Paul Pogba | Undergoing Medical | Helping out the Laundry Ladies

Do you want Pogba for £100 million?


  • Total voters
    1,968
Actually we should be glad that Fergie got rid of Pogba when he did. Controversial you say, well consider this:

- We went to shit shortly after
- We would in no way be able to get £100m for Pogba
- Raiola and Pogba would have engineered a move and transfer request during our barren years under Moyes and LvG
- Madrid would have pinched him from us for a measly £50m
- Pogba would never again have played for MUFC. And having him during the two baboons spell would just be a waste

So in conclusion, even though it was bitter to loose him for a pittance, we would have lost him a few years down the road anyways and never have the chance to have him play for us again.
Exactly how I feel about it too.

He's become a far superior player at Juve then he would have under Moyes and LVG IMO.
 
SSN says he's in Manchester Saturday.

Was he not going to be in Manchester last week. Or was it the week before?
I'm sure I read that he was going to be announced today.
In fact come to think of it, I'm sure I read that it would be announced in 48 hours.

I do find it strange that journalists make their own timetable and people believe it.
It'll be announced when the clubs/player are ready.
I think the deal is agreed, but beyond that, no journalist knows what's going on. The bolded part is 100% evident.
 
Now the Luckhurst tweet about Getty releasing Pogba pictures. Why don't they just announce the bloody deal already?

You pay for every 'getty' image you want to use, right?

They could see this as a goldmine with every news article wanting to use images of Pogba in a United shirt.
 
One of many terrible moves by fergie 2009-13, just like summer 2009

Yep - transfers really were quite poor after the summer (2008?) when we bought Nani, Ando, Hargreaves, and rented Tevez. The old school stubbornness of not wanting to deal with modern agents wound up costing us in terms of success.
 
The most obvious answer to the delay is that they're waiting on Pogba's holiday to end to finalise it, makes more sense to wait and save yourself from something possibly going wrong, than to confirm a deal being agreed like happened with Aaron Ramsey.

So just wait until his holiday ends.
 
Was he not going to be in Manchester last week. Or was it the week before?
I'm sure I read that he was going to be announced today.
In fact come to think of it, I'm sure I read that it would be announced in 48 hours.

I do find it strange that journalists make their own timetable and people believe it.
It'll be announced when the clubs/player are ready.
I think the deal is agreed, but beyond that, no journalist knows what's going on. The bolded part is 100% evident.
As Raiola said on Twitter: It's just a race between Italian and English media about who is going to break the news first. Probably the first and only true thing he's said. Journos have clearly been briefed somehow, but apparently not about when the deal is being announced.
 
I can't wait to actually discuss Pogba as a player and how he will work in Mourinho's system tactically, as opposed to this waiting for confirmation bullshit. If you would have told me this time last week it would still be rumbling on I'd have jumped out a fecking window.
 
Why would getty be in the know?
I don't think they know. Samuel Luckhurst has just said that they have released dozens of old photos from Pogba's time at United. That could be a coincidence, but the timing would be strange. But don't shoot the messenger. I'm just stating what Luckhurst said.
 
Yep - transfers really were quite poor after the summer (2008?) when we bought Nani, Ando, Hargreaves, and rented Tevez. The old school stubbornness of not wanting to deal with modern agents wound up costing us in terms of success.

even though those buys came in 2007, summer 2008 buying berbatov really was downhill from there and we could not even keep our best player. No question fergie messed up buying a inconsistent forward who was best staying at spurs which was at his level. Fergie just never seemed to even improve positions taken up by average players, anderson, valencia, young, cleverley, welbeck, berbatov, the list goes on with players not up to the task. While sanchez, modric, suarez, robben, WS, toure, even pogba who was ours manages to leave us, just the same when losing ronaldo, which sums the club up, the rest all went to our rivals, and here we are
 
If we are going to believe Luckhurst then he's made Van Gaal seem like an even shitter manager than I thought he was (quite an achievement) by claiming it was Van Gaal's decision to nix the Kroos and Vidal deals. Fecking eejit.

Not sure about those two deals since we would have been out of the race when RM and Bayern signaled their interest. But one we do know is factual is that he nixed Gündogan in favour of Schweinsteiger.

We could have had Gündogan and Pogba as a part of a midfield three, just imagine that.
 
You pay for every 'getty' image you want to use, right?

They could see this as a goldmine with every news article wanting to use images of Pogba in a United shirt.
Yes, that's the way stock photo agencies work.
 
Surely Getty are just releasing images because there is a demand for pictures of Pogba in a United kit, from newspapers etc, at the minute?
 
Why would getty be in the know?
Not saying they are, but Getty are a site that provides stock photos for the press and websites to use in articles. Its not uncommon for someone to give them a nudge and say "we might be needed some Pogba/United picks in the coming days" for their media.
 
Was he not going to be in Manchester last week. Or was it the week before?
I'm sure I read that he was going to be announced today.
In fact come to think of it, I'm sure I read that it would be announced in 48 hours.
No, it was never said he would be in Manchester.

No, you read it would be done in 48 hours - not announced.
 
79 pages to go.

Surely the Getty thing doesn't mean anything.

It'll happen this weekend!
 
Actually we should be glad that Fergie got rid of Pogba when he did. Controversial you say, well consider this:

- We went to shit shortly after
- We would in no way be able to get £100m for Pogba
- Raiola and Pogba would have engineered a move and transfer request during our barren years under Moyes and LvG
- Madrid would have pinched him from us for a measly £50m
- Pogba would never again have played for MUFC. And having him during the two baboons spell would just be a waste

So in conclusion, even though it was bitter to loose him for a pittance, we would have lost him a few years down the road anyways, and never have the chance to have him play for us again.

I completely agree with this.
 
Actually we should be glad that Fergie got rid of Pogba when he did. Controversial you say, well consider this:

- We went to shit shortly after
- We would in no way be able to get £100m for Pogba
- Raiola and Pogba would have engineered a move and transfer request during our barren years under Moyes and LvG
- Madrid would have pinched him from us for a measly £50m
- Pogba would never again have played for MUFC. And having him during the two baboons spell would just be a waste

So in conclusion, even though it was bitter to loose him for a pittance, we would have lost him a few years down the road anyways, and never have the chance to have him play for us again.

Not to mention that he might not have progressed so well.
 
If anything, Getty releasing more old "Pogba @ United" pics would suggest that we're not going to see any new "Pogba @ United" pics anytime soon.

But, yeah, it'll just be because there's currently demand for pics of him in our shirt for all the rumour columns.
 
They wouldn't, they're making hay from the current media frenzy.

A bit late to the party are they not? It's not as if a significant amount of people will sign up especially just to use these images. Those in the industry will already have access to them via previous sign ups and will have anything from a monthly download quota or an unlimited package which I can imagine medium or major news outlets would have. These images are not going to make them a fortune.

Someone needs to fire their marketing department
 
Actually we should be glad that Fergie got rid of Pogba when he did. Controversial you say, well consider this:

- We went to shit shortly after
- We would in no way be able to get £100m for Pogba
- Raiola and Pogba would have engineered a move and transfer request during our barren years under Moyes and LvG
- Madrid would have pinched him from us for a measly £50m
- Pogba would never again have played for MUFC. And having him during the two baboons spell would just be a waste

So in conclusion, even though it was bitter to loose him for a pittance, we would have lost him a few years down the road anyways, and never have the chance to have him play for us again.

Conversely our "barren years" may not have been so barren with an ascendent Pogba doing what he did at Juve over the past four years. It was a silly move to allow him to leave and probably underscored the emerging reality that Fergie's old ways were incompatible with the new era of powerful players and agents.
 
There's obviously going to be a huge demand for old Pogba pics to go along with all the "United splash out £100m for player they already owned once" articles and general transfer stories which are about to be thrust upon us during the next week.

I mean, this is one time when 2+2 clearly equals 4.

I swear some people are still in denial this is actually happening :lol:
 
Conversely our "barren years" may not have been so barren with an ascendent Pogba doing what he did at Juve over the past four years. It was a silly move to allow him to leave and probably underscored the emerging reality that Fergie's old ways were incompatible with the new era of powerful players and agents.

I don't think Pogba would have developed as brilliantly under Moyes and LvG. And I think it would take more than one more potentially WC midfielder to give those two baboons any chance of winning anything of note or taking us forward.

Agreed on Fergies ways though. Rumour has it that if he would have been willing to pay off Hazards agent then he would be playing in red now.