Anybody that supports a Jim bid that keeps the Glazers around in ANY capacity is a utter cvnt .. don’t like Qatar? Fair enough and I admire your stoicism in rejecting it but the only reason I want Qatar to win is not a shiny new toy every window but the fact that the fvcking pond life are finally out of our club..if Jim had announced he would be taking full control and the twats would be history then he would 100% be my choice, but he’s not so fvck him and fvck the Glazers
A bit disingenuous. Of course you want whoever takes over to succeed. 'Anyone but the Glazers' means you want a consortium of Peter Ridsdale, Peter Johnson, Mike Ashley and Peter Swales to take over. Way too many Peters, there.
If de Brun is correct, Ineos do not want the Glazers to have any say into how the club is run. No voting shares. Nothing. Take your cash and do one. The caveat is they'll still enrich themselves, but no matter the outcome, this is going to happen.
Qatar winning will see Woodward pocket a cool 14 million alone.
Furthermore, and I know this isn't as exciting as a tight PL run-in and 'owning the scousers', but Qatar will use United as PR for their repressive, autocratic regime. Human rights matter.
Mind, I don't want Ratcliffe to take over at all, I think he is a devious, unscrupulous liar, but he is up against a state bid, so I'd expect no holds barred.