22
Perfect Klopp player, he would look a lot better playing for Liverpool because they ignore everything else apart from going forward, so he would be able to ignore actually playing football like the rest of them.
He certainly shouldn’t be starting against decent teams, because he simply isn’t good enough.
Even in Klopp system, he is flawed compare to what Klopp has in his hand. Mkhi lack intensity in pressing. The contrast is quite clear to see. Offensive play there is a fine line but it is there, in which the current crop of players in Klopp's hand is more physical capable to ride a challenge when Mkhi can easily get bullied.
Apparently you don't know he played under Klopp in Dortmund and was terrible. His only good season with BVB came under Tuchel.
It’s difficult to respond to something as inane as this without calling it what it is :/
All the players played the way they were instructed. That was the plan. Move on. Shitty plan, shitty game.
OK, what does he have to do to not to be a crap player? Tell me, please. I really want to understand how you think.
I'd take Willian ahead of Mkhi tbh.
I was adamant that he was the wrong signing when we were initially linked with him. I'm not anti Mkhi as he's a nice guy who, on his day, is a good player, but I've never thought he was good enough. He had that spell before his injury against Spurs where I thought I may be wrong but it looks like that was a purple patch more than anything.
A player plays well, the fans will praise him, a player plays like shit, he'll get criticized. As simple as that, being fickle has feck all to do with it. Mkhitaryan is the worst player among those who regularly starts for Man United.
How long is this "settling in" period we are talking about?
It varies from player to player. He’s been here for a season and a bit, and he hasn’t been atrocious. I can’t actually believe the state our fans have got into.
Some of our fans still say the same thing for Shaw.
Absolutely no similarity to a young 21 year old player who broke his leg to an established 27 year old player.
My point not being age but time spent at the club.
No examples with a leg break like Shaw.
It's almost 2 years ago that.
The isssues have mostly been reaccuring niggling injuries on the same leg. Not sure if you've ever broke a bone, but it's extremely difficult to come back both mentally and physically and there can be constant niggles. Anyway this is going off topic so I'll leave it there.
What difference does his age make? He still only came a year ago.
He's great cover for #10 and RW (probably LW too), but I'd bet we'll be bringing in Griezmann (or Ozil if that falls through) to play behind Lukaku, and a new true RW. He's too inconsistent to start when City has two #10/AMs putting in class performances every week.
Age makes a lot of difference. There is a reason why mature players are paid more than youngsters
When he meets the right lady.
Erm, not quite.
When you are a player at your peak (ie. late 20s, like Matic, for example), you are expected to make immediate impact (like Matic). This is the advantage you get with buying players at their peak and is the reason why Jose prefers to buy men, rather than boys.
In the EPL he is weak.
The fecking state of this place does my head in. Our best form this season came when he was on the pitch leading the break and delivering assists for fun. Some of you have the memory of a goldfish. Mhki’s mini-slump coinciding with Pogba being out is complete coincidence, ain’t it? His best is still yet to come.I'm not sure yet if that's true. He was obvipusly better in the Europa League but was that down to it being european football or was it because the standard of opposition was so poor.
He's been excellent in both our CL games too.
