My point was how you lack any sort of objectivity in this thread. I probably have more posts (in here) but at least I can say when he's played well or played shit (or how I have perceived, anyway). With you, it's staunch defence of him no matter how he plays. Then, if you are to even mildly critique him, you will do so by blaming others.
I probably have 'favourites' in the best sense of the word, but I certainly won't get as blinded by them and refuse to criticise them like some do with their 'favourites'. Fellaini and Lingard get harshly criticised at times, for sure, but so do most. The thing with Fellaini and Lingard especially, is that people make things up and say they have played well when they clearly haven't. That's the kind of blind, staunch defence that I'm talking about.
Chill out bro, I don't care if you don't want to appease me, I wouldn't want you to. You quoted me first after all
I'm sure you're a good poster and all...