Tony247
Full Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Messages
- 9,526
So talking about money tick them off! This is nice to know. Ole should say something about it in his next presser.
Richard Keys just said Guardiola has spent £1.4bn at City.
I've just worked it out and he has actually spent £850m.
Almost doubled the real figure.
Since when has Keys been governed by facts. Complete charlatan - stealing a living…. Can’t even decide which team to support.
“Generational”Paying £100m for him and then expecting Spurs to move at south of £160m is the nuttiest bit.
One was top scorer and assist provider last year. One won the most free kicks. I love Grealish but Kane is was always worth £50-100m more than him.
Probably this guy:which cnut was this @Damien ?
"
I'v been banned on redcafe.... For saying "City dont cheat and their is no proof" twice. It was too much for them and that's it banned.
feck me they're hurting from City pain "
Wow the bitterness. Guys this is another non - starter. Another trolling by the media rehashing the same old stuff.
There's a reason non of this ends up in fines or bans or main media, and that's because it is clickbait designed to get lfc and utd fans excited and clicking.
You guys carry on though, like the CAS thread I'll come back and say told you so. But for now let the accusations and misinformation fly.
City's argument being they don't want the press taking part. What's wrong with that?
You saying how senior the judge is doesn't make it more guilty.
Like I said, it's a rehash of old news and nothing will happen. It never does. Because there is nothing to answer for when it comes to actual law instead of newspaper accusations based on hatred for city.
You guys get your hopes up, but City run a clean ship, they have to, they're up against the history clubs and their media.
They just can’t stand hearing about their spending. It will soon be a decade since their first title and everybody knows all of their success has been inorganic.
They are simply an ugly girl with a plastic surger and they KNOW it.
I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.“Generational”
“better than Bruno”
“We will regret this for years to come”
He’s just another classy midfielder in a squad that’s already packed with them. I’d argue Mahrez was a far more complete and dangerous attacking player when City got him. Moving Bernardo on for Grealish is a 5-10% improvement at carrying the ball forward and drawing fowls and that’s it. 100 million upgrade? Not by any stretch. It’s just Gods way of telling you that you have too much money. Delighted, he’ll take the scrutiny off Sancho this season now big time.
Thats why they are so bitter towards us. They know they won the lottery, they know the owners could of picked Newcastle, Spurs, Sunderland, whoever, and the sucess would of been the same. It may of took longer, or less time, but their success is all built on the fact that it was City the owners picked, and nothing more.They just can’t stand hearing about their spending. It will soon be a decade since their first title and everybody knows all of their success has been inorganic.
City is simply an ugly girl with a plastic surger and they KNOW it.
I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.
It just seems daft to announce a £100m purchase before you agree a fee for Kane though. Especially as the pair are not miles apart in age. In the last 3 years Kane has played in a CL final, won the golden boot at the World Cup, captained his country to a Euros final after finishing top of goals and assists charts IN THE SAME LEAGUE as the club that wants him.
Why do Spurs look at all of that and think the number should be closer to £100 than £200?
United should bid £160m just to ensure City have to pay it. New rich Cnuts living up to the ‘knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing’ line. Plastic twats.
Didn't expect them to be watching our game. Varane presentation probably killed them on the inside, completely dwarfs anything they've doneNever thought I'd see this thread up so soon
We don’t have to bid. We just have to enquire about him and tell them how much were willing to pay. Thankfully. As I’d rather Haaland next season.I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.
It just seems daft to announce a £100m purchase before you agree a fee for Kane though. Especially as the pair are not miles apart in age. In the last 3 years Kane has played in a CL final, won the golden boot at the World Cup, captained his country to a Euros final after finishing top of goals and assists charts IN THE SAME LEAGUE as the club that wants him.
Why do Spurs look at all of that and think the number should be closer to £100 than £200?
United should bid £160m just to ensure City have to pay it. New rich Cnuts living up to the ‘knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing’ line. Plastic twats.
I agree, even though that's the last thing they should be concentrating on! Anyway, a nice end to the weekend for usDidn't expect them to be watching our game. Varane presentation probably killed them on the inside, completely dwarfs anything they've done
Ah I was looking for a post you had reacted to here in the thread.Some birtie said they were banned from the caf.
I don't know how we are expected to compete this year when the Rags have a nett spend of over £110 million while so far we have only been able to spend a nett £40 million
What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?Moving Bernardo on for Grealish is a 5-10% improvement at carrying the ball forward and drawing fowls and that’s it.
Talk about a grouse exaggeration!What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
Don't worry pal, your net spend will be 190Mil soon enough.I don't know how we are expected to compete this year when the Rags have a nett spend of over £110 million while so far we have only been able to spend a nett £40 million
Maybe do that in a thread about City, not BluemoonI have two questions about City
Having that squad, who do you go for in transfer market?
At which point you just buy players so that others can't get them?
Ask Bayern Munich, I guess, they've been playing that game for years.I have two questions about City
Having that squad, who do you go for in transfer market?
At which point you just buy players so that others can't get them?
That last bit is on the nose. It looks nice but it's fake so people just don't like it as much.They just can’t stand hearing about their spending. It will soon be a decade since their first title and everybody knows all of their success has been inorganic.
City is simply an ugly girl with a plastic surger and they KNOW it.
Pep kinda reminds me of Wenger (far better obviously) in that he can never have enough of those classy midfielders even when other areas are bigger issues.He’s just another classy midfielder in a squad that’s already packed with them. I’d argue Mahrez was a far more complete and dangerous attacking player when City got him. Moving Bernardo on for Grealish is a 5-10% improvement at carrying the ball forward and drawing fowls and that’s it. 100 million upgrade? Not by any stretch.
They're an unpheasant bunch. Always grousing.What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
Probably Alex Crook, he's a wanker basically. Laugh now but he spent most of last season laying into OleWas anyone listening to talksport 25 minutes back? A Man City fan was interrupted by the presenter who told them “this isn’t a fairytale, you aren’t Leceister, you are an Oil club financed by a state, there’s no fairytale, it isn’t real”
I'm sure they'll take better care of their grammar and spelling from heron in.What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
The point about grealish trying to stay in his feet and beat the man is valid really. Other than that, they're batshit........
.........
Can we stop parroting on about grammar please?I'm sure they'll take better care of their grammar and spelling from heron in.
How rude. Well I hope you have a pheasant evening good sir.Can we stop parroting on about grammar please?
Most talksport presenters just try and wind up the people who call in. If they're not ranting, the presenter will argue with them and try to get them to rant. If they're calling up to rant, the presenter will just egg them on. If they're calling up to argue, the presenter will mock them.Probably Alex Crook, he's a wanker basically. Laugh now but he spent most of last season laying into Ole
Sounds like a primary school argument. Only difference is that you could still like the kidsMost talksport presenters just try and wind up the people who call in. If they're not ranting, the presenter will argue with them and try to get them to rant. If they're calling up to rant, the presenter will just egg them on. If they're calling up to argue, the presenter will mock them.