skysports.com/transfer-centreLink?!
There's Riaola quotes on Mkhi being part of the deal, but only a standard "Sky Sports Understands" about there not being a fee...SANCHEZ/MKHI WOULD BE STRAIGHT SWAP
Alexis Sanchez’s move to Manchester United depends on Henrikh Mkhitaryan agreeing terms with Arsenal.
That’s according to the Armenian international’s agent Mino Raiola who has told Sky Sports News that “Sanchez is part of Mkhi’s deal. Not the other way around. Without him, Sanchez simply cannot go to United.”
Vitally, it’s understood that if agreement can be reached, the deal will be a straight player swap and will not include any fee for Sanchez.
Mate, we are a football club. We are just like every other club in the World, only a bit richer.Why?
It's not on him to see that this transfer goes through, he might simply not want to move to Arsenal, and when we signed a contract we made the same commitment he did.
Are we not better than that?
These media outlets are absolutely shameless how they will just change their tune at the drop of a hat. They need to be called out on this shit.Sky now saying it's going to be a straight swap and no cash involved. What a deal that would be.
Not me.If he doesn't and if the transfer of Sanchez falls through because of that than his story at this club will have been one of failure and misery and fans will blame him for missing out on Sanchez which might not be fair but it will happen anyway.
Million euro.Might be a bit of a stupid question but what does 15/25 mean?
Yes except that we are getting Sanchez and not Mihkiso we are getting Mihki at ~50 mil €/ 44 mil pound providing Mihki is valued at 25€.
Wow. Woody is a legend.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That would make sense tbf. Miki in this market is easily worth £30m.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That seems very odd.Looks like Arsenal aren't letting us do that, because they're idiots. Take the £35m and get a better player than Mkhi.
There's talent in there somewhere for sure, don’t know what it is about him though that he rarely performs for us.Ridiculous if we pull that off. Mkhitaryan is shite.
Miki is not going to score 3 goals anytime soon. Let alone in a single game.Mickhi scoring a hattrick at OT. It's written.
He could play wide left/right or behind Lukaku. I'd be inclined to start him wide right and see how it goes. That position is the one we desperately need to sort.Where's he going to play? The way they were talking last night on MNF was as if Martial would make way for him but surely he's gonna come in on the right.
Especially when they could use that money far more effectively than having Mhkitaryan. This is a great deal for us this way though, no transfer fee being paid and getting rid of deadwood.That seems very odd.