Victor Lindelof image 2

Victor Lindelof Sweden flag

2017-18 Performances


View full 2017-18 profile

5.8 Season Average Rating
Appearances
29
Clean sheets
13
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did Mourinho really meant he will play Lindelöf in midfield, like he said in the post-game press conference? The reason being he's the best with the ball from the back against teams that sit back… Or was it a mistake, and he was just emphasizing using him the Premier League?

I think Jose said him pushing from CB to midfield position, not starting as Midfielder. He was talking about defensive teams, how teams play with 3 CBs and one more defensive block, so Lindelof can attack that midfield space as he is good passer of the ball from deep.
 
Looked quality on the ball last night, rash challenge in the box though that probably should have been a penalty. Need to see him tested more aerially. Great competition for CBs with him, Jones, Smalling, Bailly and Rojo.

Bailly is probably first choice and the stand out player of them, then you have Jones who will have 3-4 class games then make a big error, Smalling who is a great defender, very quick, good in the tackle and excellent in the air but who's passing is dreadful, Rojo who was terrific last year but is rash and can get sent off easily and Lindelof who's new to the club and highly rated.
 
I think it was a very good debut, he said. To play my first match at Old Trafford is something I have really waited for. It felt really good.
I played my own game and did what I was told to do on the pitch. Now I’m going to watch the replay to see if there’s anything that I could have done better.
I feel pretty confident and know what I’m able to do. That’s what I was trying to do on the pitch.

Just wow!:eek:
 
I think it was a very good debut, he said. To play my first match at Old Trafford is something I have really waited for. It felt really good.
I played my own game and did what I was told to do on the pitch. Now I’m going to watch the replay to see if there’s anything that I could have done better.
I feel pretty confident and know what I’m able to do. That’s what I was trying to do on the pitch.

Just wow!:eek:
He'll be just fine. Great attitude.
 
You could see his passing ability is there but he still looks like he's lacking confidence and when he was being pressed he didn't look comfortable. I think he looked better yesterday than in pre-season so I think some progress is being made. I think he should start in our next LC cup game.
 
I thought he was decent. Not expecting him to acclimatise as quickly as Bailly did (though nobody expected that of Bailly either).

I can see him being amaze-balls in a 3-5-2 should we ever play that.
It seems like that's what Jose had in mind, especially with Perisic as the LWB. Guess we will see in the future.
 
You could see his passing ability is there but he still looks like he's lacking confidence and when he was being pressed he didn't look comfortable. I think he looked better yesterday than in pre-season so I think some progress is being made. I think he should start in our next LC cup game.
It would perhaps make sense, away against his former teammates.
 
You could see his passing ability is there but he still looks like he's lacking confidence and when he was being pressed he didn't look comfortable. I think he looked better yesterday than in pre-season so I think some progress is being made. I think he should start in our next LC cup game.

Agree with this. Baby steps. He's still got a long way to go but I'm starting to see what the manager saw in him.
 
Interestingly, he looks like a perfect long term replacement for Carrick at CDM.
 
I was very impressed with his passing yesterday.
Of course the referee would have been wrong to award Basel a penalty when he made that slide tackle in the box, but it was a bit rash a could have been costly on another day.

It also annoys me that even Danish commentators are latching on to this narrative that he's not good enough already.
 
He looks a bit like DDG when he first joined us, you can see the potential but he's quite shy and timid in his performances.

One he settles into the team and feels like he belongs, we will see the real ability IMO. He just needs time to adjust, it was a good game to give him.
 
I think Jose said him pushing from CB to midfield position, not starting as Midfielder. He was talking about defensive teams, how teams play with 3 CBs and one more defensive block, so Lindelof can attack that midfield space as he is good passer of the ball from deep.

This, that is also mine interpretation.
 
I like the squad that we're putting together. Each of our centre backs is, or will soon be a viable starter, each is utterly different from the next. We've that sort of variety right through the squad. None of our rivals have this level of variety.
 
His passing and on the ball skills are very good for a CB but his aerial prowess is very average at the moment. Didnt look like any nervousness with the ball at all. Few nice accurate long forward passes as well too. Would be a great skill to have in the team soon.
 
Passing is impressive, showed nice range and vision. The defensive side is the concern. He looks a little on the weak side to me, a little of Johnny Evans about him in that I fear he could be bullied by some of the PL forwards. Some defenders can make up for a slighter build with aggression, not only in terms of physical challenges, but in how quickly they close the attacker down and pressure them. Lindelof tends to stand off, so weakness and passivity is not a good combination anywhere for a CB, let alone the PL. Hopefully some time on the weights and confidence can help those issues.
 
Yes but he looked shaky on the ball according to some

I think fans sometimes pay too much attention to what commentators say rather than trusting the evidence of their own eyes. Last night, for instance, Hargreaves spent the entire game drooling over Mkhitaryan, in a performance which more objective watchers saw as mediocre at best.
 
But the fact that exceptions to the rule exists(even if the rule is true) means that future exceptions are possible.

Uhm, yes? I have never stated otherwise. The historical track record was merely a reference, as you may know, history teaches us a thing or two in this world, including football. That hasn't stopped you from blowing it out of proportions since then. I haven't discussed or questioned talents, only the systems which they evolve or not evolve in.

There has and always will be exceptions because of good talent. Victor won't be that exception though, not as a centre-back, not at this level. Don't take it so personal, he's just another professional footballer.

He spent most of his years in Armenia or around that area just like how Lindleof I assume spent most of his years in Sweeden before signining in Portugal. By your reasoning, who is to say that Lindleof's years in Portugal weren't beneficial?

A big reason Lindelof is at United now is because of his years in Portugal, brought there by his talent, which later was developed, educated and nurtured for this level, mainly in Portugal, in a way that wouldn't have happened in Sweden nowadays. Lindelof arrived at Benfica's youth system in his later teenage years at 18, whilst I believe the optimal age for those type of big moves is around 14–16 years of age, especially if you have that big talent which he supposedly has.

Perhaps it's irrelevant in Lindelof's case, as he used his time at Benfica well. However, I don't think it'll be enough anyway, as I don't believe his talent and abilities will be consistent and good enough for a club like United. And rest assured that it's very improbable he even would have gotten this far, had he not left Sweden for Portugal. What are you still trying to argue on that point.

Natural talent can't be taught. If you have natural talent and have the hard work to take that talent to the next level, anything is possible.

Talented enough for Benfica, but won't be enough for this level, as I've stated in my original post.

I admit my mistake with Auba, but Mkhitaryan was born and raised in Armenia and brought up through that system.
What about Christian Eriksen? Last great Danish midfielder that came up through the Danish system(if my memory serves correct) was Michael Laudrup?
What about Eric Baily? Until he 17 he grew up in Ivory Coast who arn't known for producing elite center backs?
Sadio Mane? Started his career in the Senegalese football academy
Chicharito Hernandez(prime)? Started out in Mexico before coming to United
Christian Pulisic? One of the biggest talentes in the world right now at the age of 18 yet spent most of his years developing in US(where I can account that the academies are trash compared to the worlds best)

Yes, what about them? Also exceptions.

Further down the road, perhaps all those nations' footballing systems will develop talents at a more consistent level. Because, as of now, there is a reason you leave Gabon, Armenia, Denmark, Senegal, Mexico and USA in your early/mid teenage years to take the next step, because the systems in place won't give you the platform to do so.

Take a look at Croatia and Belgium as two fine examples of the contrary. So many top-level players that have emerged from their systems in recent years with levels of progress in their youth systems maintained. And they're not exactly large nations by population either. Croatia is at slightly over ~4 million, and whilst Belgium has more than double that, their ~11 million isn't exactly a gigantic leap from Sweden's recently reached ~10 million, for example. Croatia and Belgium demonstrating that you can produce top-level players, consistently, with a good system, no matter the quantity. Not exactly as if all those 4, 11 and 10 million respectively are all options to be professional footballers either. So there's an even less smaller pool of players than that to choose from and develop. But maybe Croatia and Belgium are just too impressive to use as examples. It's still very admirable work though.

As I said before, if you are good, you are good. The fact that Lindleof is here right now at the age of 22 and was scouted by and rivaled for by many teams proves that he has natural talent. What he did on the pitch got himself here, not his past. So as I said, to suggest that his past is going to determine what he can do in the future rather than what he is doing right now is stupid.

Apart from his talent, his footballing background and education has contributed to him being the footballer that he is today, just as your past experiences and life events have done the same with you as the person you are today.

I haven't said that it dictates future though. That's down to individual qualities and development from here on out. And for Lindelof, I don't think it will be enough. I repeat: not as a centre-back, not at this level. I hope he proves me wrong though. His performance against Basel showed me nothing that I haven't seen from him before, good or bad. It's same ole Victor.

Also, "scouted by and rivaled for by many teams"… yet it appeared that United was the only club that had genuine, concrete interest in Lindelof. I don't think we would've even signed him if it wasn't for Rojo's long term injury. Rojo, who's good form also coincided with our interest in Lindelof cooling down during the winter transfer window.
 
I don't understand how I strawmanned your argument. From your post you asked when a sweedish center back belonged at one of the top clubs? then you said that Lindleof's football education and his values are rooted in the Sweedish education system which has fallen behind. So from both of your points it is implied that because he came from a poor football education and that no one else recently who came up from Sweeden has actually done welll at a big club, Lindleof is likely not going to succeed here, yes? So let me pose this question for you: Why was he brought here under a manger known for cultivating center backs? Why was he such a widely scouted player? Why was he named to the Champions League Breakthrough XI? Its talent. He is a talented player with bags of potential, so as far as I'm concerned, his past dosen't mean jack all to me.

Imagine that I'm with a bunch of scouts watching him play against Bayern:

Scout 1: I love how comfortable he is on the ball and how he is not afraid to drive it forward.

Scout 2: Agreed, quite the passer as well.

Scout 3: Seems to have very advanced positioning for his age, hasn't put a foot wrong so far

Me: See the thing is, he was brought up in Sweeden who arn't really good at developing center backs nowadays. I don't think he will do well at a top club.

Scout 1: Are you watching the gam--

Me: IRRELEVANT. I don't want his poor values infecting the players.

See how crazy that sounds?

Stupid post.
 
There has and always will be exceptions because of good talent. Victor won't be that exception though, not as a centre-back, not at this level. Don't take it so personal, he's just another professional footballer.
And you are basing this off of what? He showed great potential in his Benfica days and was one of their best players. Shouldn't we wait until he gets a run of games before rushing to such judgement?
A big reason Lindelof is at United now is because of his years in Portugal, brought there by his talent, which later was developed, educated and nurtured for this level, mainly in Portugal, in a way that wouldn't have happened in Sweden nowadays. Lindelof arrived at Benfica's youth system in his later teenage years at 18, whilst I believe the optimal age for those type of big moves is around 14–16 years of age, especially if you have that big talent which he supposedly has.

You stated previously that Miki's time in Brazil played a major part of his development which in turn allowed him to grow into being a borderline elite player. You also just stated now that Lindlof's time in Portugal was very important for his development. So what is to stop Victor from being like Miki?

Furthermore when you move is irrelevant to a bigger club is irrelevant. Some people demonstrate the talent earlier than others but that dosen't change the fact that someone is talented.
Apart from his talent, his footballing background and education has contributed to him being the footballer that he is today, just as your past experiences and life events have done the same with you as the person you are today.

Yet look at him now, a young prospect at one of the biggest clubs in the world. So you are in effect conceding that Sweden's football program isn't as bad as you make it or that there is a double standard in your argument...
 
Also, "scouted by and rivaled for by many teams"… yet it appeared that United was the only club that had genuine, concrete interest in Lindelof. I don't think we would've even signed him if it wasn't for Rojo's long term injury. Rojo, who's good form also coincided with our interest in Lindelof cooling down during the winter transfer window
Try again. We were scouting Lindleof long before Rojo's injury and Mourinho recognizes his tactical importance.
But the nature of the Premier League is also changing and we need defenders who can play, who can come into the midfield bringing the ball because it's becoming really defensive and we're going to face many teams with five in the back and two or three in front.

"Victor of all our defenders is probably the one to bring more quality when he attacks the midfield."
 
And you are basing this off of what? He showed great potential in his Benfica days and was one of their best players. Shouldn't we wait until he gets a run of games before rushing to such judgement?

His matches for Sweden U21, Sweden national team and his matches in the Champions League last season. He's hyped up beyond his capabilities for reasons that are beyond me. His talent isn't enough to negate his other deficiencies, such as his lack of pace, his poor positioning, his lack of aerial ability despite measuring in at 187 cm tall, his nervousness, his clumsiness when challenging. It all leads me to believe he won't make it at this level, not as a centre-back. Some of that is in my original post too, which you clearly still haven't understood.

You stated previously that Miki's time in Brazil played a major part of his development which in turn allowed him to grow into being a borderline elite player. You also just stated now that Lindlof's time in Portugal was very important for his development. So what is to stop Victor from being like Miki?

Uhm, individual talent and capabilities?

Furthermore when you move is irrelevant to a bigger club is irrelevant. Some people demonstrate the talent earlier than others but that dosen't change the fact that someone is talented.

I don't understand this part. Re-phrase and at least put some effort in your spelling and sentences, been a few times now that you've been unclear. Sort it out if you're going to waste both of our times on this further.

Are you saying it's irrelevant when you leave for a bigger club? Are you serious? A year or two is perhaps not so relevant in life if you're 25, 30 or 35. If you've existed for only 18 years in total though… a year or two makes a major difference. I stand firm on that point, 14–16, perhaps even a year younger, is the absolute optimal time to put in that extra-gear of a young player's development. For a number of reasons, puberty being one of them. This is the short time of window which can basically help set (not by itself, along with genetics, naturally) your physical conditions for the rest of your life.

Yet look at him now, a young prospect at one of the biggest clubs in the world. So you are in effect conceding that Sweden's football program isn't as bad as you make it or that there is a double standard in your argument...


There is no double standard in my argument, only your lack of understanding and your difficulties in comprehending sentences. I never said that Sweden's football system is bad. My original post regarding Sweden's track record touched on the subject of world class centre-backs that emerge from the system in place. Which you've also blown completely out of proportions, evident in your first reply where you ask about nationality and then later go on to talking about offensive yada yada yada…
 
Last edited:
Try again. We were scouting Lindleof long before Rojo's injury and Mourinho recognizes his tactical importance.

I didn't state otherwise. And when Rojo upped his game, we dropped it. Seriously, read…
 
Last edited:
He definitely has to toughen up. The Ricardo Carvalho comparison makes total sense.
 
Is there really that much difference between LCB and RCB
Enough for Mourinho to notice it and say, for instance, that he was forced to play two left footed centerbacks at the same time last season once.
 
Think he will struggle in a two man defence ever so slightly but in a 3 man defence he can initiate the counter attacks from deep.
 
Enough for Mourinho to notice it and say, for instance, that he was forced to play two left footed centerbacks at the same time last season once.
Yeh but Rojo aside all our CBs are right footed.. Including Jones.... If Lindelof is as great a passer as he's claimed to be I'm sure he can play either side.
 
Yeh but Rojo aside all our CBs are right footed.. Including Jones.... If Lindelof is as great a passer as he's claimed to be I'm sure he can play either side.
Yeah, but like the wide-forwards who are right footed tend to be used by Mourinho on the left, it is not the same to start with the right foot from the left of the defense, where you're facing a packed midfield in front of you, and from the right, where you have the right wing opening.
 
Is there really that much difference between LCB and RCB

I think so. When you get the ball under pressure it's usually better to take your first touch out wide for a pass/clearance and it's easier to do that on your stronger foot. It makes a difference at the level i play at and granted it's way below PL standard but then I don't have Sergio Aguero closing me down either.
 
Think he will struggle in a two man defence ever so slightly but in a 3 man defence he can initiate the counter attacks from deep.

Yup, in the middle of a three-man defence is the setup that gives him the best chances of succeeding as a centre-back, as he'll basically be a defensive/holding midfielder in possession. Otherwise, I personally believe he can do better as a "real" defensive/holding midfielder in a midfield three, than he would as a centre-back.
 
Yup, in the middle of a three-man defence is the setup that gives him the best chances of succeeding as a centre-back, as he'll basically be a defensive/holding midfielder in possession. Otherwise, I personally believe he can do better as a "real" defensive/holding midfielder in a midfield three, than he would as a centre-back.

Yeh il be honest and haven't seen him much - but I reckon he was bought as an alternative to eric dier. Our football is really good now to try change things but I do reckon our real abilities as a team will show once we settle back in tp the 352
 
Status
Not open for further replies.